Masood Mazaheri1, Elham Heidari, Javid Mostamand, Hossein Negahban, Jaap H van Dieen. 1. *MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Faculty of Human Move-ment Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands †Musculoskeletal Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; and ‡Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, observational study. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pain and fear of pain have competing effects on postural sway in patients with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Competing effects of pain and pain-related fear on postural control can be proposed as the likely explanation for inconsistent results regarding postural sway in the LBP literature. We hypothesized that although pain might increase postural sway, fear of pain might reduce sway through an increased cognitive effort or increased cocontraction to restrict body movement. The cognitive strategy would be less effective under dual-task conditions and the cocontraction strategy was expected to be less effective when standing on a narrow base of support surface. METHODS: Postural sway was measured in combined conditions of base of support (full and narrow) and cognitive loading (single and dual tasks) in 3 experimental groups with current LBP, recent LBP, and no LBP. Sway amplitude, path length, mean power frequency, and sample entropy were extracted from center-of-pressure data. RESULTS: The current-LBP group and recent-LBP group reported significantly different levels of pain, but similar levels of pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. The current-LBP group tended to display larger sway amplitudes in the anteroposterior direction compared with the other 2 groups. Mean power frequency values in mediolateral direction were lower in patients with the current LBP compared with recent LBP. Smaller sample entropy was found in the current-LBP group than the other groups in most experimental conditions, particularly when standing on a narrow base of support. CONCLUSION: Alterations of postural sway are mostly mediated by pain but not pain-related fear. LBP tends to increase sway amplitude, which seems to be counteracted by increased effort invested in postural control leading to decreased frequency and increased regularity of sway particularly under increased task demands. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, observational study. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pain and fear of pain have competing effects on postural sway in patients with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Competing effects of pain and pain-related fear on postural control can be proposed as the likely explanation for inconsistent results regarding postural sway in the LBP literature. We hypothesized that although pain might increase postural sway, fear of pain might reduce sway through an increased cognitive effort or increased cocontraction to restrict body movement. The cognitive strategy would be less effective under dual-task conditions and the cocontraction strategy was expected to be less effective when standing on a narrow base of support surface. METHODS: Postural sway was measured in combined conditions of base of support (full and narrow) and cognitive loading (single and dual tasks) in 3 experimental groups with current LBP, recent LBP, and no LBP. Sway amplitude, path length, mean power frequency, and sample entropy were extracted from center-of-pressure data. RESULTS: The current-LBP group and recent-LBP group reported significantly different levels of pain, but similar levels of pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. The current-LBP group tended to display larger sway amplitudes in the anteroposterior direction compared with the other 2 groups. Mean power frequency values in mediolateral direction were lower in patients with the current LBP compared with recent LBP. Smaller sample entropy was found in the current-LBP group than the other groups in most experimental conditions, particularly when standing on a narrow base of support. CONCLUSION: Alterations of postural sway are mostly mediated by pain but not pain-related fear. LBP tends to increase sway amplitude, which seems to be counteracted by increased effort invested in postural control leading to decreased frequency and increased regularity of sway particularly under increased task demands. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study.
Authors: Kevin Rose-Dulcina; Nicolas Vuillerme; Anne Tabard-Fougère; Romain Dayer; Dennis E Dominguez; Stephane Armand; Stéphane Genevay Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-04-23