Literature DB >> 25281310

CNV amplitude as a neural correlate for stuttering frequency: A case report of acquired stuttering.

Sarah Vanhoutte1, John Van Borsel2, Marjan Cosyns3, Katja Batens4, Pieter van Mierlo5, Dimitri Hemelsoet6, Dirk Van Roost7, Paul Corthals8, Miet De Letter9, Patrick Santens10.   

Abstract

A neural hallmark of developmental stuttering is abnormal articulatory programming. One of the neurophysiological substrates of articulatory preparation is the contingent negative variation (CNV). Unfortunately, CNV tasks are rarely performed in persons who stutter and mainly focus on the effect of task variation rather than on interindividual variation in stutter related variables. However, variations in motor programming seem to be related to variation in stuttering frequency. The current study presents a case report of acquired stuttering following stroke and stroke related surgery in the left superior temporal gyrus. A speech related CNV task was administered at four points in time with differences in stuttering severity and frequency. Unexpectedly, CNV amplitudes at electrode sites approximating bilateral motor and left inferior frontal gyrus appeared to be inversely proportional to stuttering frequency. The higher the stuttering frequency, the lower the activity for articulatory preparation. Thus, the amount of disturbance in motor programming seems to determine stuttering frequency. At right frontal electrodes, a relative increase in CNV amplitude was seen at the test session with most severe stuttering. Right frontal overactivation is cautiously suggested to be a compensation strategy. In conclusion, late CNV amplitude elicited by a relatively simple speech task seems to be able to provide an objective, neural correlate of stuttering frequency. The present case report supports the hypothesis that motor preparation has an important role in stuttering.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  %SS; Contingent negative variation; Motor preparation; Stuttering; Stuttering severity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25281310     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  4 in total

1.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: IV. The Pause Marker Index.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Speech Timing Deficit of Stuttering: Evidence from Contingent Negative Variations.

Authors:  Ning Ning; Danling Peng; Xiangping Liu; Shuang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Neural Marker of Speech Intention: Evidence From Contingent Negative Variation.

Authors:  Juhi Kidwai; Jonathan S Brumberg; Brianna M Marsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Assessing the Relationship Between Motor Anticipation and Cortical Excitability in Subacute Stroke Patients With Movement-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Yurong Mao; Minghui Ding; Le Li; Yan Leng; Jiangli Zhao; Zhiqin Xu; Dong Feng Huang; Wai Leung Ambrose Lo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.