Literature DB >> 25278892

Correlation of posterior occipitocervical angle and surgical outcomes for occipitocervical fusion.

Christopher M Maulucci1, George M Ghobrial1, Ashwini D Sharan1, James S Harrop1, Jack I Jallo1, Alexander R Vaccaro2, Srinivas K Prasad1.   

Abstract

Study Type Retrospective cohort study. Introduction Craniocervical instability is a surgical disease, most commonly due to rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, erosive pathologies such as tumors and infection, and advanced degeneration. Treatment involves stabilization of the craniovertebral junction by occipitocervical instrumentation and fusion. However, the impact of the fixed occipitocervical angle on surgical outcomes, in particular the need for revision surgery and the incidence of dysphagia, remains unknown. Occipitocervical fusions (OCFs) at a single institution were reviewed to evaluate the relationships between postoperative neck alignment, the need for revision surgery, and dysphagia. Objective The objective of this study is to determine whether an increased posterior occipital cervical angle results in an increase in the need for revision surgery, and secondary, dysphagia. Methods A retrospective review of spinal surgery patients from January 2007 to June 2013 was conducted searching for patients who underwent an occipitocervical instrumented fusion utilizing diagnostic and procedural codes. Specifically, a current procedural code of 22590 (arthrodesis, posterior technique [craniocervical]) was queried, as well those with a description of "craniocervical" or "occipitocervical" arthrodesis. Ideal neck alignment before rod placement was judged by the attending surgeon. A review of all cases for revision surgery or evidence of dysphagia was then conducted. Results From January 2007 to June 2013, 107 patients were identified (31 male, 76 female, mean age 63). Rheumatoid arthritis causing myelopathy was the most common indication for OCF, followed by trauma. Twenty of the patients were lost to follow-up and seven died within the perioperative period. Average follow-up for the remaining 80 patients was 16.4 months. The mean posterior occipitocervical angle (POCA), defined as the angle formed by the intersection of a line drawn tangential to the posterior aspect of the occipital protuberance and a line determined by the posterior aspect of the facets of the third and fourth cervical vertebrae, calculated after stabilization, was 107.1 degrees (range, 72-140 degrees). Reoperation was required in 11 patients (11/107, 10.3%). The mean POCA for the reoperation group was 109.5 degrees (range, 72-123) and was not significantly different than patients not requiring reoperation (106.5, p > 0.05). However, for all pathologies excluding infection as a cause for reoperation, the mean POCA was significantly higher, 115.14 degrees (p = 0.039) (Table 1). Seven patients (6.5%) complained of dysphagia postoperatively with a significantly higher POCA of 115 degrees (p = 0.039). Of these seven patients, six underwent posterior-only procedures. One patient underwent anterior and posterior procedures for a severe kyphotic deformity. The dysphagia resolved in six patients over a mean of 3 weeks (range, 2-4 weeks). One patient, whose surgery was posterior only, required the insertion of a gastrostomy tube. Conclusions An elevated POCA may result in need for reoperation due to increased biomechanical stress upon adjacent segments or the construct itself due to flexion in an attempt to maintain forward gaze. Further, an elevated POCA seems to also correlate with a higher incidence of dysphagia. Further investigation is necessary to determine the ideal craniocervical angle which is likely individualized to a particular patient based on global and regional spinal alignments.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25278892      PMCID: PMC4174182          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1386756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J        ISSN: 1663-7976


Note: When patients who underwent revision surgery for reasons other than infection (adjacent segment degeneration or instrumentation failure), a significantly higher POCA (115 degrees, n = 0.039) was found.
Table 1

Comparison of occipitocervical fusion patient groups

RevisionNo revision p
N 11 (10%)96 (89%)
POCAMean: 109.5Range: 72–123Mean: 107.1Range: 85–1410.23
Revision (excluding infection as indication)No revision
Adjacent level disease2 (1.8%)
Instrumentation failure5 (4.7%)
Total7 (6.5%)94 (88%)
POCA (degrees)Mean: 115Range: 80–136Mean: 107.1Range: 85–1410.039

Note: When patients who underwent revision surgery for reasons other than infection (adjacent segment degeneration or instrumentation failure), a significantly higher POCA (115 degrees, n = 0.039) was found.

  25 in total

Review 1.  Indications for surgery and stabilization techniques of the occipito-cervical junction.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; Moe R Lim; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Measurement of a posterior occipitocervical fusion angle.

Authors:  Ryan U Riel; Matthew C Lee; John S Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-02

3.  Long-term maintenance of cervical alignment after occipitocervical and atlantoaxial screw fixation in young children.

Authors:  Richard C E Anderson; Peter Kan; Wayne M Gluf; Douglas L Brockmeyer
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Rigid occipitocervical fixation: indications, outcomes, and complications in the modern era.

Authors:  Robin Bhatia; Ruth M Desouza; Jonathan Bull; Adrian T H Casey
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-02-22

5.  Results of a longer than 10-year follow-Up of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by occipitocervical fusion.

Authors:  S Matsunaga; K Ijiri; H Koga
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Clinical course of conservatively managed rheumatoid arthritis patients with myelopathy.

Authors:  N Sunahara; S Matsunaga; T Mori; K Ijiri; T Sakou
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Neuropathology of the brainstem and spinal cord in end stage rheumatoid arthritis: implications for treatment.

Authors:  F C Henderson; J F Geddes; H A Crockard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Craniocervical junction instability: instrumentation and fusion with titanium rods and sublaminar wires. Effectiveness and failures in personal experience.

Authors:  M Visocchi; F Di Rocco; M Meglio
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Occipitocervical reconstruction with the Ohio Medical Instruments Loop: results of a multicenter evaluation in 30 cases.

Authors:  Sheila K Singh; Lynda Rickards; Ronald I Apfelbaum; R John Hurlbert; Dennis Maiman; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Occipitocervical fusion with rigid internal fixation: long-term follow-up data in 69 patients.

Authors:  Russ P Nockels; Christopher I Shaffrey; Adam S Kanter; Syed Azeem; Julie E York
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Occipitocervical inclination: new radiographic parameter of neutral occipitocervical position.

Authors:  Seong-Dae Yoon; Chang-Hwa Lee; Jiwoon Lee; Ji-Yeon Choi; Woo-Kie Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of hinged and contoured rods for occipitocervical arthrodesis in adults: A clinical study.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Brian J Dlouhy; Alejandro J Lopez; Arnold H Menezes; Patrick W Hitchon; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

3.  Posterior occipito cervical decompression with fixation and fusion in Cranio vertebral junction compression.

Authors:  Lal Rehman; Iram Bokhari; Ali Afzal; Shakeel Ahmad
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Influence of neck postural changes on cervical spine motion and angle during swallowing.

Authors:  Jun Young Kim; Jae Taek Hong; Joo Seon Oh; Ashish Jain; Il Sup Kim; Seong Hoon Lim; Jun Sung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Importance of the Occipitoaxial Angle and Posterior Occipitocervical Angle in Occipitocervical Fusion.

Authors:  Chao Tang; Guang Zhou Li; Ye Hui Liao; Qiang Tang; Fei Ma; Qing Wang; De Jun Zhong
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Correlation between kinematic sagittal parameters of the cervical lordosis or head posture and disc degeneration in patients with posterior neck pain.

Authors:  Hyo Jeong Lee; Dae Geun Jeon; Jung Hyun Park
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-01-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.