Chaochun Zhang1, Johannes A Postma2, Larry M York3, Jonathan P Lynch4. 1. Department of Plant Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, PR China Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 2. Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA IBG2, Forschungszentrum Juelich, D-52425 Juelich, Germany. 3. Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Graduate Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 4. Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA JPL4@psu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since ancient times in the Americas, maize, bean and squash have been grown together in a polyculture known as the 'three sisters'. This polyculture and its maize/bean variant have greater yield than component monocultures on a land-equivalent basis. This study shows that below-ground niche complementarity may contribute to this yield advantage. METHODS: Monocultures and polycultures of maize, bean and squash were grown in two seasons in field plots differing in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability. Root growth patterns of individual crops and entire polycultures were determined using a modified DNA-based technique to discriminate roots of different species. KEY RESULTS: The maize/bean/squash and maize/bean polycultures had greater yield and biomass production on a land-equivalent basis than the monocultures. Increased biomass production was largely caused by a complementarity effect rather than a selection effect. The differences in root crown architecture and vertical root distribution among the components of the 'three sisters' suggest that these species have different, possibly complementary, nutrient foraging strategies. Maize foraged relatively shallower, common bean explored the vertical soil profile more equally, while the root placement of squash depended on P availability. The density of lateral root branching was significantly greater for all species in the polycultures than in the monocultures. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that species differences in root foraging strategies increase total soil exploration, with consequent positive effects on the growth and yield of these ancient polycultures.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since ancient times in the Americas, maize, bean and squash have been grown together in a polyculture known as the 'three sisters'. This polyculture and its maize/bean variant have greater yield than component monocultures on a land-equivalent basis. This study shows that below-ground niche complementarity may contribute to this yield advantage. METHODS: Monocultures and polycultures of maize, bean and squash were grown in two seasons in field plots differing in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability. Root growth patterns of individual crops and entire polycultures were determined using a modified DNA-based technique to discriminate roots of different species. KEY RESULTS: The maize/bean/squash and maize/bean polycultures had greater yield and biomass production on a land-equivalent basis than the monocultures. Increased biomass production was largely caused by a complementarity effect rather than a selection effect. The differences in root crown architecture and vertical root distribution among the components of the 'three sisters' suggest that these species have different, possibly complementary, nutrient foraging strategies. Maize foraged relatively shallower, common bean explored the vertical soil profile more equally, while the root placement of squash depended on P availability. The density of lateral root branching was significantly greater for all species in the polycultures than in the monocultures. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that species differences in root foraging strategies increase total soil exploration, with consequent positive effects on the growth and yield of these ancient polycultures.
Authors: Laura M Ladwig; Scott L Collins; Amaris L Swann; Yang Xia; Michael F Allen; Edith B Allen Journal: Oecologia Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Long Li; Jianhao Sun; Fusuo Zhang; Tianwen Guo; Xingguo Bao; F Andrew Smith; Sally E Smith Journal: Oecologia Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Hannah M Schneider; Johannes A Postma; Tobias Wojciechowski; Christian Kuppe; Jonathan P Lynch Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Stephanie P Klein; Hannah M Schneider; Alden C Perkins; Kathleen M Brown; Jonathan P Lynch Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Johannes A Postma; Christian Kuppe; Markus R Owen; Nathan Mellor; Marcus Griffiths; Malcolm J Bennett; Jonathan P Lynch; Michelle Watt Journal: New Phytol Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Jorge C Berny Mier Y Teran; Enéas R Konzen; Viviana Medina; Antonia Palkovic; Andrea Ariani; Siu M Tsai; Matthew E Gilbert; P Gepts Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 4.357