Literature DB >> 25277706

Hypotension does not always make computed tomography scans unfeasible in the management of blunt abdominal trauma patients.

Chih-Yuan Fu1, Shang-Ju Yang2, Chien-Hung Liao3, Being-Chuan Lin4, Shih-Ching Kang5, Shang-Yu Wang6, Kuo-Ching Yuan7, Chun-Hsiang Ouyang8, Yu-Pao Hsu9.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) scans have been used worldwide to evaluate patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). However, CT scans have traditionally been considered to be a part of a secondary survey that can only be performed after the patient's haemodynamics have stabilised. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the role of the CT scan in managing BAT patients with hypotension.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who fulfilled the criteria for a major torso injury in our institution were treated according to the Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines. The selection of diagnostic modalities for patients with stable and unstable haemodynamics was discussed. Furthermore, patients with hypotension after resuscitation who were administered haemostasis procedures were the focus of our analysis. We also delineated the influence of CT scans on the time interval between arrival and definitive treatment for these patients.
RESULTS: During the study period, 909 patients were enrolled in this study. Ninety-one patients (10.0%, 91/909) had a systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90mmHg after resuscitation. Fifty-eight of the patients (63.7%) received CT scans before they received definitive treatment. There was no significant difference in the CT scan application rate between the patients with and without hypotension after resuscitation (63.7% vs. 68.8%, p=0.382). Among the 79 patients with hypotension after resuscitation who underwent a haemostasis procedure (surgery or angioembolisation), there was no significant difference in the time between arrival and definitive haemostasis between the patients who received CT scans and those who did not (surgery: 57.8 (standard deviation (SD) 6.4) vs. 61.6 (SD 14.5)min, p=0.218; angioembolisation: [147.0 (SD 33.4) vs. 139.3 (SD 16.7)min, p=0.093).
CONCLUSION: The traditional priority of diagnostic modalities used to manage BAT patients should be reconsidered because of advancements in facilities and understanding of BAT. With shorter scanning times and transportation distances, hypotension does not always make performing a CT scan unfeasible.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blunt abdominal trauma; Computed tomography scan; Hypotension

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25277706     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  3 in total

1.  The Diminishing Role of Pelvic Stability Evaluation in the Era of Computed Tomographic Scanning.

Authors:  Chih-Yuan Fu; Lan-Hsuan Teng; Chien-Hung Liao; Yu-Pao Hsu; Shang-Yu Wang; Ling-Wei Kuo; Kuo-Ching Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 2.  Definition of hemodynamic stability in blunt trauma patients: a systematic review and assessment amongst Dutch trauma team members.

Authors:  S A I Loggers; T W A Koedam; G F Giannakopoulos; E Vandewalle; M Erwteman; W P Zuidema
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Computed tomography during initial management and mortality among hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yusuke Tsutsumi; Shingo Fukuma; Asuka Tsuchiya; Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue; Yosuke Yamamoto; Sayaka Shimizu; Miho Kimachi; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.