Fenna T Phibbs1, Srivatsan Pallavaram2, Christopher Tolleson3, Pierre-François D'Haese2, Benoit M Dawant2. 1. Dept. of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: fenna.phibbs@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Dept. of Electrical Eng. & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. Dept. of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Post-operative programming of deep brain stimulation for movement disorders can be both time consuming and difficult, which can delay the optimal symptom control for the patient. Probabilistic maps of stimulation response could improve programming efficiency and optimization. METHODS: The clinically selected contacts of patients who had undergone ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor at our institution were compared against contacts selected based on a probability map of symptom reduction built by populating data from a number of patients using non-rigid image registration. A subgroup of patients whose clinical contacts did not match the map-based selections prospectively underwent a tremor rating scale evaluation to compare the symptom relief achieved by the two options. Both the patient and video reviewer were blinded to the selection. RESULTS: 54% of the map-based and clinical contacts were an exact match retrospectively and were within one contact 83% of the time. In 5 of the 8 mismatched leads that were evaluated prospectively in a double blind fashion, the map-based contact showed equivalent or better tremor improvement than the clinically active contact. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that probability maps of stimulation responses can assist in selecting the clinically optimal contact and increase the efficiency of programming.
INTRODUCTION: Post-operative programming of deep brain stimulation for movement disorders can be both time consuming and difficult, which can delay the optimal symptom control for the patient. Probabilistic maps of stimulation response could improve programming efficiency and optimization. METHODS: The clinically selected contacts of patients who had undergone ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor at our institution were compared against contacts selected based on a probability map of symptom reduction built by populating data from a number of patients using non-rigid image registration. A subgroup of patients whose clinical contacts did not match the map-based selections prospectively underwent a tremor rating scale evaluation to compare the symptom relief achieved by the two options. Both the patient and video reviewer were blinded to the selection. RESULTS: 54% of the map-based and clinical contacts were an exact match retrospectively and were within one contact 83% of the time. In 5 of the 8 mismatched leads that were evaluated prospectively in a double blind fashion, the map-based contact showed equivalent or better tremor improvement than the clinically active contact. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that probability maps of stimulation responses can assist in selecting the clinically optimal contact and increase the efficiency of programming.
Authors: Pierre-François D'Haese; Srivatsan Pallavaram; Rui Li; Michael S Remple; Chris Kao; Joseph S Neimat; Peter E Konrad; Benoit M Dawant Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Pierre-François D'Haese; Ebru Cetinkaya; Peter E Konrad; Chris Kao; Benoit M Dawant Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Wieslaw L Nowinski; Dmitry Belov; A Thirunavuukarasuu; Alim Louis Benabid Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Pierre-François D'Haese; Srivatsan Pallavaram; Chris Kao; Joseph S Neimat; Peter E Konrad; Benoit M Dawant Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Till A Dembek; Michael T Barbe; Mattias Åström; Mauritius Hoevels; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Gereon R Fink; Lars Timmermann Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.881