| Literature DB >> 25274548 |
Karin Sundelin, Nawaf Almarzouki, Yalda Soltanpour, Anne Petersen, Madeleine Zetterberg1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to determine the 5-year incidence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) requiring Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in a representative mixed cohort of cataract patients, to determine risk factors for PCO and to investigate possible association with growth of human lens epithelial cells (HLEC) in vitro.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25274548 PMCID: PMC4190495 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Demographic and clinical characteristics of cataract patients, N = 270
| Variable | no Nd:YAG | Nd:YAG-treated |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 235) | (n = 35) | ||
|
| 75 (58.6-83.0) | 71 (44.0-81.4) | 0.022* |
|
| 157 (66.8) | 24 (68.6) | 1.00† |
|
| 48 (21.7) | 9 (25.7) | 0.66† |
|
| |||
| n (%), N = 256 | |||
|
| 7 (3.2) | 1 (2.9) | 1.00† |
|
| 17 (7.7) | 5 (14.7) | 0.188† |
|
| |||
| - Tecnis ZA9003 | 85 (36.5) | 8 (22.9) | |
| - SN60AT | 75 (32.2) | 8 (22.9) | |
| - Acrysof SN60WF | 64 (27.5) | 10 (28.6) | |
| - MA60MA | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| - Akreos Adapt | 2 (0.9) | 2 (5.7) | |
| - Akreos MI60 | 4 (1.7) | 6 (17.1) | |
| - Acrismart | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| - Hoya PY-60 AD | 1 (0.4) | 1 (2.9) | |
|
| 20 (8.5) | 3 (8.6) | 1.00† |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| n (%), N = 270 |
IOL = intraocular lens, Nd:YAG = neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet.
*Mann–Whitney U-test.
†Fisher’s exact test.
Topical anti-inflammatory treatment postoperatively in addition to 1% dexamethasone 3 times daily for 3 weeks.
Multivariate analysis of possible risk factors for requiring Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, N = 264
| Variable | Regression coefficient | Standard error | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age† | -0.044 | 0.018 | 0.957 | 0.924 – 0.991 | 0.014 |
| Male gender | -0.274 | 0.434 | 0.760 | 0.325 – 1.780 | 0.528 |
| Follow-up time | 0.153 | 0.057 | 1.165 | 1.042 – 1.303 | 0.007 |
| Hydrophobic 3-piece IOL‡ | -0.014 | 0.479 | 0.986 | 0.386 – 2.520 | 0.977 |
| Hydrophobic 1-piece IOL# | 0.014 | 0.479 | 1.014 | 0.397 – 2.592 | 0.977 |
| Hydrophilic 1-piece IOL|| | 2.246 | 0.679 | 9.448 | 2.498 – 35.737 | 0.001 |
OR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, IOL = intraocular lens.
*Binary logistic regression with Nd:YAG capsulotomy treatment as dependent variable and age, male gender, follow-time and type of IOL as covariates.
†Age at cataract surgery.
‡Tecnis ZA9003, (n = 93).
#Acrysof SN60WF/SN60AT, (n = 157).
||Akreos Adapt/Akreos MI60, (n = 14).
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival plots of eyes not requiring Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Patients are censored at the end of follow-up. For the whole study group, 268 patients were included at the beginning of the period (A). Patients were also stratified according to IOL type (B). Only IOLs used in more than one patient were included, yielding a number of 264 patients. The IOLs were then subtyped accordingly: 1) hydrophobic acrylic 3-piece IOL (Tecnis ZA9003) n = 93, 2) hydrophobic acrylic 1-piece IOLs (AcrySof SN60AT and SN60WF) n = 157, 3) hydrophilic acrylic 1-piece IOLs (Akreos Adapt and Akreos MI60) n = 14.
Figure 2Growth of human lens epithelium cells from capsulorhexis specimens in culture. The lens explants were stained with carboxy-fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFDA SE) after one (A) and two weeks (B) of cell culture and photographed with a confocal microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE300 C1), excitation wavelength 492 nm, emission wavelength 517 nm. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 3Growth of human lens epithelium cells in vitro in relation to Nd:YAG-treatment. Box-plot showing the growth of lens epithelial cells in vitro as % of increase in cell area. Median (bar), interquartile range (boxes) and 95% confidence interval (error bars) as well as outliers are shown. No significant differences between in vitro cell growth of lens cells derived from patients later treated with (n = 23) or not treated with Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy (n = 162) was seen (p = 0.24, Mann–Whitney U test).