| Literature DB >> 25276181 |
Es ׳hagh Esfandi1, Vahid Ramezani2, Alireza Vatanara1, Abdolhossein Rouholamini Najafabadi1, Seyyed Pouya Hadipour Moghaddam1.
Abstract
Clarithromycin (CLM) is a member of macrolide family with broad spectrum antibiotic activity. It is practically insoluble in water and its poor solubility is pH dependent. In this study, series of nanosuspensions containing CLM and stabilizer such as HPMC, NaCMC, polysorbate 80, poloxamer 188 and polyvinyl alcohol in various ratios were prepared using sonoprecipitation method. Briefly, CLM was dissolved in acid solution and the pH of solution was raised under sonication and the effects of different stabilizers on particle size of nanoparticles were evaluated. Characterization of nanoparticles in terms of size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, differential scanning calorimetery and dissolution studies was performed. Antimicrobial activity of CLM nanosuspension was compared with coarse powder by using an agar well diffusion method. The results showed that HPMC was more efficient in size reduction of particles and presence of HPMC E5 with ratio of 3:5 to CLM in formulation led to develop the stable nanosuspension with particle size of 340 nm. The obtained nanosuspension successfully showed enhanced dissolution rate and antimicrobial activity.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity; Clarithromycin; Nanosuspension; Solubility; Stabilizer
Year: 2014 PMID: 25276181 PMCID: PMC4177641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1molecular structure of CLM
Various formulation of nanpsuspension containing 50 mg CAM with different concentration of stabilizers.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| F1 | F2 | ||||
|
| F3 | F4 | ||||
|
| F5 | F6 | ||||
|
| F7 | F8 | ||||
|
| F9 | F10 | F11 | F12 | F13 | F14 |
|
| F15 | F16 | F17 | F18 | F19 | F20 |
|
| F21 | F22 | F23 | F24 | F25 | F26 |
Figure 3Effect of different stabilizers in ratios of 1:5 and 1:1 on CLM particle sizes and PDI
Figure 4Effect of different HPMC grades and ratios on CLM particle size and PDI
Figure 5Effect of different stabilizers on particle size of CLM during stability studies
Figure 6Effect of different stabilizers on PDI of CLM nanoparticles during stability studies
Figure 7Dissolution profile of CLM coarse suspension and nanosuspension
Figure 8SEM micrograph of CLM nanoparticles
Figure 9DSC thermogram of coarse and nanosuspension forms of CLM. A; thermogram of HPMC E5, B; lyophilized nanosuspension (F12) and C; coarse CLM powder
Inhibitory zone (mm) of formulations on microbial culture
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 27.67± 0.58 | 20.33± 0.58 | 0.00± 0.00 |
|
| 22.33± 1.53 | 16.00± 1.00 | 0.00± 0.00 |
|
| 20.33± 0.58 | 15.00± 1.00 | 0.00± 0.00 |