| Literature DB >> 25279545 |
Parfait K Kouamé1, Kouassi Dongo1, Hung Nguyen-Viet2, Christian Zurbrügg3, Christoph Lüthi4, Jan Hattendorf5, Jürg Utzinger6, Jean Biémi7, Bassirou Bonfoh8.
Abstract
Poor waste management is a key driver of ill-health in urban settlements of developing countries. The current study aimed at assessing environmental and human health risks related to urban waste management in Yamoussoukro, the political capital of Côte d'Ivoire. We undertook trans-disciplinary research within an Ecohealth approach, comprised of a participatory workshop with stakeholders and mapping of exposure patterns. A total of 492 randomly selected households participated in a cross-sectional survey. Waste deposit sites were characterised and 108 wastewater samples were subjected to laboratory examinations. The physico-chemical parameters of the surface water (temperature, pH, conductivity, potential oxidise reduction, BOD5, COD, dissolved oxygen, nitrates, ammonia and total Kendal nitrogen) did not comply with World Health Organization standards of surface water quality. Questionnaire results showed that malaria was the most commonly reported disease. Diarrhoea and malaria were associated with poor sanitation. Households having dry latrines had a higher risk of diarrhoea (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.7) compared to latrines with septic tanks and also a higher risk for malaria (OR = 1.9, 95% (CI) 1.1-3.3). Our research showed that combining health and environmental assessments enables a deeper understanding of environmental threats and disease burdens linked to poor waste management. Further study should investigate the sanitation strategy aspects that could reduce the environmental and health risks in the study area.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25279545 PMCID: PMC4210979 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111010292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The study area, the city of Yamoussoukro in Côte d’Ivoire.
Figure 2Framework for developing an integrated approach for environmental and health risks factors analysis.
Main variables for understanding disease occurrences related to household exposure.
| Variables | Description | Indicator | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | Environment | ||
| Socioeconomic status | Poor or wealthy | x | x |
| Living place | Residential area or poor settlement | x | x |
| Solid waste discharged | Close/far (10–50 m) to the household and surrounding activities (restaurants) | x | x |
| Wastewater released | In open drainage or septic tanks | x | x |
| Household drinking water source | Wells or taps | x | x |
| Access to safe sanitation facilities | Pit latrine or septic tank influence disease occurrences? | x | |
| Type of reference diseases | Malaria, typhoid, diarrheal cases | x | |
| Vegetables crops from the urban agriculture using contaminated wastewater | Salad crop, carotene, cucumber, tomatoes | x | |
Water quality parameters and analytical methods.
| Parameters | Abbreviation | Unit | Analytical Techniques |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Temp | °C | Multiple parameter pocket, WTW 350i |
| Electrical conductivity | Cond | μS/cm | Multiple parameter pocket, WTW 350i |
| pH | pH | - | Multiple parameter pocket, WTW 350i |
| BOD | BOD5 | mg/L | 5-day incubation at 20 °C with BOD Track, HACH version 26197-94 |
| Chemical oxygen demand | COD | mg/L | Titrimetric method with dichromate potassium NF T 90-101-2001 |
| TNK | TNK | mg/L | TNK method (Norm ISO 5663-1984) after mineralisation with selenium |
| Dissolved oxygen | DO | mg/L | Multiple parameter pocket, WTW 350i |
| Ammonium nitrogen | NH4+ | mg/L | Salicylate Method, HACH DR/2400 programme 385N |
| Nitrate | NO3− | mg/L | Reduction Method with cadmium, HACH DR/2400 program 353N |
Figure 3Mapping of disease burdens pathways, and the lack of solid waste and wastewater management in Yamoussoukro.
Physico-chemical parameters characteristic in dry season (mean, standard deviation).
| Sample Site | Location | pH | DO (mg/L) | Cond (μS/cm) | NO3− (mg/L) | NH4+ (mg/L) | BOD5 (mg/L) | COD (mg/L) | TNK (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guiglo | 6.9 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 2.8 | 291.7 ± 98.2 | 8.3 ± 9.6 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 17.5 ± 5.1 | 44.8 ± 14.4 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| 2 | Presidence | 7.7 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 2.4 | 211.6 ± 23.8 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 24.6 ± 5.9 | 58.1 ± 13.3 | 1.3 ± 0.1 |
| 3 | Ngokro | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 1.8 | 326.2 ± 56.4 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 27.3 ± 12.9 | 58.6 ± 19.8 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| 4 | Cyclone | 7.3 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 1.1 | 290.0 ± .9 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 23.1 ± 8.0 | 53.3 ± 18.7 | 1.4 ± 0.2 |
| 5 | CHR | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 1.7 | 298.7 ± 29.8 | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 18.8 ± 5.0 | 69.9 ± 21.3 | 7.5 ± 1.9 |
| 6 | Basilique | 7.1 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 1.4 | 436.0 ± 13.8 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 19.6 ± 7.9 | 78.0 ± 15.7 | 1.3 ± 0.5 |
| 7 | INP-HB | 7.3 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 1.5 | 382.8 ± 53.6 | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 23.1 ± 5.6 | 24.1 ± 12.6 | 70.3 ± 29.8 | 2.7 ± 0.7 |
| 8 | Lycée Scient. | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 436.0 ± 13.8 | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 10.7 ± 2.0 | 25.0 ± 11.3 | 75.1 ± 25.6 | 1.9 ± 0.6 |
| 9 | CIE | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 2.1 | 396.8 ± 151.5 | 8.2 ± 5.5 | 6.7 ± 6.8 | 39.3 ± 5.8 | 65.3 ± 19.8 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
Physico-chemical parameters characteristic in rainy season (mean, standard deviation).
| Sample Site | Location | pH | DO (mg/L) | Cond (μS/cm) | NO3− (mg/L) | NH4+ (mg/L) | BOD5 (mg/L) | COD (mg/L) | TNK (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guiglo | 6.8 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 252.3 ±27.9 | 1.0 ± 1.6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 18.2 ± 2.3 | 43.7 ± 4.3 | 1.5 ± 0.3 |
| 2 | Presidence | 7.7 ± 1.0 | 4.1 ± 1.5 | 247.2 ± 20.6 | 0.8 ± 1.4 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 30.6 ± 3.9 | 74.0 ± 18.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| 3 | Ngokro | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 2.4 | 258.3 ± 46.0 | 7.9 ± 8.5 | 1.2 ± 2.1 | 26.5 ± 4.3 | 43.6 ± 6.9 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| 4 | Cyclone | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 3.6 ± 1.0 | 342.2 ± 35.2 | 0.6 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 31.4 ± 6.3 | 58.7 ± 16.8 | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
| 5 | CHR | 7.5 ± 0.4 | 3.1 ± 2.1 | 325.2 ±15.1 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 20.4 ± 4.1 | 51.9 ± 16.0 | 1.5 ± 0.3 |
| 6 | Basilique | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 362.5 ± 41.7 | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 8.0 ± 6.6 | 22.9 ± 3.4 | 42.4 ± 8.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 |
| 7 | INP-HB | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 10.4 | 291.5 ± 151.3 | 2.6 ± 2.2 | 33.4 ± 17.2 | 39.0 ± 13.9 | 85.4 ± 18.5 | 3.0 ± 1.5 |
| 8 | Lycée Scient. | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 11.0 | 433.3 ± 26.5 | 1.7 ± 2.1 | 13.5 ± 8.5 | 41.9 ± 14.7 | 118.0 ± 30.2 | 1.9 ± 0.5 |
| 9 | CIE | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 2.1 | 396.8 ± 151.5 | 8.2 ± 5.5 | 6.7 ± 1.8 | 21.3 ± 5.8 | 77.1 ± 35.8 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
Figure 4Proportion of households reporting disease occurrences in the past 2 years in settlements of Yamoussoukro.
Typhoid dynamics, risk factors related to urban waste management in Yamoussoukro.
| Characteristic 1 | Healthy 2 | Diseased 3 | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Poor/common | 57% (184) | 68% (78) | Ref. | ||
| economic/residential | 43% (137) | 32% (36) | 0.6 | 0.4–1.0 | 0.04 |
|
| |||||
| Above 200 | 40% (58) | 42% (22) | Ref. | ||
| 100 to 200 | 45% (65) | 34% (18) | 0.7 | 0.4–1.5 | 0.39 |
| Below 100 | 16% (23) | 25% (13) | 1.5 | 0.6–3.4 | 0.35 |
|
| |||||
| Tap | 68% (232) | 73% (88) | Ref. | ||
| Well | 29% (99) | 26% (31) | 0.8 | 0.5–1.3 | 0.43 |
| Excl. resale | 3% (10) | 2% (2) | 0.5 | 0.1–2.1 | 0.41 |
|
| |||||
| Septic tank | 59% (203) | 51% (62) | Ref. | ||
| Dry latrine | 38% (131) | 44% (54) | 1.3 | 0.9–2.1 | 0.17 |
| None | 3% (11) | 5% (6) | 1.8 | 0.6–4.9 | 0.27 |
|
| |||||
| Street | 33% (113) | 41% (50) | ref | ||
| Septic tank | 10% (35) | 9% (11) | 0.7 | 0.3–1.5 | 0.37 |
| Open drainage | 18% (61) | 11% (13) | 0.5 | 0.2–0.9 | 0.04 |
| Other | 39% (136) | 39% (48) | 0.8 | 0.5–1.3 | 0.34 |
|
| |||||
| Inside home | 74% (240) | 70% (78) | Ref. | ||
| Outside home | 26% (83) | 30% (33) | 1.2 | 0.8–2.0 | 0.41 |
Notes: Characteristic, described the risk factor assessed in the study; Healthy, the percentage of the healthy people in surveyed households; Disease, the percentage of the sick people in the surveyed households. Ref. indicates reference.
Malaria dynamics, risk factors related to urban waste management in Yamoussoukro.
| Characteristic | Healthy | Diseased | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| poor/common | 61% (43) | 60% (221) | Ref. | ||
| economic/residential | 39% (27) | 40% (147) | 1.1 | 0.6–1.8 | 0.83 |
|
| |||||
| above 200 | 41% (13) | 40% (67) | Ref. | ||
| 100 to 200 | 47% (15) | 40% (68) | 0.9 | 0.4–2.0 | 0.76 |
| below 100 | 12% (4) | 20% (33) | 1.6 | 0.5–6.0 | 0.44 |
|
| |||||
| Tap | 66% (50) | 70% (272) | Ref. | ||
| Well | 30% (23) | 28% (108) | 0.9 | 0.5–1.5 | 0.59 |
| excl. resale | 4% (3) | 2% (9) | 0.6 | 0.2–2.6 | 0.38 |
|
| |||||
| Septic tank | 69% (53) | 54% (213) | Ref. | ||
| Dry latrine | 29% (22) | 42% (165) | 1.9 | 1.1–3.3 | 0.02 |
| None | 3% (2) | 4% (15) | 1.9 | 0.5–12.1 | 0.42 |
|
| |||||
| Street | 34% (26) | 35% (138) | Ref. | ||
| Septic tank | 10% (8) | 10% (38) | 0.9 | 0.4–2.3 | 0.8 |
| Open drainage | 17% (13) | 16% (62) | 0.9 | 0.4–1.9 | 0.77 |
| Other | 39% (30) | 39% (155) | 1 | 0.6–1.7 | 0.93 |
|
| |||||
| Inside home | 66% (49) | 75% (271) | Ref. | ||
| Outside home | 34% (25) | 25% (92) | 0.7 | 0.4–1.2 | 0.14 |
Diarrhoea dynamics, risk factors related to urban waste management in Yamoussoukro.
| Characteristic | Healthy | Diseased | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| poor/common | 58% (176) | 65% (86) | Ref. | ||
| economic/residential | 42% (127) | 35% (46) | 0.7 | 0.5–1.1 | 0.17 |
|
| |||||
| above 200 | 40% (52) | 41% (28) | Ref. | ||
| 100 to 200 | 45% (59) | 35% (24) | 0.8 | 0.4–1.5 | 0.41 |
| below 100 | 15% (19) | 25% (17) | 1.7 | 0.7–3.7 | 0.21 |
|
| |||||
| Tap | 68% (219) | 71% (101) | Ref. | ||
| Well | 28% (91) | 27% (39) | 0.9 | 0.6–1.4 | 0.75 |
| excl. resale | 3% (10) | 1% (2) | 0.4 | 0.1–1.7 | 0.29 |
|
| |||||
| Septic tank | 61% (197) | 47% (68) | Ref. | ||
| Dry latrine | 35% (114) | 49% (71) | 1.8 | 1.2–2.7 | 0.004 |
| None | 4% (12) | 3% (5) | 1.2 | 0.4–3.4 | 0.73 |
|
| |||||
| Street | 32% (102) | 42% (61) | Ref. | ||
| Septic tank | 10% (33) | 9% (13) | 0.7 | 0.3–1.3 | 0.25 |
| Open drainage | 17% (54) | 14% (20) | 0.6 | 0.3–1.1 | 0.12 |
| Other | 41% (134) | 35% (50) | 0.6 | 0.4–1.0 | 0.04 |
|
| |||||
| Inside home | 73% (222) | 74% (96) | Ref. | ||
| Outside home | 27% (83) | 26% (33) | 0.9 | 0.6–1.5 | 0.73 |