Literature DB >> 25277430

Understanding sperm heterogeneity: biological and practical implications.

M Ramón1, P Jiménez-Rabadán, O García-Álvarez, A Maroto-Morales, A J Soler, M R Fernández-Santos, M D Pérez-Guzmán, J J Garde.   

Abstract

Sperm are the most diverse cell type known. This diversity is thought to reflect adaptation to conditions under which sperm function as a way to ensure the survival of sperm in fertilization environments and to maximize fertilizing capacity thereof. The existence of morphological diversity among species is widely assumed, although this diversity seems less clear as we go deeper (between males, between ejaculates from the same male and even within the same ejaculate), with different theories addressing this heterogeneity. Moreover, the development of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) has led to changes in the physiological conditions in which sperm fertilize, which could lead, ultimately, to a selection towards more favourable sperm design. Regardless of the origin of this diversity, when studying the relationship between shape and function of sperm, it is advisable to assess the degree of heterogeneity of sperm and takes into account to be more likely to identify those morphological characteristics determining the fertile ability of sperm. Otherwise, these relationships could be hidden as a result of considering an average shape not representative of morphological characteristics of sperm. In addition, the knowledge of this morphological diversity in terms of changes arising from modifications in the sperm environment and mechanisms that generate these changes could be useful for understanding the reproductive capacity of males but also in enhancing their fertile ability.
© 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25277430     DOI: 10.1111/rda.12404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim        ISSN: 0936-6768            Impact factor:   2.005


  10 in total

1.  Foreword to Sperm morphometrics today and tomorrow special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology.

Authors:  Carles Soler; Trevor G Cooper
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Mouse spermatozoa with higher fertilization rates have thinner nuclei.

Authors:  Daisuke Mashiko; Masahito Ikawa; Koichi Fujimoto
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Sperm selection by thermotaxis improves ICSI outcome in mice.

Authors:  Serafín Pérez-Cerezales; Ricardo Laguna-Barraza; Alejandro Chacón de Castro; María Jesús Sánchez-Calabuig; Esther Cano-Oliva; Francisco Javier de Castro-Pita; Luis Montoro-Buils; Eva Pericuesta; Raúl Fernández-González; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Suppression of Non-Random Fertilization by MHC Class I Antigens.

Authors:  Junki Kamiya; Woojin Kang; Keiichi Yoshida; Ryota Takagi; Seiya Kanai; Maito Hanai; Akihiro Nakamura; Mitsutoshi Yamada; Yoshitaka Miyamoto; Mami Miyado; Yoko Kuroki; Yoshiki Hayashi; Akihiro Umezawa; Natsuko Kawano; Kenji Miyado
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Single-molecule long-read sequencing reveals a conserved intact long RNA profile in sperm.

Authors:  Yu H Sun; Anqi Wang; Chi Song; Goutham Shankar; Rajesh K Srivastava; Kin Fai Au; Xin Zhiguo Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Blocking NHE Channels Reduces the Ability of In Vitro Capacitated Mammalian Sperm to Respond to Progesterone Stimulus.

Authors:  Marc Yeste; Sandra Recuero; Carolina Maside; Albert Salas-Huetos; Sergi Bonet; Elisabeth Pinart
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Relationship between Fertility Traits and Kinematics in Clusters of Boar Ejaculates.

Authors:  Vinicio Barquero; Eduardo R S Roldan; Carles Soler; Bernardo Vargas-Leitón; Francisco Sevilla; Marlen Camacho; Anthony Valverde
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28

8.  Lectin binding of human sperm associates with DEFB126 mutation and serves as a potential biomarker for subfertility.

Authors:  Aijie Xin; Li Cheng; Hua Diao; Yancheng Wu; Shumin Zhou; Changgen Shi; Yangyang Sun; Peng Wang; Shiwei Duan; Jufen Zheng; Bin Wu; Yao Yuan; Yihua Gu; Guowu Chen; Xiaoxi Sun; Huijuan Shi; Shengce Tao; Yonglian Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Current status and potential of morphometric sperm analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Maroto-Morales; Olga García-Álvarez; Manuel Ramón; Felipe Martínez-Pastor; M Rocío Fernández-Santos; A Josefa Soler; José Julián Garde
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Dog sperm head morphometry: its diversity and evolution.

Authors:  Carles Soler; Ana Alambiaga; Maria A Martí; Almudena García-Molina; Anthony Valverde; Jesús Contell; Marcos Campos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.