Literature DB >> 25283959

Screening for frailty in older adults using a postal questionnaire: rationale, methods, and instruments validation of the INTER-FRAIL study.

Mauro Di Bari1, Francesco Profili, Stefania Bandinelli, Anna Salvioni, Enrico Mossello, Carla Corridori, Matilde Razzanelli, Teresa Di Fiandra, Paolo Francesconi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a postal screening questionnaire to intercept frailty in older community-dwelling individuals.
DESIGN: A questionnaire was developed on the basis of expert consensus and preliminarily tested against the occurrence of incident disability, in secondary analyses of previous epidemiological studies. The questionnaire was then mailed and its concurrent validity, defined from the association between its individual items and summary score and the presence of the Fried frailty phenotype (FFP), was subsequently evaluated cross-sectionally with in-person examination of initial participants.
SETTING: Community-based. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 70 and older living in two communities near Florence, Italy. MEASUREMENTS: A home comprehensive geriatric assessment including the FFP was conducted in participants who screened positive for frailty and in a limited sample of negative responders.
RESULTS: A 10-item questionnaire, developed based on expert consensus, was preliminarily tested on preexisting epidemiological data and showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.716 versus incident disability. The questionnaire was then mailed to 15,774 subjects, whose response rate was 53.6%. Of the first 1,037 participants included in the concurrent validation study, 833 (80.3%) screened positive, and 380 (36.6%) were frail on assessment. The ability of the questionnaire summary score to predict frailty was adequate, with an AUC of 0.695, a sensitivity of 71%, and a specificity of 58%.
CONCLUSION: A simple questionnaire delivered by mail was able to identify FFP in the community. This would facilitate large-scale screening for frailty in older persons.
© 2014, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2014, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  frailty; postal questionnaire; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25283959     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  17 in total

1.  An Optimal Questionnaire Representing Slow Gait Speed(<1m/s) in Community-dwelling Older Adults: The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS).

Authors:  S Lee; S Kim; M Kim; J Yoo; B Kim; M Yoo; C W Won
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) as a Predicting Tool for Frailty in Older Korean Adults: The Korean Frailty an Aging Cohort Study (KFACS).

Authors:  S Kim; C W Won; B S Kim; S Kim; J Yoo; S Byun; H C Jang; B L Cho; S J Son; J H Lee; Y S Park; K M Choi; H J Kim; S G Lee
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Comparing Survey-Based Frailty Assessment to Medicare Claims in Predicting Health Outcomes and Utilization in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shannon Wu; John Mulcahy; Judith D Kasper; Hong J Kan; Jonathan P Weiner
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2019-05-31

4.  Screening for frailty in primary care: Accuracy of gait speed and hand-grip strength.

Authors:  Linda Lee; Tejal Patel; Andrew Costa; Erin Bryce; Loretta M Hillier; Karen Slonim; Susan W Hunter; George Heckman; Frank Molnar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Sutton; Rebecca L Gould; Stephanie Daley; Mark C Coulson; Emma V Ward; Aine M Butler; Stephen P Nunn; Robert J Howard
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Development and validation of the FRAGIRE tool for assessment an older person's risk for frailty.

Authors:  Dewi Vernerey; Amelie Anota; Pierre Vandel; Sophie Paget-Bailly; Michele Dion; Vanessa Bailly; Marie Bonin; Astrid Pozet; Audrey Foubert; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Patrick Manckoundia; Franck Bonnetain
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Agreement Between 35 Published Frailty Scores in the General Population.

Authors:  Gloria A Aguayo; Anne-Françoise Donneau; Michel T Vaillant; Anna Schritz; Oscar H Franco; Saverio Stranges; Laurent Malisoux; Michèle Guillaume; Daniel R Witte
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Understanding Frailty Screening: a Domain Mapping Exercise.

Authors:  Jill K Van Damme; Kassandra Lemmon; Mark Oremus; Elena Neiterman; Paul Stolee
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Screening for frailty: older populations and older individuals.

Authors:  Brigitte Santos-Eggimann; Nicolas Sirven
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2016-08-22

10.  Comparative analysis of the association between 35 frailty scores and cardiovascular events, cancer, and total mortality in an elderly general population in England: An observational study.

Authors:  Gloria A Aguayo; Michel T Vaillant; Anne-Françoise Donneau; Anna Schritz; Saverio Stranges; Laurent Malisoux; Anna Chioti; Michèle Guillaume; Majon Muller; Daniel R Witte
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.