Literature DB >> 25272256

Spatial dependence of malaria epidemics in municipalities of the Amazonian Ecosystem.

Rui Moreira Braz1, Renato Fontes Guimarães2, Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior2, Pedro Luiz Tauil3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In 2010, there were 305 (37.8%) municipalities with malaria epidemics in the Brazilian Amazon. The epidemics spread can be explained by the spatial distribution pattern.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the spatial dependence, autocorrelation, of the malaria epidemics in the municipalities of this region.
METHODS: An automated algorithm was used for the detection of epidemic municipalities in 2003, 2007 and 2010. Spatial dependence was analyzed by applying the global and local Moran index on the epidemic months proportion variable. The epidemic municipalities clusters were identified using the TerraView software.
RESULTS: The global Moran index values were 0.4 in 2003; 0.6 in 2007; and 0.5 in 2010 (p = 0.01), confirming the spatial dependence among the epidemic municipalities. Box Map and Moran Map identified inter-municipal, interstate and borders clusters with spatial autocorrelation (p < 0.05). There were 10 epidemic municipalities clusters in 2003; 9 in 2007 and 8 in 2010. DISCUSSION: The epidemic municipalities clusters may be linked to the health facilities difficulties on acting together. The structural limitations of the health services can be overcome by territorial integration to support planning and control activities, strengthening the interventions.
CONCLUSION: The routine analysis of the epidemic municipalities clusters with spatial and temporal persistence may provide a new indicator of planning and integrated control prioritization, contributing to malaria epidemics reducing in inter-municipal, interstate and borders areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25272256     DOI: 10.1590/1809-4503201400030004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Epidemiol        ISSN: 1415-790X


  7 in total

1.  Time trends and changes in the distribution of malaria cases in the Brazilian Amazon Region, 2004-2013.

Authors:  Isac da Sf Lima; Oscar Mm Lapouble; Elisabeth C Duarte
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 2.  Kidney involvement in malaria: an update.

Authors:  Geraldo Bezerra da Silva; José Reginaldo Pinto; Elvino José Guardão Barros; Geysa Maria Nogueira Farias; Elizabeth De Francesco Daher
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.846

3.  Analyzing the Local Epidemiological Profile of Malaria Transmission in the Brazilian Amazon Between 2010 and 2015.

Authors:  Tiago Canelas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Helena Ribeiro
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  Reaching the malaria elimination goal in Brazil: a spatial analysis and time-series study.

Authors:  Gabriel Zorello Laporta; Maria Eugenia Grillet; Sheila Rodrigues Rodovalho; Eduardo Massad; Maria Anice Mureb Sallum
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.520

5.  Malaria at international borders: challenges for elimination on the remote Brazil-Peru border.

Authors:  Monica Palma-Cuero; Myrna Barata Machado; Jucelia Taiz Bruno Graça; Ney Batista Dos Anjos; Rafael Santos Pereira; Martha Cecilia Suárez-Mutis
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.846

6.  Epidemic and Endemic Malaria Transmission Related to Fish Farming Ponds in the Amazon Frontier.

Authors:  Izabel Cristina Dos Reis; Nildimar Alves Honório; Fábio Saito Monteiro de Barros; Christovam Barcellos; Uriel Kitron; Daniel Cardoso Portela Camara; Glaucio Rocha Pereira; Erlei Cassiano Keppeler; Mônica da Silva-Nunes; Cláudia Torres Codeço
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Measuring the contribution of human mobility to malaria persistence.

Authors:  Marcelo F C Gomes; Cláudia T Codeço; Leonardo S Bastos; Raquel M Lana
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.979

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.