Literature DB >> 25276632

The (mis)use of statistics: Which test where?

Priya Ranganathan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25276632      PMCID: PMC4170540          DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.140571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Clin Res        ISSN: 2229-3485


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, I read with interest the original paper by Akhavanakbari et al. titled “Evaluation the effects of adding ketamine to morphine in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after orthopedic surgery”.[1] The authors have looked at three groups of 20 patients each and have compared pain outcomes measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Pain scores measured on the VAS are considered as ordinal data.[2] Furthermore, data in this study relates to independent, parallel groups and is not paired data. It is therefore, incorrect to use the ANOVA for repeated measures for analysis of these results. The authors should have used the Kruskal-Wallis test, which is the non-parametric equivalent of the one-way ANOVA. Parametric tests are less conservative and tend to give significant results in comparison to their non-parametric alternatives.[2] Inappropriate application of these tests for data, which is not normally distributed will lead to erroneously significant results.
  2 in total

1.  Which is the correct statistical test to use?

Authors:  Evie McCrum-Gardner
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  Evaluation the effects of adding ketamine to morphine in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Godrat Akhavanakbari; Ali Mohamadian; Masood Entezariasl
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2014-04
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Visual analog scale: Verify appropriate statistics.

Authors:  S Kannan; S Gowri
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.