Gunter von Minckwitz1, Fabio Puglisi2, Javier Cortes3, Eduard Vrdoljak4, Norbert Marschner5, Christoph Zielinski6, Cristian Villanueva7, Gilles Romieu8, István Lang9, Eva Ciruelos10, Michele De Laurentiis11, Corinne Veyret12, Sabine de Ducla13, Ulrich Freudensprung13, Stefanie Srock13, Joseph Gligorov14. 1. German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, and University Women's Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: Gunter.vonMinckwitz@germanbreastgroup.de. 2. University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy. 3. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Center of Oncology, University Hospital Split, Split, Croatia. 5. Outpatient Cancer Center, Freiburg, Germany. 6. Department of Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Central European Cooperative Oncology Group, Vienna, Austria. 7. Centre Hospitalier-Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France. 8. Institut du Cancer Montpellier, Val d'Aurelle, France. 9. National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary. 10. Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain. 11. Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy. 12. Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France. 13. F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland. 14. Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris-Tenon, Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Combining bevacizumab with first-line or second-line chemotherapy improves progression-free survival in HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. We assessed the efficacy and safety of further bevacizumab therapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had progressed after treatment withbevacizumab plus chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients who had HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after receiving 12 weeks or more of first-linebevacizumab plus chemotherapyfrom 118 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a central interactive voice response system using a block randomisation schedule (block size four) stratified by hormone receptor status, first-line progression-free survival, selected chemotherapy, and lactate dehydrogenase concentration, to receive second-line single-agent chemotherapy either alone or with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Second-line therapy was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. At progression, patients randomly assigned to chemotherapy alone received third-line chemotherapy without bevacizumab; those randomly assigned to bevacizumab continued bevacizumab with third-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from randomisation to second-line progression or death in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01250379. FINDINGS:Between Feb 17, 2011, and April 3, 2013, 494 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (247 in each group). The median duration of follow-up at the time of this prespecified primary progression-free survival analysis was 15·9 months (IQR 9·1-21·7) in the chemotherapy-alone group and 16·1 months (10·6-22·7) in the combination group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer for those patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy than for those with chemotherapy alone (median: 6·3 months [95% CI 5·4-7·2] vs 4·2 months [3·9-4·7], respectively, stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·75 [95% CI 0·61-0·93], two-sided stratified log-rank p=0·0068). The most common grade 3 or more adverse events were hypertension (33 [13%] of 245 patients receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs 17 [7%] of 238 patients receiving chemotherapy alone), neutropenia (29 [12%] vs 20 [8%]), and hand-foot syndrome (27 [11%] vs 25 [11%]). Grade 3 proteinuria occurred in 17 (7%) of 245 patients receiving combination therapy and one (<1%) of 238 patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Serious adverse events were reported in 61 (25%) of 245 patients receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus 44 (18%) of 238 patients receiving chemotherapy alone. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that continued VEGF inhibition with further bevacizumab is a valid treatment option for patients with locally recurrent or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease was stabilised or responded to first-linebevacizumab with chemotherapy. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Combining bevacizumab with first-line or second-line chemotherapy improves progression-free survival in HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. We assessed the efficacy and safety of further bevacizumab therapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had progressed after treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients who had HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after receiving 12 weeks or more of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy from 118 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a central interactive voice response system using a block randomisation schedule (block size four) stratified by hormone receptor status, first-line progression-free survival, selected chemotherapy, and lactate dehydrogenase concentration, to receive second-line single-agent chemotherapy either alone or with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Second-line therapy was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. At progression, patients randomly assigned to chemotherapy alone received third-line chemotherapy without bevacizumab; those randomly assigned to bevacizumab continued bevacizumab with third-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from randomisation to second-line progression or death in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01250379. FINDINGS: Between Feb 17, 2011, and April 3, 2013, 494 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (247 in each group). The median duration of follow-up at the time of this prespecified primary progression-free survival analysis was 15·9 months (IQR 9·1-21·7) in the chemotherapy-alone group and 16·1 months (10·6-22·7) in the combination group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer for those patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy than for those with chemotherapy alone (median: 6·3 months [95% CI 5·4-7·2] vs 4·2 months [3·9-4·7], respectively, stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·75 [95% CI 0·61-0·93], two-sided stratified log-rank p=0·0068). The most common grade 3 or more adverse events were hypertension (33 [13%] of 245 patients receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs 17 [7%] of 238 patients receiving chemotherapy alone), neutropenia (29 [12%] vs 20 [8%]), and hand-foot syndrome (27 [11%] vs 25 [11%]). Grade 3 proteinuria occurred in 17 (7%) of 245 patients receiving combination therapy and one (<1%) of 238 patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Serious adverse events were reported in 61 (25%) of 245 patients receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus 44 (18%) of 238 patients receiving chemotherapy alone. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that continued VEGF inhibition with further bevacizumab is a valid treatment option for patients with locally recurrent or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease was stabilised or responded to first-line bevacizumab with chemotherapy. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Authors: Rajesh Ramanathan; Amy L Olex; Mikhail Dozmorov; Harry D Bear; Leopoldo Jose Fernandez; Kazuaki Takabe Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Tiffany A Traina; Kathy Miller; Denise A Yardley; Janice Eakle; Lee S Schwartzberg; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; William Gradishar; Peter Schmid; Eric Winer; Catherine Kelly; Rita Nanda; Ayca Gucalp; Ahmad Awada; Laura Garcia-Estevez; Maureen E Trudeau; Joyce Steinberg; Hirdesh Uppal; Iulia Cristina Tudor; Amy Peterson; Javier Cortes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Monika Haemmerle; Justin Bottsford-Miller; Sunila Pradeep; Morgan L Taylor; Hyun-Jin Choi; Jean M Hansen; Heather J Dalton; Rebecca L Stone; Min Soon Cho; Alpa M Nick; Archana S Nagaraja; Tony Gutschner; Kshipra M Gharpure; Lingegowda S Mangala; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Hee Dong Han; Behrouz Zand; Guillermo N Armaiz-Pena; Sherry Y Wu; Chad V Pecot; Alan R Burns; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Vahid Afshar-Kharghan; Anil K Sood Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 14.808