Ji Won Kim1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by heterogeneous pathogenesis and many IBSpatients suffer from visceral hypersensitivity. Visceral hypersensitivity is evaluated under stimulated condition with mechanical distension using barostat to provide sensations of discomfort or visceral pain in most clinical researches. Distensions administered to rectum using the barostat, can induce visceral discomfort or pain, which are like typical symptoms for IBS. In addition, increased rectal sensitivity has found to be related to symptom severity in daily life. It is known that visceral hypersensitivity was associated with increased intestinal permeability and inflammation. Increased intestinal permeability leads to translocation of bacteria and their products, resulting to induce hypersensitivity by targeting the enteric neurons. Increased release of immunologic mediators resulted in visceral hypersensitivity via sensitization of neuronal cells.Previous studies with probiotic therapeutic effects have focus on daily symptoms in IBSpatients, and the effects were a small but significant improvement in overall symptom score. However, in previous studies, heterogeneous groups of IBSpatients have been included rather than a selection of IBSpatients based on pathophysiological characteristics. None of the studies up to now has chosen an approach by evaluating effects of probiotics targeting on one common pathophysiological mechanism. In this study, Ludidi et al1 investigated that whether implementing probiotics in IBSpatients with documented visceral hypersensitivity had potential effect to reduce visceral hypersensitivity (primary end point).This study was performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in 40 Rome III IBSpatients with visceral hypersensitivity. Prior to participation, patients kept a 2-weak symptom diary and underwent barostat measurement. When visceral hypersensitivity was confirmed, patients were enrolled this study and received a multispecies probiotics (6 different probiotic strains 109 CFU/g), or a placebo products of one sachet (5 g) per day for 6 weeks. At the end of the intervention period, visceroperception and symptoms were reevaluated.In total, 35 patients were completed the study (19 in probiotics and 16 in placebo groups). At baseline, all included patients showed visceral hypersensitivity, but the percentage of hypersensitivepatients decreased significantly within both the probiotics and placebo groups after 6 weeks of intervention (toward 76.5% and 71.4%, respectively; both P < 0.05 vs. baseline). However, response rates did not differ between the probiotic and placebo groups (P = 0.24). In addition, median thresholds for pain, urge and discomfort did not differ significantly before vs. after intervention within the probiotic nor the placebo group. The difference in first sensation to rectal distension was not significant between probiotic vs. placebo group (0.00 [−0.17 to 15.00] vs. 0.00 [−17.00 to 23.00]; P = 0. 78).Mean symptom improvement was not significantly different between probiotic vs. placebo group (19% vs. 39%, P = 0.18), but interestingly there were gender-related response differences in the placebo group. In placebo group, bloating, abdominal cramping and symptom-free days only improved in the female patients, but not in the male patients. However, this gender-difference was not observed in the probiotic group.The authors concluded that in targeted subgroups of IBSpatients with a common pathophysiological characteristics (documented visceral hypersensitivity), no significant effect of a multi-species probiotic on visceroperception was observed.
Comments
IBS is a functional bowel disorder characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort relieved by defecation, and accompanied by changes in bowel habits such as diarrhea or constipation, which cannot be explained by structural, biochemical or metabolic abnormalities. The pathophysiology of IBS is known to associated with visceral hypersensitivity, altered intestinal permeability, genetic or environmental factors, psychological factors or a dysregulatd barin-gut axis.2Visceral hypersensitivity is known to play an important role for IBS symptom, but others insist that increased sensitivity is merely a reflection of psychological factors such as anxiety or depression. Visceral hypersensitivity seemed to be important marker for differentiating IBS from functional abdominal pain syndrome (FAPS), showing hyposensitivity to physiologic distention, although IBS and FAPS had common clinical features.3Posserud et al4 investigated the association between rectal perception and gastrointestinal (GI) and psychological symptoms in 109 IBSpatients, and they showed that altered rectal perception was common in patients with IBS and was asscociated with GI symptom severity, especially abdominal pain and bloating. In IBSpatients, rectal compliance and threshold for pain was decreased, and hypersensitivity to rectal balloon distension occurred in 33% and was associated with increased symptom severity.5The therapeutic mechanisms of probiotics include effects on regulation of intestinal microbial homeostasis, interference with the ability of pathogens to colonize and infect the mucosa, modulation of local and systematic immune response, and stabilization or maintenance of the GI barrier function.6 Previous researches assessing the effects of probiotics on IBS symptoms have revealed conflicting data. In recent studies, it was shown that 4-week treatment with probiotics improved IBS symptoms and altered composition of the microbiota, and that probiotic treatment in IBSpatients reduced the genus Bacteroids to the levels of healthy controls and also improved IBS symptoms.7,8 However, in other study Lactobacillus plantarum MF1298 species had aggravated IBS symptom score, and this means not all strains with in vitro demonstrated probiotics actually showed therapeutic effects on the in vivo condition.9To date, clinical research with probiotics in IBSpatients suffered from methodological limitations such as differences in study design, type of probiotics administered, and outcome parameters. Furthermore, previous studies frequently used subject endpoints and included heterogeneous patient populations.10 In contrasts, the most strength of this study was that the authors evaluated objective primary endpoints, which was the assessment the effect of probiotics on visceral hypersensitivity measured by rectal barostat examination. Furthermore, relatively homogenous IBSpatients were specifically selected for this study based on the presence of rectal hypersensitivity using rectal barostat results.1 Interestingly in this study, the authors observed symptoms of flatulence, bloating and abdominal cramping improved in placebo group, but not in probiotic group, and they assumed that the presence of some strains in the probiotic mixture may have contributed to an increased gas production and thereby to an increase in gas-related symptoms.There were several limitations in this study. First the duration of probiotic supplementation period was 6 weeks. As IBS is a chronic condition, it may require longer duration to result in significant effects at symptom level. Secondly, a mixture of 6 different bacterial strains used in this study, and the bacterial competitive interaction might occur resulting in negative effect on outcome. Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM was used based on its antinociceptive properties, and Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus casei were selected by their in vivo potential to improve epithelial integrity and inflammatory status.11 Thirdly, in contrast to conventional chemistry-based drugs which act after absorption in the small bowel, probiotics need to reach a subject’s intestine alive to show the effect. Therefore, it is important to confirm alive multispecies probiotics in the feces of patients.In conclusion, the multispecies probiotics has no effect on visceroperception in IBSpatients with visceral hypersensitivity in placebo-controlled study, there are possibility of other mechanism of multispecies probiotics may contribute to the relieving IBS symptoms. Further researches should be performed to identify which strains of probiotics provide the optimal therapeutic effect to individual patients with IBS and which specific symptoms of IBS should be the aims of probiotic treatment.
Authors: Siew Chien Ng; Emma F C Lam; Tommy T Y Lam; Yawen Chan; Wendy Law; Pete C H Tse; Michael A Kamm; Joseph J Y Sung; Francis K L Chan; Justin C Y Wu Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Jun Sik Yoon; Won Sohn; Oh Young Lee; Sang Pyo Lee; Kang Nyeong Lee; Dae Won Jun; Hang Lak Lee; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi; Won-Seok Chung; Jae-Gu Seo Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: S Ludidi; D M Jonkers; C J Koning; J W Kruimel; L Mulder; I B van der Vaart; J M Conchillo; A A M Masclee Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Harro M Timmerman; Laetitia E M Niers; Ben U Ridwan; Catherina J M Koning; Linda Mulder; Louis M A Akkermans; Frans M Rombouts; Ger T Rijkers Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 7.324