Maria João Mota1, Mirtha Cardoso2, Andreia Carvalho3, Alda Marques4, Pedro Sá-Couto5, Sara Demain6. 1. Association of Parents and Friends of the Person with Mental Disability, Rua Padre Luís Pereira, Portugal. 2. São Bernardo Clinic, Aveiro, Portugal. 3. School of Health Technologies of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 4. School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. 5. Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications, Mathematics Department, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. 6. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the self-reported prevalence and impact of low back pain (LBP) during pregnancy in primiparous and multiparous women, and their treatment-seeking rationales and experiences, including their use of physiotherapy. METHODS: A sample of 105 post-partum women was recruited. All participants answered a questionnaire; women who experienced LBP during pregnancy (n=71) continue in the study and later they were also interviewed. Content analysis, descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Reports of LBP were common (n=71; 67.6%) and slightly more frequent in primiparous (n=40; 56.3%) than multiparous (n=31; 43.7%) women. Multiparous women with LBP were significantly older (p< 0.001) and reported more sleep disturbances (p=0.026) than primiparous women with LBP. LBP prevented women performing their daily activities (n=41; 57.7%) and worsened with the advance of pregnancy (n=55; 77.5%), yet 93.0% (n=66) of these women received no treatment. CONCLUSION: LBP is a prevalent and important clinical condition affecting the daily life of many pregnant women. Nevertheless, few women seek any treatment and physiotherapy is rarely considered. Given the significant impact on quality of life, health professionals need to be proactive in asking women about LBP.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the self-reported prevalence and impact of low back pain (LBP) during pregnancy in primiparous and multiparous women, and their treatment-seeking rationales and experiences, including their use of physiotherapy. METHODS: A sample of 105 post-partum women was recruited. All participants answered a questionnaire; women who experienced LBP during pregnancy (n=71) continue in the study and later they were also interviewed. Content analysis, descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Reports of LBP were common (n=71; 67.6%) and slightly more frequent in primiparous (n=40; 56.3%) than multiparous (n=31; 43.7%) women. Multiparous women with LBP were significantly older (p< 0.001) and reported more sleep disturbances (p=0.026) than primiparous women with LBP. LBP prevented women performing their daily activities (n=41; 57.7%) and worsened with the advance of pregnancy (n=55; 77.5%), yet 93.0% (n=66) of these women received no treatment. CONCLUSION: LBP is a prevalent and important clinical condition affecting the daily life of many pregnant women. Nevertheless, few women seek any treatment and physiotherapy is rarely considered. Given the significant impact on quality of life, health professionals need to be proactive in asking women about LBP.
Entities:
Keywords:
Low back pain; multiparous; physiotherapy; pregnancy; primiparous
Authors: Carmen Hawker; Laura O'Connor; Poovendhree Reddy; Firoza Haffejee; Maureen N Sibiya; Dorinda Borg; Shanaz Ghuman; Thembilihle S P Ngxongo; Nalini Govender Journal: Health SA Date: 2021-07-30
Authors: Aleksandra Bryndal; Marian Majchrzycki; Agnieszka Grochulska; Sebastian Glowinski; Agnieszka Seremak-Mrozikiewicz Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2020-06-15