Juntaro Matsumoto1, Toshiyasu Ogata2, Hiroshi Abe1, Toshio Higashi1, Koichi Takano3, Tooru Inoue1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan. Electronic address: toshi.ogata1@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the features of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively registered 93 consecutive patients and 108 arteries with confirmed diagnoses of dissection in the vertebral artery (VA) or PICA between February 2007 and January 2014. Patients were diagnosed with arterial dissection when they had both acute symptoms and radiological characteristics in magnetic resonance imaging or digital subtraction angiography. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether the site of dissection was VA (VA group) or PICA (PICA group). We compared the clinical and radiological characteristics and clinical outcomes of PICA versus VA dissection. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients included in this study, 83 were in the VA group, and 10 had arterial dissection in the PICA. Patients with PICA dissection more frequently suffered from SAH (P < .001), whereas nonstroke symptom was often the initial symptom in the VA group. Pearl sign was seen most frequently at the dissection site of PICA. Surgical or endovascular treatment was performed in 9 of 10 PICA dissections, whereas more than half of the VA dissections were treated conservatively (P < .001). SAH was significantly more severe in the patients with PICA dissection compared with those in the VA group (P = .049). CONCLUSION: Patients with PICA dissection suffered from subarachnoid hemorrhage more frequently than those with VA dissection. PICA dissection was treated with surgical intervention, whereas VA dissection was treated conservatively.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the features of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively registered 93 consecutive patients and 108 arteries with confirmed diagnoses of dissection in the vertebral artery (VA) or PICA between February 2007 and January 2014. Patients were diagnosed with arterial dissection when they had both acute symptoms and radiological characteristics in magnetic resonance imaging or digital subtraction angiography. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether the site of dissection was VA (VA group) or PICA (PICA group). We compared the clinical and radiological characteristics and clinical outcomes of PICA versus VA dissection. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients included in this study, 83 were in the VA group, and 10 had arterial dissection in the PICA. Patients with PICA dissection more frequently suffered from SAH (P < .001), whereas nonstroke symptom was often the initial symptom in the VA group. Pearl sign was seen most frequently at the dissection site of PICA. Surgical or endovascular treatment was performed in 9 of 10 PICA dissections, whereas more than half of the VA dissections were treated conservatively (P < .001). SAH was significantly more severe in the patients with PICA dissection compared with those in the VA group (P = .049). CONCLUSION:Patients with PICA dissection suffered from subarachnoid hemorrhage more frequently than those with VA dissection. PICA dissection was treated with surgical intervention, whereas VA dissection was treated conservatively.