| Literature DB >> 25279257 |
Charlotte R Hurry1, Daniel J Schmidt1, Mark Ponniah1, Giovannella Carini1, David Blair2, Jane M Hughes1.
Abstract
Comparative phylogeography of commensal species may show congruent patterns where the species involved share a common history. Temnosewellia is a genus of flatworms, members of which live in commensal relationships with host freshwater crustaceans. By constructing phylogenetic trees based on mitochondrial COI and 28S nuclear ribosomal gene sequences, this study investigated how evolutionary history has shaped patterns of intraspecific molecular variation in two such freshwater commensals. This study concentrates on the flatworm Temnosewellia albata and its critically endangered crayfish host Euastacus robertsi, which have a narrow climatically-restricted distribution on three mountaintops. The genetic data expands upon previous studies of Euastacus that suggested several vicariance events have led to the population subdivision of Euastacus robertsi. Further, our study compared historical phylogeographic patterning of these species. Our results showed that phylogeographic patterns shared among these commensals were largely congruent, featuring a shared history of limited dispersal between the mountaintops. Several hypotheses were proposed to explain the phylogeographic points of differences between the species. This study contributes significantly to understanding evolutionary relationships of commensal freshwater taxa.Entities:
Keywords: Comparative phylogeography; Crustaceans; Dispersal; Fragmented habitat; Haplotype sharing; Headwater; Invertebrates
Year: 2014 PMID: 25279257 PMCID: PMC4179389 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Map of north east Queensland, Australia which shows the three mountaintop habitats (▴) of Euastacus robertsi and Temnosewellia albata.
GenBank accession numbers for Temnosewellia species.
All sequences were generated as part of this study.
| Species & molecular | Haplotype ID & GenBank | Mountaintop location |
|---|---|---|
| TEM_FI1; | Mt Finnigan/Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_FI2; | Mt Finnigan | |
| TEM_FI3; | Mt Finnigan | |
| TEM_FI4; | Mt Finnigan/Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_FI5; | Mt Finnigan | |
| TEM_PB1; | Mt Pieter Botte | |
| TEM_PB2; | Mt Pieter Botte | |
| TEM_TP10 (D Blair); | Mt Finnigan | |
| TEM_TP7; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP2; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP3; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP8; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP9; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP4; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP5; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP6; | Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_TP1; | Thornton Peak | |
| 530FR (D.Blair); | Mt Lewis | |
| TEM_1; | Mt Finnigan/Thornton Peak | |
| TEM_2; | Mt Pieter Botte/Thornton Peak |
Comparison of genetic diversity between Temnosewellia albata and Euastacus robertsi.
| Species name and molecular marker |
| Haplotypes |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 17 | 0.89 | 0.071 | 91 | |
| 8 | 2 | 0.57 | 0.0096 | 9 | |
| 64 | 6 | 0.65 | 0.023 | 31 | |
| 24 | 4 | 0.67 | 0.0076 | 12 |
Notes.
haplotype diversity
nucleotide diversity
segregating sites
GenBank accession numbers for Euastacus robertsi. All the new sequences that were generated as part of this study are highlighted in boldface type.
| Molecular | Haplotype ID & GenBank | Mountain top location |
|---|---|---|
| COI | FI-A; | Mt Finnigan/Thornton Peak |
|
| ||
| COI | FI-P; | Mt Finnigan |
| COI | TP1; | Thornton Peak |
| COI | PB1; | Mt Pieter Botte |
| COI | TP3; | Thornton Peak |
| COI | TP2; | Thornton Peak |
| 28S | F1; | Mt Finnigan/Thornton Peak |
| 28S | P1; | Mt Pieter Botte |
| 28S | T1; | Thornton Peak |
| 28S | T2; | Thornton Peak |
Figure 2Comparison of two Bayesian (BA) consensus topologies of the COI mtDNA datasets (A), and a parsimony network generated on TCS, of 28S ribosomal DNA sequence data (B).
(A) BA posterior probabilities are shown above the node. The colours represent the location where the haplotype was sampled. Numbers represent the number of individuals sampled with that haplotype. Dashed lines represent a specific linkage where flatworms were sampled from hosts with that haplotype. (B) Haplotype frequency is indicated by the circle size (smallest 1, largest 8). The circle fill colour indicates sample site. Circles on connecting lines indicate the number of base pair mutations between haplotypes.
Divergence estimates between clades (see Fig. 2A).
Comparison is between sequenced COI haplotypes, for Temnosewellia albata and Euastacus robertsi in Queensland, Australia.
| Pairwise comparison | Substitutions/site/lineage/million years | Diverged (mya) | ±95% HPD (mya) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
|
| Clade A–B | 0.0027 | 0.015 | 11 | 3.4–25 |
| Clade A–B–C | 0.0027 | 0.015 | 15 | 4.4–32 | |
|
| Clade D–E | 0.0083 | 0.012 | 2.6 | 1.5–4.3 |
Figure 3Isolation by migration model, using COI and 28S, showing the pairwise difference in divergence between three mountains.
Black line, Thornton peak & Mt Finnigan; grey line, Thornton peak & Mt Pieter Botte; dashed line, Mt Finnigan & Mt Pieter Botte.
Parameter estimates from an isolation with migration model for three pairwise mountaintop population comparison.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | Parameters | HiPt | HPD90Lo | HPD90Hi | Parameters | HiPt | HPD90Lo | HPD90Hi |
| qF | 1.702 | 0.361 | 6.448 | qF | 0.1700 | 0.0154 | 1.126 | |
| 1. Mt Finnigan | qP | 0.147 | 0.049 | 1.522 | qP | 0.0163 | 0.0163 | 0.992 |
| – | qA | 44.82 | 19.75 | 103.1 | qA | 30.85 | 6.423 | 32.50 |
| 2. Mt Pieter Botte | t | 0.308 | 0.053? | 14.99? | t | 0.173 | 0.022? | 12.69? |
| mF | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.515 | mF | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.995 | |
| mP | 0.005 | 0.005 | 1.285 | mP | 0.005 | 0.005 | 1.355 | |
| qF | 0.965 | 0.170 | 4.596 | qF | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.86 | |
| 1. Mt Finnigan | qT | 3.440 | 0.313 | 41.802 | qT | 1.661 | 0.2518 | 7.100 |
| – | qA | 38.46 | 13.03? | 103.1 | qA | 27.545 | 10.52? | 91.49? |
| 2. Thornton Peak | t | 0.878 | 0.068? | 7.238? | t | 0.6225 | 0.0375? | 14.99? |
| mF | 0.005 | 0.005? | 8.325? | mF | 0.005 | 0.0050? | 5.755? | |
| mT | 1.225 | 0.005 | 7.27 | mT | 0.275 | 0.015 | 3.855 | |
| qT | 3.563 | 0.6600 | 16.75 | qT | 3.020 | 0.3583 | 16.63 | |
| 1. Thornton Peak | qP | 0.087 | 0.087 | 1.478 | qP | 0.0217 | 0.0217 | 0.5852 |
| – | qA | 49.21 | 13.03? | 171.6? | qA | 23.18 | 8.446 | 89.94 |
| 2. Mt Pieter Botte | t | 0.292 | 0.068? | 7.328? | t | 0.5175 | 0.0225? | 14.99? |
| mT | 0.055 | 0.005 | 1.685 | mT | 0.265 | 0.005 | 3.565 | |
| mP | 0.005 | 0.0050? | 5.845 | mP | 0.005 | 0.0050? | 8.795? | |
Notes.
the value of the bin with the highest count
lower bound of the estimated 90% highest posterior density (HPD) interval. A question mark ‘?’ indicates unreliable or limit due to flat or incomplete posterior probability distribution sampled
upper bound of the estimated 90% highest posterior density (HPD) interval
the effective population size, population indicated by the letter (F, T, P)
ancestral population
the migration rate per gene copy per generation, letters indicate the population (F, T, P)
a divergence estimate (not transformed to years)