D M Taylor1, V Cornelius, L Smith, A H Young. 1. Pharmacy Department, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK; Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Treatment of bipolar depression is complicated by variable response and risk of switch to mania. Guidance is informed by the strength of evidence rather than by comparative data. METHOD: We performed a multiple-treatments meta-analysis of randomised, double-blind, controlled comparisons of 4-16 weeks in adults in bipolar depression. The primary efficacy outcome was effect size. The primary acceptability outcome was 'switch to mania'. Secondary outcomes were likelihood of response and withdrawals from trials. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included (8331 participants). Olanzapine + fluoxetine and olanzapine performed best on primary outcome measure being ranked highest for effect size. Switch to mania was least likely with ziprasidone and then quetiapine. Olanzapine + fluoxetine was also ranked the highest for response with lurasidone second, but olanzapine + fluoxetine and olanzapine had the optimal effect on response and withdrawal from treatment when the two parameters were considered together. Several treatments [monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), ziprasidone, aripiprazole and risperidone] have limited or no therapeutic activity in bipolar depression. CONCLUSION: Olanzapine + fluoxetine should be first-line treatment. Olanzapine, quetiapine, lurasidone, valproate and selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors are also recommended. Tricyclic antidepressants and lithium are worthy of consideration but lamotrigine (high risk of switching, less robust efficacy) and MAOIs, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and risperidone (no evidence of efficacy) should not be used.
OBJECTIVE: Treatment of bipolar depression is complicated by variable response and risk of switch to mania. Guidance is informed by the strength of evidence rather than by comparative data. METHOD: We performed a multiple-treatments meta-analysis of randomised, double-blind, controlled comparisons of 4-16 weeks in adults in bipolar depression. The primary efficacy outcome was effect size. The primary acceptability outcome was 'switch to mania'. Secondary outcomes were likelihood of response and withdrawals from trials. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included (8331 participants). Olanzapine + fluoxetine and olanzapine performed best on primary outcome measure being ranked highest for effect size. Switch to mania was least likely with ziprasidone and then quetiapine. Olanzapine + fluoxetine was also ranked the highest for response with lurasidone second, but olanzapine + fluoxetine and olanzapine had the optimal effect on response and withdrawal from treatment when the two parameters were considered together. Several treatments [monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), ziprasidone, aripiprazole and risperidone] have limited or no therapeutic activity in bipolar depression. CONCLUSION:Olanzapine + fluoxetine should be first-line treatment. Olanzapine, quetiapine, lurasidone, valproate and selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors are also recommended. Tricyclic antidepressants and lithium are worthy of consideration but lamotrigine (high risk of switching, less robust efficacy) and MAOIs, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and risperidone (no evidence of efficacy) should not be used.
Authors: Rebecca F McKnight; Saïk J G N de La Motte de Broöns de Vauvert; Edward Chesney; Ben H Amit; John Geddes; Andrea Cipriani Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-06-01
Authors: Bernardo Sampaio-Junior; Gabriel Tortella; Lucas Borrione; Adriano H Moffa; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Eric Cretaz; Adriano Fernandes da Silva; Renério Fraguas; Luana V Aparício; Izio Klein; Beny Lafer; Stephan Goerigk; Isabela Martins Benseñor; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Wagner F Gattaz; André Russowsky Brunoni Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Tom Hughes; Alastair Cardno; Robert West; Federica Marino-Francis; Imogen Featherstone; Keeley Rolling; Alice Locker; Kate McLintock; Allan House Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jay A Salpekar; Paramjit T Joshi; David A Axelson; Shauna P Reinblatt; Gayane Yenokyan; Abanti Sanyal; John T Walkup; Benedetto Vitiello; Joan L Luby; Karen Dineen Wagner; Nasima Nusrat; Mark A Riddle Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 8.829