Literature DB >> 25280588

Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.

Lynn V Dicks1, Jessica C Walsh2, William J Sutherland2.   

Abstract

Making decisions informed by the best-available science is an objective for many organisations managing the environment or natural resources. Yet, available science is still not widely used in environmental policy and practice. We describe a '4S' hierarchy for organising relevant science to inform decisions. This hierarchy has already revolutionised clinical practice. It is beginning to emerge for environmental management, although all four levels need substantial development before environmental decision-makers can reliably and efficiently find the evidence they need. We expose common bypass routes that currently lead to poor or biased representation of scientific knowledge. We argue that the least developed level of the hierarchy is that closest to decision-makers, placing synthesised scientific knowledge into environmental decision support systems.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  environmental decision-making; environmental management; evidence; evidence-based conservation; information; policy; practice

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25280588     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  14 in total

1.  Environmental management: Synthesize evidence to steer decisions.

Authors:  Anne-Christine Mupepele; Carsten F Dormann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Incorporating social dimensions in planning, managing and evaluating environmental projects.

Authors:  C Louise Goggin; Thomas Barrett; John Leys; Gregory Summerell; Emma Gorrod; Stuart Waters; Mark Littleboy; Tony D Auld; Michael J Drielsma; Brian R Jenkins
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Bridging research and practice in conservation.

Authors:  Andrew N Kadykalo; Rachel T Buxton; Peter Morrison; Christine M Anderson; Holly Bickerton; Charles M Francis; Adam C Smith; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 7.563

4.  How much flower-rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge.

Authors:  Lynn V Dicks; Mathilde Baude; Stuart P M Roberts; James Phillips; Mike Green; Claire Carvell
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.465

5.  How experimental biology and ecology can support evidence-based decision-making in conservation: avoiding pitfalls and enabling application.

Authors:  Steven J Cooke; Kim Birnie-Gauvin; Robert J Lennox; Jessica J Taylor; Trina Rytwinski; Jodie L Rummer; Craig E Franklin; Joseph R Bennett; Neal R Haddaway
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.079

6.  Hallmarks of science missing from North American wildlife management.

Authors:  Kyle A Artelle; John D Reynolds; Adrian Treves; Jessica C Walsh; Paul C Paquet; Chris T Darimont
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Finding the right connection: what makes a successful decision support system?

Authors:  David C Rose; Toby J A Bruce
Journal:  Food Energy Secur       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 4.109

8.  Framing natural assets for advancing sustainability research: translating different perspectives into actions.

Authors:  Maria Jose Martinez-Harms; Stefan Gelcich; Rainer M Krug; Fleur J F Maseyk; Hannah Moersberger; Archi Rastogi; Geoffrey Wambugu; Cornelia B Krug; Eva M Spehn; Unai Pascual
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 6.367

9.  What works in conservation? Using expert assessment of summarised evidence to identify practices that enhance natural pest control in agriculture.

Authors:  Lynn V Dicks; Hugh L Wright; Joscelyne E Ashpole; James Hutchison; Caitlin G McCormack; Barbara Livoreil; Klaus Peter Zulka; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Biodivers Conserv       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.549

10.  Wildlife in the cloud: a new approach for engaging stakeholders in wildlife management.

Authors:  Guillaume Chapron
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.