Literature DB >> 25277335

Efficacy of an Embolic Protection Stent as a Function of Delay to Reperfusion in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the MASTER Trial).

Dariusz Dudek1, Sorin J Brener2, Tomasz Rakowski3, Artur Dziewierz3, Alexandre Abizaid4, Sigmund Silber5, Elad Yaacoby6, José M Dizon7, Ricardo A Costa4, Akiko Maehara8, Ovidiu Dressler9, Gregg W Stone8.   

Abstract

The ability of stent implantation to improve indexes of reperfusion may depend on the time to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and may also vary with stent type. The purpose of this prespecified analysis from the randomized MGUARD for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion trial was to evaluate the impact of delay to reperfusion on outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with the MGuard embolic protection stent or standard metallic stents. A total of 431 patients were divided according to symptom-onset-to-balloon time (SBT) into 2 groups: SBT ≤3 hours (167 patients; 39%) and SBT >3 hours (264 patients; 61%). Complete ST-segment resolution (STR) after percutaneous coronary intervention was more often achieved in patients with shorter SBT (58.6% vs 47%, p = 0.02). At 1 year, the all-cause mortality rate was lower in patients with shorter SBT (0% vs 3.5%, p = 0.02). STR was achieved in 58% of MGuard patients and in 45% of the control stent patients (p = 0.008). STR was 57% in the MGuard group versus 38% in the control group (p = 0.002 for SBT >3 hours) and 60% versus 57% (p = 0.72), respectively, for SBT ≤3 hours (p for interaction = 0.11). In conclusion, longer delay to mechanical reperfusion remains an important factor negatively influencing outcomes in patients with STEMI. Use of the MGuard embolic protection stent compared with conventional metallic stents resulted in superior rates of complete STR, even in patients with longer delays to reperfusion.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25277335     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

Review 1.  The MGuard coronary stent: safety, efficacy, and clinical utility.

Authors:  Montserrat Gracida; Rafael Romaguera; Francisco Jacobi; Joan A Gómez-Hospital; Angel Cequier
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2015-09-18

2.  Establishment and validation of a risk model for prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary PCI.

Authors:  Nan Gao; Xiaoyong Qi; Yi Dang; Yingxiao Li; Gang Wang; Xiao Liu; Ning Zhu; Jinguo Fu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.298

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.