Literature DB >> 25279388

TEXTING WHILE DRIVING: EVALUATION OF GLANCE DISTRIBUTIONS FOR FREQUENT/INFREQUENT TEXTERS AND KEYPAD/TOUCHPAD TEXTERS.

Siby Samuel, Alexander Pollatsek, Donald Fisher.   

Abstract

The threat that cell-phones pose to driving has been a well researched topic. There are fewer studies of the threat that texting creates for drivers, but the risks are obvious and the few existing studies confirm this. What is not obvious is whether frequent texters will expose themselves to the same risks as infrequent texters. This is important to know because many texters, especially teens who text frequently, may consider themselves immune to the dangers of texting while driving. As such, a comparison of frequent and infrequent texters was undertaken on a driving simulator. It is also not immediately clear what effects the different types of interfaces have on driving performance while text messaging. The interfaces under evaluation included keypad or "qwerty" phones (e.g., Blackberries) and touchpad phones (iPhone). It was found that the frequent and infrequent texters were equally likely to glance at least once for more than 2s inside the vehicle while sending a text message. It was also found that touchpad texters had a larger number of glances above the 2s threshold than keypad users, though this difference was not significant. The implications of this for future public policy are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 25279388      PMCID: PMC4180083          DOI: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des


  8 in total

1.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; William A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-03

2.  A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; Dennis J Crouch
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques.

Authors:  William J Horrey; Christopher D Wickens
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Technology and teen drivers.

Authors:  John D Lee
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2007-03-26

5.  Text messaging during simulated driving.

Authors:  Frank A Drews; Hina Yazdani; Celeste N Godfrey; Joel M Cooper; David L Strayer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  A simulator evaluation of the effects of attention maintenance training on glance distributions of younger novice drivers inside and outside the vehicle.

Authors:  Gautam Divekar; Anuj K Pradhan; Kathleen M Masserang; Ian Reagan; Alexander Pollatsek; Donald L Fisher
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  Phone use and crashes while driving: A representative survey of drivers in two Australian states.

Authors:  Suzanne P McEvoy; Mark R Stevenson; Mark Woodward
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006 Dec 4-18       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  The effects of focused attention training on the duration of novice drivers' glances inside the vehicle.

Authors:  A K Pradhan; G Divekar; K Masserang; M Romoser; T Zafian; R D Blomberg; F D Thomas; I Reagan; M Knodler; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.778

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.