Literature DB >> 25274947

Clinical utility of determining tumor markers in patients with signs and symptoms of cancer.

Jaume Trapé, Maria Sala, Fina Franquesa, Josep M Ordeig, Josep M Soler-Bel, Eva Bustamante, Rafael Pérez, Jordi Aligué, Jesús Montesinos, Anna Arnau, Roser Ordeig-Villanueva.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of cancer is difficult. Serum tumor markers (TM) may be useful, but it is known that a range of pathologies other than cancer can increase their concentrations and so TM data must be interpreted with caution. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of TMs in patients with signs or symptoms of cancer.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 234 patients seen at rapid diagnostic units who presented signs or symptoms suggestive of cancer. Ninety patients had wasting syndrome, 74 had pulmonary symptoms and 70 other presentations. CYFRA21-1, CEA, CA19-9, total bilirubin and creatinine were determined. The final diagnosis was obtained after 6 months' follow-up. Patients were classified according to the absence (group A) or presence (group B) of abnormal bilirubin or creatinine.
RESULTS: Of the 234 patients studied, 103 (44.0%) had tumors diagnosed. Cut-off points for each TM were calculated for a specificity of 100%. For the total group, the values were CYFRA21-1, 15 μg/L, CEA, 43.8 μg/L and CA19-9, 7428 KU/L, with an overall sensitivity of 46.6%. For group A (n=142), the following cut-off points were established: CYFRA21-1, 7.8 μg/L, CEA, 13.8 μg/L and CA19-9, 101 KU/L, obtaining a sensitivity of 68.6%. For group B (n=92), the values were the same as for the whole group, and a sensitivity of 42.4% was achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that TMs can aid diagnosis in these patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of cancer. Their sensitivity can be improved by using different cut-off points in the presence and absence of renal and hepatic dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25274947     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  3 in total

1.  Consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of medical oncology on the methodology and criteria for evaluation of circulating tumour markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  F Ayala de la Peña; B Ortiz-Muñoz; T Quintanar-Verdúguez; J D Santotoribio; S de la Cruz; J Trapé-Pujol; E Galve-Calvo; J M Augé-Fradera; J García-Gómez; Á González-Hernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Tumour Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Patients With Isolated Involuntary Weight Loss.

Authors:  Jaume Trape; Jordi Aligue; Mireia Vicente; Anna Arnau; Antonio San-Jose; Josep Ordeig; Roser Ordeig; Mariona Bonet; Andres Abril; Omar El-Boutrouki; Carolina Gonzalez-Fernandez; Maria Sala; Cristina Figols; Elisabeth Gonzalez-Garcia; Lourdes Montsant; Domingo Ruiz
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Associations of lymphocyte percentage and red blood cell distribution width with risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  Cong Ma; Xiaoyan Wang; Rui Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.