Literature DB >> 25283801

Comparison of in-person and telephone administration of the Mini-Mental State Examination in the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging.

Richard E Kennedy1, Courtney P Williams, Patricia Sawyer, Richard M Allman, Michael Crowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Telephone (MMSET) against the MMSE.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: Homes of community-dwelling older adults. PARTICIPANTS: African-American and non-Hispanic white adults aged 75 and older participating in the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging II, a longitudinal epidemiological study across the state of Alabama (N = 419). MEASUREMENTS: Cognition, measured using the MMSE, MMSET, and Six-Item Screener (SIS), and function, based on self-reported difficulty performing instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Correlation and agreement coefficients were used to examine concordance of the MMSE and MMSET; linear and logistic regressions were used to test associations with clinical outcomes of IADL difficulty and verified diagnoses of dementia.
RESULTS: The MMSET showed good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.845), similar to the full MMSE, and strong correlation with the latter (Spearman ρ = 0.694, P < .001). The MMSET explained a similar proportion of IADL difficulty as the full MMSE (coefficient of variation = 0.201 and 0.189, respectively). The MMSET was also associated with verified dementia diagnoses (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73), which was similar to the full MMSE.
CONCLUSION: The MMSET is a brief, valid measure of cognition in older adults with psychometric properties similar to that of the full MMSE. Because it can be administered over the telephone, further use in epidemiological studies is promising.
© 2014, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2014, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mini-Mental State Examination; cognitive assessment; epidemiological studies; telephone administration

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25283801      PMCID: PMC4311874          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  10 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  T N Tombaugh; N J McIntyre
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  A systematic review of the reliability of screening for cognitive impairment in older adults by use of standardised assessment tools administered via the telephone.

Authors:  Melinda Martin-Khan; Richard Wootton; Len Gray
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  Validation of a telephone version of the mini-mental state examination.

Authors:  W H Roccaforte; W J Burke; B L Bayer; S P Wengel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.

Authors:  Kilem Li Gwet
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.

Authors:  M P Lawton; E M Brody
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1969

7.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level.

Authors:  R M Crum; J C Anthony; S S Bassett; M F Folstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  Jessica J Jalbert; Lori A Daiello; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Validation of a 26-point telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  Lori A Newkirk; Janise M Kim; Jean M Thompson; Jared R Tinklenberg; Jerome A Yesavage; Joy L Taylor
Journal:  J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.680

10.  Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research.

Authors:  Christopher M Callahan; Frederick W Unverzagt; Siu L Hui; Anthony J Perkins; Hugh C Hendrie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic test accuracy of remote, multidomain cognitive assessment (telephone and video call) for dementia.

Authors:  Lucy C Beishon; Emma Elliott; Tuuli M Hietamies; Riona Mc Ardle; Aoife O'Mahony; Amy R Elliott; Terry J Quinn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-08

2.  Brain atrophy and patch-based grading in individuals from the CIMA-Q study: a progressive continuum from subjective cognitive decline to AD.

Authors:  Christine Marcotte; Olivier Potvin; D Louis Collins; Sylvie Rheault; Simon Duchesne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Accuracy of telephone screening tools to identify dementia patients remotely: systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotte Olivia Riley; Brian McKinstry; Karen Fairhurst
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 4.  Cognitive Assessment via Telephone: A Scoping Review of Instruments.

Authors:  Anne R Carlew; Hudaisa Fatima; Julia R Livingstone; Caitlin Reese; Laura Lacritz; Cody Pendergrass; Kenneth Chase Bailey; Chase Presley; Ben Mokhtari; Colin Munro Cullum
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.813

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.