| Literature DB >> 25283308 |
Elham Rouhollahi1, Soheil Zorofchian Moghadamtousi, Omer Abdalla Ahmed Hamdi, Mehran Fadaeinasab, Maryam Hajrezaie, Khalijah Awang, Chung Yeng Looi, Mahmood Ameen Abdulla, Zahurin Mohamed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Curcuma purpurascens BI. is a medicinal plant from the Zingiberaceae family, which is widely used as a spice and as folk medicine. The aim of the present study is to investigate the gastroprotective activity of C. purpurascens rhizome hexane extract (CPRHE) against ethanol- induced gastric ulcers in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25283308 PMCID: PMC4197259 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
The experimental design and specifications of the animal study
| Groups | Description | Pre-treatment | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Normal control | 5% Tween 20 (5 ml/kg) | 5% Tween 20 |
| Group B | Lesion control | 5% Tween 20 (5 ml/kg) | absolute ethanol |
| Group C | Treatment control | Omeprazole (20 mg/kg) | absolute ethanol |
| Group D | Experimental group1 | CPRHE (200 mg/kg) | absolute ethanol |
| Group E | Experimental group2 | CPRHE (400 mg/kg) | absolute ethanol |
Figure 1A typical gas chromatogram. The chromatogram showed the chemical constituents of C. purpurascens hexane extract.
The major bioactive compounds of hexane extract as characterized using GC-MS-TOF analysis
| Peak No. | Name of Compounds | Retention Time (s) | Mass |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | c-elemene | 1812.55 | 189 |
| 2 | benzofuran, 6-ethenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-3,6-dimethyl-5-isopropenyl | 1931.3 | 216 |
| 3 | 3,7-cyclodecadien-1-one,3,7-dimethyl-10-(1-methylethylidene) | 2123.3 | 218 |
| 4 | turmerone | 2254.45 | 218 |
| 5 | curlone | 2326.55 | 218 |
Serum biochemical analysis of rats. Effect of CPRHE on (a) renal function test, (b) liver function test and (c) hematology analysis of the rodents
| Animal groups | Serum biochemical analysis | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Vehicle | 142.23 ± 0.45 | 4.85 ± 0.06 | 104.59 ± 0.45 | 23.89 ± 0.64 | 19.36 ± 0.48 | 5.28 ± 0.58 | 30.75 ± 1.87 | ||
| CPRHE (1 g/kg) | 143.54 ± 0.37 | 5.12 ± 0.72 | 106.24 ± 0.54 | 21.49 ± 0.73 | 19.58 ± 0.75 | 5.93 ± 0.43 | 29.81 ± 2.27 | ||
| CPRHE (2 g/kg) | 143.85 ± 0.82 | 4.91 ± 0.034 | 105.27 ± 0.56 | 22.85 ± 0.48 | 19.95 ± 0.39 | 5.68 ± 0.37 | 31.46 ± 2.19 | ||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Vehicle | 60.76 ± 0.94 | 9.56 ± 0.39 | 51.07 ± 1.28 | 2.19 ± 0.13 | 0.87 ± 0.17 | 154.45 ± 5.37 | 50.49 ± 1.34 | 173.82 ± 5.38 | 3.45 ± 0.27 |
| CPRHE (1 g/kg) | 58.37 ± 0.57 | 8.35 ± 0.53 | 50.68 ± 1.32 | 2.14 ± 0.16 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 153.23 ± 5.87 | 45.65 ± 1.74 | 175.48 ± 6.49 | 3.37 ± 0.53 |
| CPRHE (2 g/kg) | 59.67 ± 1.29 | 8.87 ± 0.19 | 50.25 ± 1.45 | 2.15 ± 0.14 | 0.84 ± 0.16 | 155.73 ± 6.82 | 46.76 ± 1.48 | 176.27 ± 6.52 | 3.57 ± 0.43 |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Vehicle | 15.03 ± 0.13 | 46 ± 0.00 | 9.38 ± 0.13 | 59.12 ± 0.65 | 19.25 ± 0.31 | 34.22 ± 0.19 | 17.03 ± 0.44 | 6.12 ± 0.47 | 986.75 ± 23.65 |
| CPRHE (1 g/kg) | 15.47 ± 0.13 | 46 ± 0.00 | 9.64 ± 0.18 | 58.54 ± 0.63 | 18.89 ± 0.36 | 34.04 ± 0.33 | 18.23 ± 0.58 | 6.23 ± 0.34 | 995.36 ± 25.32 |
| CPRHE (2 g/kg) | 15.98 ± 0.12 | 46 ± 0.00 | 9.83 ± 0.16 | 57.78 ± 0.76 | 18.59 ± 0.29 | 33.93 ± 0.28 | 18.77 ± 0.34 | 6.31 ± 0.39 | 1011.52 ± 23.18 |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; CB, conjugated bilirubin; GGT: G-glutamyl transferase; HCT, hematocrit; HGB, hemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; RBC, red cell count; RDW, red cell distribution width; TB: total bilirubin; WBC, white cell.
The results did not show any significant difference between groups.
Figure 2Histological sections. Histopathology of kidney (first row) and liver (second row) in acute toxicity study representing the rats treated with vehicle (5% Tween 20), CPRHE (1 g/kg) and CPRHE (2 g/kg). The result did not show significant differences in the structures of kidney and liver between treated and control groups (20× magnifications).
Gastroprotective effect of CPRHE against ethanol-induced gastric injury
| Animal Groups | Animal Groups | pH of Gastric tissue | Mucus Weight (g) | Ulcer area (mm) 2 | Inhibition (%) | MDA (μmol/g protein) | SOD (U/g protein) | Nitric oxide (μmol/g protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Normal control | 7.02 ± .004 | 0.89 ± 0.03 |
|
| 10 ± 1.1 | 528 ± 16.51 | 10 ± 1.3 |
| B | Lesion control | 2.99 ± 0.17 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 880 ± 16.23 |
| 28 ± 2.98 | 333 ± 9.98 | 5.9 ± 0.47 |
| C | Treatment control | 6.14 ± 0.24* | 0.79 ± 0.03* | 195 ± 8.97* | 77 | 13 ± 0.71* | 481 ± 12.22* | 9.1 ± 1.4* |
| D | CPRHE (200 mg/kg) | 4.47 ± 0.09* | 0.68 ± 0.02* | 455 ± 12.24* | 48 | 21 ± 0.22* | 393 ± 7.67* | 7.6 ± 0.8* |
| E | CPRHE (400 mg/kg) | 5.82 ± 0.41* | 0.72 ± 0.02* | 325 ± 10.67* | 63 | 17 ± 0.41* | 459 ± 10.73* | 8.4 ± 0.9* |
All values are expressed as mean ± SD. *indicates (P <0.05) compared to the (B) lesion control group. CPRHE: C. purpurascens rhizome hexane extract.
Figure 3Gross evaluation. Results demonstrated that the rodents pre-treated with (C) omeprazole and CPRHE at doses of (D) 200 mg/kg and (E) 400 mg/kg had conspicuously decreased area of gastric ulcer formation compared to (B) ulcer control. (A) Normal control group demonstrated no gastric lesion formation.
Figure 4Histological evaluation. Histopathology of rodents pre-treated with (C) omeprazole or CPRHE at the doses of (D) 200 mg/kg and (E) 400 mg/kg compared to the (B) lesion control group. (A) Normal control group demonstrated normal histological structure. (H and E stain10×).
Figure 5Immunohistochemical examination of Hsp70 (first row) and Bax (second row). The results depicted the down-regulation of Bax and up-regulation of Hsp70 proteins in rats pre-treated with (C) omeprazole and CPRHE at the doses of (D) 200 mg/kg and (E) 400 mg/kg compared to the (B) lesion control group. (A) Normal control group demonstrated normal Immunohistochemical structure.