Literature DB >> 25282061

Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of opposing lateral visuospatial asymmetries in the upper and lower visual fields.

Gerard M Loughnane1, John P Shanley2, Edmund C Lalor3, Redmond G O'Connell4.   

Abstract

Neurologically healthy individuals typically exhibit a subtle bias towards the left visual field during spatial judgments, known as "pseudoneglect". However, it has yet to be reliably established if the direction and magnitude of this lateral bias varies along the vertical plane. Here, participants were required to distribute their attention equally across a checkerboard array spanning the entire visual field in order to detect transient targets that appeared at unpredictable locations. Reaction times (RTs) were faster to left hemifield targets in the lower visual field but the opposite trend was observed for targets in the upper field. Electroencephalogram (EEG) analyses focused on the interval prior to target onset in order to identify endogenous neural correlates of these behavioral asymmetries. The relative hemispheric distribution of pre-target oscillatory alpha power was predictive of RT bias to targets in the lower visual field but not the upper field, indicating separate attentional mechanisms for the upper and lower visual fields. Analysis of multifocal visual-evoked potentials (MVEP) in the pre-target interval also indicated that the opposing upper and lower field asymmetries may impact on the magnitude of primary visual cortical responses. These results provide new evidence of a functional segregation of upper and lower field visuospatial processing.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha; Attention; MVEP; Neglect; Pseudoneglect

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25282061     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

1.  Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.

Authors:  Daniel P Newman; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Gaining the upper hand: evidence of vertical asymmetry in sex-categorisation of human hands.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-12-31

3.  Improved correspondence of fMRI visual field localizer data after cortex-based macroanatomical alignment.

Authors:  Mishal Qubad; Catherine V Barnes-Scheufler; Michael Schaum; Eva Raspor; Lara Rösler; Benjamin Peters; Carmen Schiweck; Rainer Goebel; Andreas Reif; Robert A Bittner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Ocular exposure to blue-enriched light has an asymmetric influence on neural activity and spatial attention.

Authors:  Daniel P Newman; Steven W Lockley; Gerard M Loughnane; Ana Carina P Martins; Rafael Abe; Marco T R Zoratti; Simon P Kelly; Megan H O'Neill; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Redmond G O'Connell; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Asymmetries in Distractibility: Left Distractors Improve Reaction Time Performance.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Trial-by-trial co-variation of pre-stimulus EEG alpha power and visuospatial bias reflects a mixture of stochastic and deterministic effects.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Christian Keitel; Monika Harvey; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.