OBJECTIVE: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) represents a group of inherited disorders in which abnormalities of the photoreceptors lead to progressive visual loss. Night blindness, peripheral visual field loss, and eventual total blindness represent typical visual damage of such disease. No study has previously evaluated the presence of a "latent" vestibular deficit in patients with RP. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study with caloric test, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (C-VEMPs), ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (O-VEMPs), and video head impulse test (v-HIT). SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 16 patients suffering from RP. INTERVENTION: Evaluation of vestibular dysfunction with caloric test, C-VEMPs, O-VEMPs, and the measurement of the vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) using the v-HIT. RESULTS: Only five patients with RP showed normal values in all the vestibular tests performed. Three patients had an evident deficit at the caloric test, whereas eight (50%) of them had a normal caloric test but a pathological response in at least one of the other vestibular tests performed. No patient of the study showed a bilateral otolith or ampullary dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our patients with RP unexpectedly showed pathological responses in at least one of the vestibular tests performed. Nowadays, in patients affected by RP, a vestibular diagnostic protocol must include VEMPs and v-HIT to confirm the vestibular damage and to identify selective damage of the vestibular nerve.
OBJECTIVE:Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) represents a group of inherited disorders in which abnormalities of the photoreceptors lead to progressive visual loss. Night blindness, peripheral visual field loss, and eventual total blindness represent typical visual damage of such disease. No study has previously evaluated the presence of a "latent" vestibular deficit in patients with RP. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study with caloric test, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (C-VEMPs), ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (O-VEMPs), and video head impulse test (v-HIT). SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 16 patients suffering from RP. INTERVENTION: Evaluation of vestibular dysfunction with caloric test, C-VEMPs, O-VEMPs, and the measurement of the vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) using the v-HIT. RESULTS: Only five patients with RP showed normal values in all the vestibular tests performed. Three patients had an evident deficit at the caloric test, whereas eight (50%) of them had a normal caloric test but a pathological response in at least one of the other vestibular tests performed. No patient of the study showed a bilateral otolith or ampullary dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our patients with RP unexpectedly showed pathological responses in at least one of the vestibular tests performed. Nowadays, in patients affected by RP, a vestibular diagnostic protocol must include VEMPs and v-HIT to confirm the vestibular damage and to identify selective damage of the vestibular nerve.