Literature DB >> 25281331

Comparison of radiographic sagittal spinopelvic alignment between skeletally immature and skeletally mature individuals with Scheuermann's disease.

Marcin Tyrakowski1, Piotr Janusz, Steven Mardjetko, Tomasz Kotwicki, Kris Siemionow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare radiographic sagittal spinopelvic parameters between skeletally immature and skeletally mature patients with Scheuermann's disease (SD).
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of standing postero-anterior and lateral radiographs of the spine of patients with SD was performed. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured on the lateral radiographs. Risser's sign was assessed on the postero-anterior radiographs. All of the parameters measured were compared between skeletally immature (Risser's sign 0-3) versus mature patients (Risser's sign 5). PI, PT, and SS in both groups were compared to PI, PT, and SS reported for normal children, adolescents, and adults.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with SD (33 immature and 33 mature) were retrospectively reviewed and included in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups of SD patients in: SVA (-16.6 vs. -22.9 mm, p = 0.74), TK (57.8° vs. 56°, p = 0.66), TLK (7.8° vs. 11.7º, p = 0.14), LL (63.2° vs. 62.2°, p = 0.74), PI (36.7° vs. 39.4°, p = 0.20), PT (3.8° vs. 7.3°, p = 0.10), and SS (32.8° vs. 32.1°, p = 0.75). Both, the immature and mature group of SD patients presented significantly lower PI and SS than normal children, adolescents, and adults, and significantly lower PT than normal adults.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in sagittal spinopelvic parameters between skeletally immature and mature subjects with SD. Pelvic incidence in both groups of SD patients was significantly lower than PI in normal children, adolescents, and adults. This challenges the role of PI in predicting desired LL in patients with SD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25281331     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3595-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  38 in total

1.  Correlation of pelvic incidence with low- and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Darrell S Hanson; Keith H Bridwell; John M Rhee; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Adult Scheuermann kyphosis: evaluation, management, and new developments.

Authors:  Kirkham B Wood; Rojeh Melikian; Fernando Villamil
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Pelvic parameters: origin and significance.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Aunoble; Leijssen Philippe; Pellet Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Pediatric sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Jérôme Jund; Olivier Noseda; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  How is sagittal balance acquired during bipedal gait acquisition? Comparison of neonatal and adult pelves in three dimensions. Evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Christine Tardieu; Noémie Bonneau; Jérôme Hecquet; Christophe Boulay; Catherine Marty; Jean Legaye; Geneviève Duval-Beaupère
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Péter Rajnics; Alexandre Templier; Wafa Skalli; Francois Lavaste; Tamás Illés
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-02

8.  Juvenile kyphosis.

Authors:  D S Bradford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Analysis of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar angular kyphosis.

Authors:  Weishi Li; Zhuoran Sun; Zhaoqing Guo; Qiang Qi; Sang Do Kim; Yan Zeng; Chuiguo Sun; Zhongqiang Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Evidence based medicine: analysis of Scheuermann kyphosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Breton G Line
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Patients With Scheuermann's Disease: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Saif Farhan; Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman; Theodore A Belanger; Arif Musa; Martin C Eichler
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

2.  Sacral orientation and Scheuermann's kyphosis.

Authors:  Smadar Peleg; Gali Dar; Nili Steinberg; Youssef Masharawi; Israel Hershkovitz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-20

Review 3.  Two-dimensional digital photography for child body posture evaluation: standardized technique, reliable parameters and normative data for age 7-10 years.

Authors:  L Stolinski; M Kozinoga; D Czaprowski; M Tyrakowski; P Cerny; N Suzuki; T Kotwicki
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 4.  Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism.

Authors:  Hong-Fang Chen; Chang-Qing Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  The method for measurement of the three-dimensional scoliosis angle from standard radiographs.

Authors:  Paweł Główka; Wojciech Politarczyk; Piotr Janusz; Łukasz Woźniak; Tomasz Kotwicki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.