Literature DB >> 25273103

The RNA shapes studio.

Stefan Janssen1, Robert Giegerich1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Abstract shape analysis, first proposed in 2004, allows one to extract several relevant structures from the folding space of an RNA sequence, preferable to focusing in a single structure of minimal free energy. We report recent extensions to this approach.
RESULTS: We have rebuilt the original RNAshapes as a repository of components that allows us to integrate several established tools for RNA structure analysis: RNAshapes, RNAalishapes and pknotsRG, including its recent extension pKiss. As a spin-off, we obtain heretofore unavailable functionality: e. g. with pKiss, we can now perform abstract shape analysis for structures holding pseudoknots up to the complexity of kissing hairpin motifs. The new tool pAliKiss can predict kissing hairpin motifs from aligned sequences. Along with the integration, the functionality of the tools was also extended in manifold ways.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: As before, the tool is available on the Bielefeld Bioinformatics server at http://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnashapesstudio. CONTACT: bibi-help@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25273103      PMCID: PMC4308662          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 THE RNA SHAPES STUDIO

1.1 Integration of tools for RNA abstract shape analysis

The framework of algebraic dynamic programming (ADP) allows us to express dynamic programming algorithms for sequence analysis on a high level of abstraction. They are composed from signatures, tree grammars and evaluation algebras ( Giegerich ). Powerful product operations on algebras allow one to derive new types of analysis by the combination of available components, essentially with a single keystroke ( Steffen and Giegerich, 2005 ). Relying on the recent B ellman’s GAP system ( Sauthoff ), which implements the ADP framework, we have built a repository of components that allows us to integrate several established tools for RNA structure analysis: RNA shapes , RNA alishapes and pknots RG, including its recent extension p K iss . As a spin-off, we obtain heretofore unavailable functionality: e. g. with p K iss , we can now perform abstract shape analysis for structures holding pseudoknots up to the complexity of kissing hairpin motifs. The new tool p A li K iss can predict kissing hairpin motifs from aligned sequences. Along with the integration, the functionality of the tools was also extended in manifold ways. Figure 1 gives an overview.
Fig. 1.

Parameters for the RNA shapes studio. New features are indicated by + . New parameters are highlighted in yellow. New analysis modes are shaded in green

Parameters for the RNA shapes studio. New features are indicated by + . New parameters are highlighted in yellow. New analysis modes are shaded in green

1.2 Integrated tools and their new functionality

1.2.1 Extensions to RNA shapes

It is generally agreed that predicting a single structure of minimal free energy does not adequately capture the subtlety and versatility of RNA structure formation. The RNA shapes tool introduced the notion of abstract shapes ( Giegerich ; Voß )—a (mathematically precise) characterization of structures by their arrangement of helices. For example, ‘[[][][]]’ indicates a cloverleaf shape, and ‘[_[_[]_]]’ a single stem-loop with a 5′ bulge and an internal loop. Classical abstract shape analysis reports minimum free energy structures from different shape classes, or Boltzmann structure probabilities accumulated by shape. This gives synoptic information about the folding space of a given RNA sequence, without heuristics or sampling. Extending RNA shapes , we added different modes of treating dangling bases (consistent with RNA fold options −d0, −d1 and −d2 ) ( Janssen ; Lorenz ), computation of base pair probabilities and maximum expected accuracy (MEA) folding ( Lu ).

1.2.2 Extensions to RNA alishapes

The work of Voß (2006) combines the ideas of RNA alifold and RNA shapes and performs shape analysis based on pre-aligned RNA sequences. We added the computation of a structure conservation index, different dangling base models, MEA folding and a window mode. RIBOSUM scoring ( Bernhart ) was added for evaluating sequence similarity.

1.2.3 Extensions to p K iss

In Theis the ideas of pknots RG ( Reeder and Giegerich, 2004 ) are extended to predict (aside from unknotted structures and H-type pseudoknots) RNA structures that exhibit kissing hairpin motifs in an arbitrarily nested fashion, requiring time and space. We added shape analysis, probabilities, different folding strategies and different dangling base models. The -cast option provides comparative prediction of pseudoknotted structures as in the RNA cast approach ( Reeder and Giegerich, 2005 ). A window mode was also included.

1.2.4 New tool p A li K iss

The program p A li K iss allows to predict pseudoknots, including kissing hairpins from aligned sequences. Being composed from the grammars and algebras of the other tools, it inherits all the features and options that make sense for it.

1.2.5 Utilities

All tools were augmented with utilities to compute folding energy or abstract shape for sequences that are provided with a structure from an outside source, in a way consistent with the tools’ energy model. The graphical motif description tool L ocomotif ( Reeder ) now uses modules from the RNA shapes studio. The K not I n F rame ( Theis ) tool that predicts −1 ribosomal frameshifts has been updated as well.

2 APPLICATION CASE: A FRAMESHIFT STIMULATION ELEMENT IN MERS

The Corona virus family contains a frameshift stimulation element ( Baranov ), where the frameshift is facilitated by a slippery site together with either an H-type or a K-type pseudoknot. R fam ( Burge ) holds the corresponding family model RF00507, although the tools of R fam cannot explicitly model pseudoknots. p K iss ( Theis ) in -enforce mode reveals that for 11 family members, minimal free energy structures are H-types, another 11 are K-type pseudoknots and for only one member a purely nested structure has the best energy. The recently sequenced MERS genome (KF958702.1) is annotated with a homologous frameshift site, whereas the structure of the triggering element remains unclear. Structure prediction with p K iss for a 100 bp stretch downstream the slippery site attests a most stable K-type pseudoknot (see Fig. 2 ). A second run of p K iss , this time in probability mode, shows that the shape class of this particular K-type pseudoknot has an overwhelming Boltzmann probability of ; leaving not much probability mass for any other shape classes.
Fig. 2.

RNA shapes studio result page for folding the MERS example with p K iss . Illustration by VARNA ( Darty )

RNA shapes studio result page for folding the MERS example with p K iss . Illustration by VARNA ( Darty )

3 AVAILABILITY

The RNA shapes studio is available at http://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnashapesstudio . Users can access the B ellman’s GAP source code of all components in the repository, and combine or extend them according to their own goals. This has been done, for example, in Reinkensmeier for defining the CCUCCUCC -motif family in the Rhizobiales . Conflict of interest : none declared.
  17 in total

1.  Abstract shapes of RNA.

Authors:  Robert Giegerich; Björn Voss; Marc Rehmsmeier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Locomotif: from graphical motif description to RNA motif search.

Authors:  Janina Reeder; Jens Reeder; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Lost in folding space? Comparing four variants of the thermodynamic model for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Christian Schudoma; Gerhard Steger; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  ViennaRNA Package 2.0.

Authors:  Ronny Lorenz; Stephan H Bernhart; Christian Höner Zu Siederdissen; Hakim Tafer; Christoph Flamm; Peter F Stadler; Ivo L Hofacker
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.405

5.  Versatile and declarative dynamic programming using pair algebras.

Authors:  Peter Steffen; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Structural analysis of aligned RNAs.

Authors:  Björn Voss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Programmed ribosomal frameshifting in decoding the SARS-CoV genome.

Authors:  Pavel V Baranov; Clark M Henderson; Christine B Anderson; Raymond F Gesteland; John F Atkins; Michael T Howard
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  KnotInFrame: prediction of -1 ribosomal frameshift events.

Authors:  Corinna Theis; Jens Reeder; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  RNAalifold: improved consensus structure prediction for RNA alignments.

Authors:  Stephan H Bernhart; Ivo L Hofacker; Sebastian Will; Andreas R Gruber; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Design, implementation and evaluation of a practical pseudoknot folding algorithm based on thermodynamics.

Authors:  Jens Reeder; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  47 in total

1.  Widespread distribution and structural diversity of Type IV IRESs in members of Picornaviridae.

Authors:  Mukta Asnani; Parimal Kumar; Christopher U T Hellen
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 2.  Bioinformatic tools for analysis of CLIP ribonucleoprotein data.

Authors:  Supriyo De; Myriam Gorospe
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 9.957

Review 3.  Guidelines for the optimal design of miRNA-based shRNAs.

Authors:  Xavier Bofill-De Ros; Shuo Gu
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  The Halastavi árva Virus Intergenic Region IRES Promotes Translation by the Simplest Possible Initiation Mechanism.

Authors:  Irina S Abaeva; Quentin Vicens; Anthony Bochler; Heddy Soufari; Angelita Simonetti; Tatyana V Pestova; Yaser Hashem; Christopher U T Hellen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Predicting the Structure of a Viroid : Structure, Structure Distribution, Consensus Structure, and Structure Drawing.

Authors:  Gerhard Steger
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  IPANEMAP: integrative probing analysis of nucleic acids empowered by multiple accessibility profiles.

Authors:  Afaf Saaidi; Delphine Allouche; Mireille Regnier; Bruno Sargueil; Yann Ponty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Pepo aphid-borne yellows virus: a new species in the genus Polerovirus.

Authors:  Jacques D Ibaba; Mark D Laing; Augustine Gubba
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.332

8.  Search for 5'-leader regulatory RNA structures based on gene annotation aided by the RiboGap database.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Naghdi; Katia Smail; Joy X Wang; Fallou Wade; Ronald R Breaker; Jonathan Perreault
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Structural Alignment and Covariation Analysis of RNA Sequences.

Authors:  Nicolas J Tourasse; Fabien Darfeuille
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2020-02-05

10.  Comparative Molecular Characterization of Novel and Known Piscine Toti-Like Viruses.

Authors:  Liv Sandlund; Sunil K Mor; Vikash K Singh; Soumesh K Padhi; Nicholas B D Phelps; Stian Nylund; Aase B Mikalsen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.