| Literature DB >> 25276026 |
Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to verify the effect of sideways treadmill training with and without visual blocking on the balance and gait function of patients with brain lesions. [Subjects] Twenty-four stroke and traumatic brain injury subjects participated in this study. They were divided into two groups: an experimental group (12 subjects) and a control group (12 subjects). [Methods] Each group executed a treadmill training session for 20 minutes, three times a week, for 6 weeks. The sideways gait training on the treadmill was performed with visual blocking by the experimental group and with normal vision by the control group. A Biodex Gait Trainer 2 was used to assess the gait function. It was used to measure walking speed, walking distance, step length, and stance time on each foot. The Five-Times-Sit-To-Stand test (FTSST) and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were used as balance measures.Entities:
Keywords: Brain lesions; Treadmill training; Visual block
Year: 2014 PMID: 25276026 PMCID: PMC4175247 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.1415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Descriptive characteristics of the participants (N=24)
| Variable | VBG (n1=12) | VAG (n2=12) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 8 (67%) | 9 (75%) |
| Female | 4 (33%) | 3 (25%) |
| Age (years) | 54.0±13.5a | 56.9±7.3 |
| Height (cm) | 165.6±9.4 | 165.9±6.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.2±11.2 | 67.5±6.5 |
| Time since injury (month) | 12.8±6.2 | 13.9±8.7 |
| Cause of injury | ||
| Stroke | 7 (42%) | 8 (67%) |
| TBI | 5 (58%) | 4 (33%) |
| Affected side | ||
| Right | 6 (50%) | 6 (50%) |
| Left | 6 (50%) | 6 (50%) |
| MMSE-K | 27.3±1.6 | 26.3±1.5 |
amean±SD; VBG, vision-blocked group; VAG, vision-allowed group; TBI, traumatic brain injury; MMSE-K, mini-mental state examination-Korea
Comparison of gait variables before and after sideways treadmill training (N=24)
| VBG (n1=12) | VAG (n2=12) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| FTSST (s) | 17.3±4.0 | 14.1±4.3* | 15.2±5.9 | 14.00±5.7 |
| TUG (s) | 27.4±12.9 | 22.8±10.2* | 21.0±11.2 | 17.3±10.2 |
| WS (m/s) | 1.0±0.5a | 1.2±0.6* | 1.3±0.6 | 1.5±0.8 |
| WD (M) | 84.1±44.7 | 103.5±61.9* | 109.2±53.1 | 128.9±65.8 |
| SL (cm) | ||||
| Affected | 29.9±12.8 | 34.3±11.2* | 34.8±13.3 | 39.0±14.8 |
| Unaffected | 23.8±14.0 | 31.8±11.2* | 34.3±12.8 | 40.3±15.0* |
| ST (%) | ||||
| Affected | 46.83±5.00 | 52.00±3.77* | 49.92±3.42 | 49.33±3.75 |
| Unaffected | 53.17±5.00 | 48.00±3.77* | 50.50.08±3.42 | 50.67±3.75 |
VBG, vision-blocked group; VAG, vision-allowed group; FTSST, five-times sit to stand test; TUG, timed up and go test; WS, walking speed; WD, walking distance; SL, step length; ST, stance time amean±SD, *p<0.05
Comparison of gait variables between groups after sideways treadmill training (N=24)
| VBG (n1=12) | VAG (n2=12) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FTSST (s) | −3.22±2.42 | −1.28±2.34 | |
| TUG (s) | −4.52±3.58 | −3.69±5.79 | |
| WS (m/s) | 0.04±0.04a | −0.04±0.13* | |
| WD (M) | 19.42±27.45 | 19.75±34.84 | |
| SL (cm) | |||
| Affected | 4.42±6.76 | 4.25±7.63 | |
| Unaffected | 8.00±5.86 | 6.00±9.78 | |
| ST (%) | |||
| Affected | 5.50±7.24 | −0.58±1.78* | |
| Unaffected | −5.08±6.82 | 0.58±1.78* | |
VBG, vision-blocked group; VAG, vision-allowed group; FTSST, five-times sit to stand test; TUG, timed up and go test; WS, walking speed; WD, walking distance; SL, step length; ST, stance time amean±SD, *p<0.05