Literature DB >> 2527957

Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye.

D H Westendorf1.   

Abstract

Reaction time was used to gauge the sensitivity of an eye during its dominant and suppressed phases of binocular rivalry. During dominance, performance was uniformly good in detecting both stimuli that were spatially identical to the suppressed stimulus and those that were different in spatial frequency. When suppressed eyes were tested, performance was poor when the stimulus was different from the dominating stimulus, but even worse when the test stimulus and the dominating stimulus were spatially identical. The results favor the view that suppression operates nonselectively on a monocular visual channel, prior to the point at which dichoptic pattern masking occurs.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2527957     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  2 in total

1.  Binocular rivalry of equiluminant targets.

Authors:  D H Westendorf; M P Galupo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

2.  Do early neural correlates of visual consciousness show the oblique effect? A binocular rivalry and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Bradley N Jack; Urte Roeber; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.