Literature DB >> 25277730

[Shortening deformities of the clavicle after diaphyseal clavicular fractures : Influence on patient-oriented assessment of shoulder function].

A Jubel1, G Schiffer2, J Andermahr3, C Ries4, C Faymonville4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the evaluation of patient-oriented outcome scores for shoulder function and residual complaints after diaphyseal clavicular fractures with respect to shortening deformities.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was based on data of 172 adult patients (mean age 39 ± 14 years) with healed clavicular fractures treated operatively (n = 104) or conservatively (n = 67). The control population consisted of 35 healthy adults without shoulder problems and 25 patients with nonunion after conservative treatment. The subjective estimation of the level of pain was collated on a visual analog scale (VAS 1-100 points), together with the relative Constant and Murley score, the Cologne clavicle score, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and a bilateral comparison of the length difference of the clavicles.
RESULTS: Patients with a clavicular length difference of > 2 cm had significantly (p < 0.001) more pain, a greater loss of mobility and significantly lower values in the scoring system of Constant and Murley, the DASH and Cologne clavicle scores compared to patients with clavicular length differences < 0.5 cm and healthy controls (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that shortening deformities after clavicular fractures in adults have a large impact on the functional result and patient-oriented outcome scores. The aim of the therapy of diaphyseal clavicular fractures should therefore concentrate on reconstruction of the anatomical length of the clavicle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical length; Clavicle score; Functional result; Patient-oriented assessment; Surgical treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25277730     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-014-2648-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  29 in total

1.  Malunion of the clavicle causes significant glenoid malposition: a quantitative anatomic investigation.

Authors:  Jonas Andermahr; Axel Jubel; Andreas Elsner; Axel Prokop; Prokopios Tsikaras; Jesse Jupiter; Juergen Koebke
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.

Authors:  Michael D McKee; Elizabeth M Pedersen; Caroline Jones; David J G Stephen; Hans J Kreder; Emil H Schemitsch; Lisa M Wild; Jeffrey Potter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation.

Authors:  F L Allman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Does shortening matter after clavicular fractures?

Authors:  P K Oroko; M Buchan; A Winkler; I G Kelly
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  1999

7.  Management of midclavicular fractures: comparison between nonoperative treatment and open intramedullary fixation in 80 patients.

Authors:  F A Grassi; M S Tajana; F D'Angelo
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-06

8.  [Treatment of mid-clavicular fractures in adults. Early results after rucksack bandage or elastic stable intramedullary nailing].

Authors:  A Jubel; J Andermahr; A Prokop; J I Lee; G Schiffer; K E Rehm
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Outcome of clavicular fracture in 89 patients.

Authors:  A Eskola; S Vainionpää; P Myllynen; H Pätiälä; P Rokkanen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986

10.  Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: the relevance of shortening and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Stefanos Lazarides; George Zafiropoulos
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Complications after intramedullary stabilization of clavicle fractures].

Authors:  Alexander Eickhoff; Maximilian Fischer; Florian Gebhard; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Quantifying shortening of the fractured clavicle assuming clavicular symmetry is unreliable.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Anand Appalsamy; Sebastiaan Franken; Albert van Kampen; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Reliability of measurements of the fractured clavicle: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Gerjon Hannink; Arnoud R van Geene; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-03

4.  Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Peter van Schie; Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-20

5.  Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Arnoud van Geene; Udo Gundlach; Abel Wei; Nico Verdonschot; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-18

6.  Can Upstream Patient Education Improve Fracture Care in a Digital World? Use of a Decision Aid for the Treatment of Displaced Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures.

Authors:  Cara H Lai; Malcolm R DeBaun; Noelle Van Rysselberghe; Geoffrey D Abrams; Robin N Kamal; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.884

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.