Literature DB >> 25273504

Foreign exam management in practice: seamless access to foreign images and results in a regional environment.

Jason Nagels1, David MacDonald, David Parker.   

Abstract

A challenge for many clinical users is that a patient may receive a diagnostic imaging (DI) service at a number of hospitals or private imaging clinics. The DI services that patients receive at other locations could be clinically relevant to current treatments, but typically, there is no seamless method for a clinical user to access longitudinal DI results for their patient. Radiologists, and other specialists that are intensive users of image data, require seamless ingestion of foreign exams into the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) to achieve full clinical value. Most commonly, a clinical user will depend on the patient to bring in a CD that contains imaging from another location. However, a number of issues can arise when using this type of solution. Firstly, a CD will not provide the clinical user with the full longitudinal record of the patient. Secondly, a CD often will not contain the report associated with the images. Finally, a CD is not seamless, due to the need to manually import the contents of the CD into the local PACS. In order to overcome these limitations, and provide clinical users with a greater benefit related to a patient's longitudinal DI history, the implementation of foreign exam management (FEM) at the local site level is required. This paper presents the experiences of FEM in practice. By leveraging industry standards and edge devices to support FEM, multiple sites with disparate PACS and radiology information system (RIS) vendors are able to seamlessly ingest foreign exams within their local PACS as if they are local exams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25273504      PMCID: PMC4359200          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9735-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  3 in total

1.  Deterministic vs. Probabilistic: Best Practices for Patient Matching Based on a Comparison of Two Implementations.

Authors:  Jason Nagels; Sida Wu; Valentina Gorokhova
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Measuring the Benefits of a Regional Imaging Environment.

Authors:  Jason Nagels; David Macdonald; Christine Coz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Image Exchange in Canada: Examples from the Province of Ontario.

Authors:  Jason Nagels; Sida Wu; Dale Anderson; Kate Black; Vidas Nikolajevas; David Koff
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.