OBJECT: While progesterone has been well studied in experimental models of adult traumatic brain injury (TBI), it has not been evaluated in pediatric models. The study of promising interventions in pediatric TBI is important because children have the highest public health burden of such injuries. Therapies that are beneficial in adults may not necessarily be effective in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether progesterone treatment improves outcomes in an experimental model of pediatric TBI. METHODS: The authors determined whether progesterone administered after controlled cortical impact (CCI) improves functional and histopathological outcomes in 4-week-old mice. Both male and female mice (58 mice total) were included in this study, as the majority of prior studies have used only male and/or reproductively senescent females. Mice were randomized to treatment with progesterone or vehicle and to CCI injury or sham injury. Motor (wire grip test) and memory (Morris water maze) testing were performed to determine the effect of progesterone on TBI. Lesion volume was also assessed. RESULTS: Compared with their vehicle-treated counterparts, the progesterone-treated CCI-injured male mice had improved motor performance (p < 0.001). In contrast, progesterone-treated CCI-injured female mice had a worse performance than their vehicle-treated counterparts (p = 0.001). Progesterone treatment had no effect on spatial memory performance or lesion volume in injured male or female mice. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a sex-specific effect of progesterone treatment after CCI in adolescent mice and could inform clinical trials in children.
OBJECT: While progesterone has been well studied in experimental models of adult traumatic brain injury (TBI), it has not been evaluated in pediatric models. The study of promising interventions in pediatric TBI is important because children have the highest public health burden of such injuries. Therapies that are beneficial in adults may not necessarily be effective in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether progesterone treatment improves outcomes in an experimental model of pediatric TBI. METHODS: The authors determined whether progesterone administered after controlled cortical impact (CCI) improves functional and histopathological outcomes in 4-week-old mice. Both male and female mice (58 mice total) were included in this study, as the majority of prior studies have used only male and/or reproductively senescent females. Mice were randomized to treatment with progesterone or vehicle and to CCI injury or sham injury. Motor (wire grip test) and memory (Morris water maze) testing were performed to determine the effect of progesterone on TBI. Lesion volume was also assessed. RESULTS: Compared with their vehicle-treated counterparts, the progesterone-treated CCI-injured male mice had improved motor performance (p < 0.001). In contrast, progesterone-treated CCI-injured female mice had a worse performance than their vehicle-treated counterparts (p = 0.001). Progesterone treatment had no effect on spatial memory performance or lesion volume in injured male or female mice. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a sex-specific effect of progesterone treatment after CCI in adolescent mice and could inform clinical trials in children.
Entities:
Keywords:
CCI = controlled cortical impact; MWM = Morris water maze; TBI = traumatic brain injury; adolescent; neuroprotection; progesterone; sex differences; traumatic brain injury
Authors: Nigel C Jones; Despina Constantin; Malcolm J W Prior; Peter G Morris; Charles A Marsden; Sean Murphy Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Shenandoah Robinson; Jesse L Winer; Justin Berkner; Lindsay A S Chan; Jesse L Denson; Jessie R Maxwell; Yirong Yang; Laurel O Sillerud; Robert C Tasker; William P Meehan; Rebekah Mannix; Lauren L Jantzie Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Laura M Cox; Hadi Abou-El-Hassan; Amir Hadi Maghzi; Julia Vincentini; Howard L Weiner Journal: Brain Res Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Tanya Bogoslovsky; Joshua D Bernstock; Greg Bull; Shawn Gouty; Brian M Cox; John M Hallenbeck; Dragan Maric Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Sheryl E Arambula; Erin L Reinl; Nagat El Demerdash; Margaret M McCarthy; Courtney L Robertson Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2019-03-02 Impact factor: 5.330