Literature DB >> 25273480

Faecal microbiota transplantation: from practice to legislation before considering industrialization.

J-C Lagier1.   

Abstract

Recurrent Clostridium difficile infections constitute an important medical concern. Evidence has been provided showing that faecal microbiota transplantation is a more efficient treatment than antibiotics. Serious side effects are unusual, and acceptability is not an obstacle. Nevertheless, protocols are heterogeneous with respect to the selection of donors and the methodology used for the faecal transplantation. Regulations by both the Food and Drug Administration and the French authorities consider stool samples to be drugs, and suggest strict supervision in clinical trials. Donor screening by questionnaire or by blood and stool analysis, which is essential in eliminating pathogens or viruses before transplantation, is similar in different countries, with a few exceptions. The traceability of the faecal transplant and long-term follow-up of the patients in clinical trials are issues that may be difficult to organize. The use of frozen microbiota facilitates transplantation, and the nasogastric route seems to be at least as effective as other invasive methods and avoids the risk of anaesthesia. Synthetic microbiota is an approach that selects a mixture of bacteria, thereby eliminating the risk of transmissible disease; however, this approach is not yet evidence-based. The use of pills, which is currently being tested in clinical trials, will certainly be the starting point for the extensive use and wide industrialization of faecal microbiota transplantation.
© 2014 The Author Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2014 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; faecal microbiota transplant; industrialization; pills; regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25273480     DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  7 in total

1.  Establishing a donor stool bank for faecal microbiota transplantation: methods and feasibility.

Authors:  Anne A Rode; Peter Bytzer; Ole Birger Pedersen; Jørgen Engberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  To flush or not to flush … that is a question.

Authors:  Bernard Perbal
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.782

3.  Dramatic reduction in Clostridium difficile ribotype 027-associated mortality with early fecal transplantation by the nasogastric route: a preliminary report.

Authors:  J-C Lagier; M Delord; M Million; P Parola; A Stein; P Brouqui; D Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Control of Clostridium difficile Infection by Defined Microbial Communities.

Authors:  James Collins; Jennifer M Auchtung
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-09

Review 5.  Faecal microbiota transplantation: a regulatory hurdle?

Authors:  Frederick Verbeke; Yorick Janssens; Evelien Wynendaele; Bart De Spiegeleer
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Fecal microbiota transplantation: current clinical efficacy and future prospects.

Authors:  Kathryn A Bowman; Elizabeth K Broussard; Christina M Surawicz
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-23

Review 7.  Comparison of Different Strategies for Providing Fecal Microbiota Transplantation to Treat Patients with Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in Two English Hospitals: A Review.

Authors:  Simon D Goldenberg; Rahul Batra; Ian Beales; Jonathan Leith Digby-Bell; Peter Miles Irving; Lee Kellingray; Arjan Narbad; Ngozi Franslem-Elumogo
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2018-02-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.