Literature DB >> 25273503

CSI 2.0: a significantly improved version of the Chemical Shift Index.

Noor E Hafsa1, David S Wishart.   

Abstract

Protein chemical shifts have long been used by NMR spectroscopists to assist with secondary structure assignment and to provide useful distance and torsion angle constraint data for structure determination. One of the most widely used methods for secondary structure identification is called the Chemical Shift Index (CSI). The CSI method uses a simple digital chemical shift filter to locate secondary structures along the protein chain using backbone (13)C and (1)H chemical shifts. While the CSI method is simple to use and easy to implement, it is only about 75-80% accurate. Here we describe a significantly improved version of the CSI (2.0) that uses machine-learning techniques to combine all six backbone chemical shifts ((13)Cα, (13)Cβ, (13)C, (15)N, (1)HN, (1)Hα) with sequence-derived features to perform far more accurate secondary structure identification. Our tests indicate that CSI 2.0 achieved an average identification accuracy (Q3) of 90.56% for a training set of 181 proteins in a repeated tenfold cross-validation and 89.35% for a test set of 59 proteins. This represents a significant improvement over other state-of-the-art chemical shift-based methods. In particular, the level of performance of CSI 2.0 is equal to that of standard methods, such as DSSP and STRIDE, used to identify secondary structures via 3D coordinate data. This suggests that CSI 2.0 could be used both in providing accurate NMR constraint data in the early stages of protein structure determination as well as in defining secondary structure locations in the final protein model(s). A CSI 2.0 web server (http://csi.wishartlab.com) is available for submitting the input queries for secondary structure identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25273503     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-014-9863-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  58 in total

1.  Successful recognition of protein folds using threading methods biased by sequence similarity and predicted secondary structure.

Authors:  D T Jones; M Tress; K Bryson; C Hadley
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Investigation of the neighboring residue effects on protein chemical shifts.

Authors:  Yunjun Wang; Oleg Jardetzky
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  VADAR: a web server for quantitative evaluation of protein structure quality.

Authors:  Leigh Willard; Anuj Ranjan; Haiyan Zhang; Hassan Monzavi; Robert F Boyko; Brian D Sykes; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Assessing secondary structure assignment of protein structures by using pairwise sequence-alignment benchmarks.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; A Keith Dunker; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-04

6.  De novo structure generation using chemical shifts for proteins with high-sequence identity but different folds.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Philip N Bryan; Yanan He; John Orban; David Baker; Ad Bax
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Nearest-neighbor effects on backbone alpha and beta carbon chemical shifts in proteins.

Authors:  Liya Wang; Hamid R Eghbalnia; John L Markley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.

Authors:  Fabian Sievers; Andreas Wilm; David Dineen; Toby J Gibson; Kevin Karplus; Weizhong Li; Rodrigo Lopez; Hamish McWilliam; Michael Remmert; Johannes Söding; Julie D Thompson; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  2DCSi: identification of protein secondary structure and redox state using 2D cluster analysis of NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Ching-Cheng Wang; Jui-Hung Chen; Wen-Chung Lai; Woei-Jer Chuang
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  CS23D: a web server for rapid protein structure generation using NMR chemical shifts and sequence data.

Authors:  David S Wishart; David Arndt; Mark Berjanskii; Peter Tang; Jianjun Zhou; Guohui Lin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  22 in total

1.  Application of data mining tools for classification of protein structural class from residue based averaged NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Arun V Kumar; Rehana F M Ali; Yu Cao; V V Krishnan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-03-07

2.  Rapid and reliable protein structure determination via chemical shift threading.

Authors:  Noor E Hafsa; Mark V Berjanskii; David Arndt; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Identification of heteromolecular binding sites in transcription factors Sp1 and TAF4 using high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Emi Hibino; Rintaro Inoue; Masaaki Sugiyama; Jun Kuwahara; Katsumi Matsuzaki; Masaru Hoshino
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  FBP21's C-Terminal Domain Remains Dynamic When Wrapped around the c-Sec63 Unit of Brr2 Helicase.

Authors:  Jana Sticht; Miriam Bertazzon; Lisa M Henning; Jan R Licha; Esam T Abualrous; Christian Freund
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Structured and disordered regions cooperatively mediate DNA-binding autoinhibition of ETS factors ETV1, ETV4 and ETV5.

Authors:  Simon L Currie; Desmond K W Lau; Jedediah J Doane; Frank G Whitby; Mark Okon; Lawrence P McIntosh; Barbara J Graves
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Hairpin RNA-induced conformational change of a eukaryotic-specific lysyl-tRNA synthetase extension and role of adjacent anticodon-binding domain.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Maryanne Refaei; Shuohui Liu; Aaron Decker; Jennifer M Hinerman; Andrew B Herr; Mike Howell; Karin Musier-Forsyth; Pearl Tsang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Predicting the redox state and secondary structure of cysteine residues using multi-dimensional classification analysis of NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Ching-Cheng Wang; Wen-Chung Lai; Woei-Jer Chuang
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  The solution structure of monomeric CCL5 in complex with a doubly sulfated N-terminal segment of CCR5.

Authors:  Meital Abayev; João P G L M Rodrigues; Gautam Srivastava; Boris Arshava; Łukasz Jaremko; Mariusz Jaremko; Fred Naider; Michael Levitt; Jacob Anglister
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.542

9.  The BECN1 N-terminal domain is intrinsically disordered.

Authors:  Erinna F Lee; Matthew A Perugini; Anne Pettikiriarachchi; Marco Evangelista; David W Keizer; Shenggen Yao; W Douglas Fairlie
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 16.016

10.  Biliverdin Reductase B Dynamics Are Coupled to Coenzyme Binding.

Authors:  Natasia Paukovich; Mengjun Xue; James R Elder; Jasmina S Redzic; Ashley Blue; Hamish Pike; Brian G Miller; Todd M Pitts; David D Pollock; Kirk Hansen; Angelo D'Alessandro; Elan Zohar Eisenmesser
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.