BACKGROUND: Frequent exposure of Grenadian dogs to Rhipicephalus sanguineus results in Anaplasma platys, and Ehrlichia canis seroreactivity. During elective surgeries, substantial intraoperative hemorrhage occurs in some seroreactive dogs. OBJECTIVES: To assess hemostatic parameters and bleeding tendencies as well as prevalence of PCR positivity in apparently healthy A. platys and E. canis seroreactive and seronegative free-roaming dogs from Grenada. ANIMALS: Forty-seven elective surgery dogs allocated to 4 groups: Seronegative control (n = 12), A. platys (n = 10), E. canis (n = 14) and A. platys, and E. canis (n = 11) seroreactive. METHODS: Preoperatively, hemostasis was assessed by platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and buccal mucosal bleeding time. Intra- and postoperative bleeding scores were subjectively assigned. Blood, spleen, bone marrow, and lymph node aspirates were tested by PCR. RESULTS: Bleeding scores in dogs coseroreactive for A. platys and E. canis were higher (P = .015) than those of seronegative dogs. A. platys DNA was amplified from 7/21 (33%) A. platys seroreactive dogs and from 1 E. canis seroreactive dog; E. canis DNA was amplified from 21/25 (84%) E. canis seroreactive dogs. E. canis DNA was amplified most often from blood, whereas A. platys DNA was amplified most often from bone marrow. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Apparently healthy, free-roaming dogs coseropositive for A. platys and E. canis may have increased intraoperative bleeding tendencies despite normal hemostatic parameters. Future investigations should explore the potential for vascular injury as a cause for bleeding in these dogs. Improved tick control is needed for dogs in Grenada.
BACKGROUND: Frequent exposure of Grenadian dogs to Rhipicephalus sanguineus results in Anaplasma platys, and Ehrlichia canis seroreactivity. During elective surgeries, substantial intraoperative hemorrhage occurs in some seroreactive dogs. OBJECTIVES: To assess hemostatic parameters and bleeding tendencies as well as prevalence of PCR positivity in apparently healthy A. platys and E. canis seroreactive and seronegative free-roaming dogs from Grenada. ANIMALS: Forty-seven elective surgery dogs allocated to 4 groups: Seronegative control (n = 12), A. platys (n = 10), E. canis (n = 14) and A. platys, and E. canis (n = 11) seroreactive. METHODS: Preoperatively, hemostasis was assessed by platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and buccal mucosal bleeding time. Intra- and postoperative bleeding scores were subjectively assigned. Blood, spleen, bone marrow, and lymph node aspirates were tested by PCR. RESULTS:Bleeding scores in dogs coseroreactive for A. platys and E. canis were higher (P = .015) than those of seronegative dogs. A. platys DNA was amplified from 7/21 (33%) A. platys seroreactive dogs and from 1 E. canis seroreactive dog; E. canis DNA was amplified from 21/25 (84%) E. canis seroreactive dogs. E. canis DNA was amplified most often from blood, whereas A. platys DNA was amplified most often from bone marrow. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Apparently healthy, free-roaming dogs coseropositive for A. platys and E. canis may have increased intraoperative bleeding tendencies despite normal hemostatic parameters. Future investigations should explore the potential for vascular injury as a cause for bleeding in these dogs. Improved tick control is needed for dogs in Grenada.
Authors: Amanda D Loftis; Patrick J Kelly; Mark D Freeman; Susan Fitzharris; Janet Beeler-Marfisi; Chengming Wang Journal: Vet Parasitol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 2.738
Authors: S M Eddlestone; P P V P Diniz; T M Neer; S D Gaunt; R Corstvet; D Cho; G Hosgood; B Hegarty; E B Breitschwerdt Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Márcio Botelho de Castro; Rosangela Zacarias Machado; Lucia Padilha Cury Tomaz de Aquino; Antonio Carlos Alessi; Mirela Tinucci Costa Journal: Vet Parasitol Date: 2004-01-05 Impact factor: 2.738
Authors: Patrick J Kelly; Chuanling Xu; Helene Lucas; Amanda Loftis; Jamie Abete; Frank Zeoli; Audrey Stevens; Kirsten Jaegersen; Kate Ackerson; April Gessner; Bernhard Kaltenboeck; Chengming Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Patrick John Kelly; Liza Köster; Jing Li; Jilei Zhang; Ke Huang; Gillian Carmichael Branford; Silvia Marchi; Michel Vandenplas; Chengming Wang Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Amanda J Shapiro; Graeme Brown; Jacqueline M Norris; Katrina L Bosward; Debbie J Marriot; Nandhakumar Balakrishnan; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Richard Malik Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Bhumika Sharma; Roman R Ganta; Diana Stone; Andy Alhassan; Marta Lanza-Perea; Vanessa Matthew Belmar; Inga Karasek; Elizabeth Cooksey; Catherine M Butler; Kathryn Gibson; Melinda J Wilkerson Journal: Pathogens Date: 2021-02-10
Authors: Carlos A Rodríguez-Alarcón; Diana M Beristain-Ruiz; Angélica Olivares-Muñoz; Andrés Quezada-Casasola; Federico Pérez-Casio; Jesús A Álvarez-Martínez; Jane Tapia-Alanís; José J Lira-Amaya; Ramón Rivera-Barreno; Orlando S Cera-Hurtado; José A Ibancovichi-Camarillo; Luis Soon-Gómez; Jaime R Adame-Gallegos; Julio V Figueroa-Millán Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 3.876