Literature DB >> 25272283

What are we putting in our ears? A consumer product analysis of aural foreign bodies.

Peter F Svider1, Angela Vong, Anthony Sheyn, Dennis I Bojrab, Robert S Hong, Jean Anderson Eloy, Adam J Folbe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Rapid identification of foreign bodies may be crucial in deciding the appropriate course of action; and knowledge of consumer products that most commonly become aural foreign bodies (AFB) may potentially guide patient education strategies. Our objectives were to estimate the nationwide incidence of emergency department (ED) visits for consumer products presenting as AFBs and describe products encountered, demographic trends, general outcomes, and other reported aspects of injury.
METHODS: The authors searched the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System for AFB ED visits from 2008 to 2012. Consumer product, patient demographics, and outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 9,472 case entries amounting to an estimated 280,939 ED visits for AFBs. Of these, 49.3% of patients were male and 50.7% were female, with 98.2% of all patients being treated/examined and then released. Jewelry was the most common foreign body (39.4%), followed by cotton swabs/first aid equipment, paper products, pens/pencils, and desk supplies. Children between 2 and 8 years of age were most commonly affected, with jewelry as the most common item. Cotton swabs/first aid equipment predominated among adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Aural foreign bodies considerably affect health care expenditures; over 250,000 ED visits over a 5-year span were noted. Age- and gender-specific patterns reported in this analysis can serve as a valuable adjunct for history taking and clinical examination. Jewelry products predominated among children, while cotton swab/first aid products, hearing aids, and other ear-specific accessories significantly affected adults. Although children were most commonly affected, these findings highlight the need for sustained education and prevention strategies among all age groups.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foreign bodies; aural foreign bodies; consumer product safety; national electronic injury surveillance system

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25272283     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Traumatic Facial Injuries Among Elderly Nursing Home Residents: Never Event or Frequent Occurrence?

Authors:  Michael Bobian; Nour El-Kashlan; Curtis J Hanba; Peter F Svider; Adam J Folbe; Jean Anderson Eloy; Giancarlo F Zuliani; Michael Carron
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Will children ever learn? Removal of nasal and aural foreign bodies: a study of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  S Morris; M S Osborne; A L McDermott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Incidental Finding in Pre-Orthodontic Treatment Radiographs of an Aural Foreign Body: A Case Report.

Authors:  Cinzia Maspero; Andrea Abate; Francesco Inchingolo; Claudia Dolci; Maria Grazia Cagetti; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.