Literature DB >> 25275243

Is there a differential impact of parity on blood pressure by age?

Julia Dratva1, Cornelia Schneider, Christian Schindler, Daiana Stolz, Margaret Gerbase, Marco Pons, Robert Bettschart, Jean-Michel Gaspoz, Nino Künzli, Elisabeth Zemp, Nicole Probst-Hensch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In pregnancy, women experience metabolic and hemodynamic changes of potential long-term impact. Conflicting evidence exists on the impact on blood pressure (BP). We investigated the association between parity and BP in the Swiss Study on Air Pollution And Lung and Heart Disease In Adults cohort.
METHODS: Multilevel linear and logistic regression analyses were performed in 2837 women aged 30-73 years, with data on parity, number of births, BP, and doctor-diagnosed hypertension adjusting for potential confounders. Hypertension was defined as at least 140/90 mmHg, doctor diagnosed or taking relevant treatment. Stratified analyses were performed by age (<40, 40-59, and ≥60 years) and menopausal status.
RESULTS: Parous women had a mean of 2.3 pregnancies (SD 0.95, range 1-7). A total of 26% were nulliparous. Mean BP was 119/76 mmHg in nulliparous and 121/76 mmHg in parous women. Parity had a significant adverse effect on BP in women at least 60 years [SBP 5.6 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3 to 8.9; DBP 1.8 mmHg, 95% CI 0.1 to 3.6] and protective effect in women below 40 years (SBP -3.4 mmHg, 95% CI -5.8 to -1.0; DBP -0.2 mmHg, 95% CI -1.0 to 0.6). With increasing number of births, SBP (mmHg/birth; 95% CI) increased in older (1.2, 95% CI 0.2 to 2.2) and decreased in younger women (-1.6, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.5). Opposite effects of parity were also found for diagnosed hypertension. No interaction by menopausal status was found.
CONCLUSION: Our analyses yield differential effects of parity on BP in older vs. younger women. Reductions in BP in younger parous women have been described before; the opposite impact in older women is new. The findings may constitute biological mechanisms in an aging population or reflect birth cohort effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25275243     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  6 in total

1.  Association of Pregnancy Complications and Characteristics With Future Risk of Elevated Blood Pressure: The Västerbotten Intervention Program.

Authors:  Nisha I Parikh; Margareta Norberg; Erik Ingelsson; Sven Cnattingius; Ramachandran S Vasan; Magnus Domellöf; Jan Håkan Jansson; Anna-Karin Edstedt Bonamy
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  The impact of parity on life course blood pressure trajectories: the HUNT study in Norway.

Authors:  Eirin B Haug; Julie Horn; Amanda Rose Markovitz; Abigail Fraser; Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Kate Tilling; Pål Richard Romundstad; Janet Wilson Rich-Edwards; Bjørn Olav Åsvold
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Live birth/parity number and the risk of incident hypertension among parous women during over 13 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Seyyed Saeed Moazzeni; Samaneh Asgari; Fereidoun Azizi; Farzad Hadaegh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Association between Parity and Blood Pressure in Korean Women: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2010-2012.

Authors:  Miae Jang; Yeonji Lee; Jiho Choi; Beomseok Kim; Jayeon Kang; Yongchae Kim; Sewook Cho
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2015-11-20

5.  Gravidity, parity, blood pressure and mortality among women in Bangladesh from the HEALS cohort.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Shih; Molly Scannell Bryan; Faruque Parvez; Keriann Hunter Uesugi; Mohammed Shahriar; Alauddin Ahmed; Tariqul Islam; Habibul Ahsan; Maria Argos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The effect of bearing and rearing a child on blood pressure: a nationally representative instrumental variable analysis of 444 611 mothers in India.

Authors:  Felix Teufel; Pascal Geldsetzer; Nikkil Sudharsanan; Malavika Subramanyam; H Manisha Yapa; Jan-Walter De Neve; Sebastian Vollmer; Till Bärnighausen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 7.196

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.