Literature DB >> 25271049

β-blockers and cardiovascular events in patients with and without myocardial infarction: post hoc analysis from the CHARISMA trial.

Sripal Bangalore1, Deepak L Bhatt2, Ph Gabriel Steg2, Michael A Weber2, William E Boden2, Christian W Hamm2, Gilles Montalescot2, Amy Hsu2, Keith A A Fox2, A Michael Lincoff2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of β-blockers in patients with and without myocardial infarction (MI) is controversial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This is post hoc analysis from the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial of 4772 patients with prior MI, 7804 patients with known atherothrombosis, and 2101 patients with risk factors alone but without heart failure. Primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal MI, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. The cohorts were divided into 2 groups based on baseline β-blocker use. In the propensity score-matched prior MI cohort, after 28 months of follow-up, β-blocker use was associated with a 31% lower risk of the primary outcome (70 [7.1%] versus 100 [10.2%]; hazards ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.94; P=0.021), driven by a lower risk of recurrent MI (33 [3.4%] versus 48 [4.9%]; hazards ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-1.00; P=0.049) with no difference in mortality (52 [5.3%] versus 66 [6.7%]; P=0.20). In the known atherothrombotic disease and the risk factors alone cohorts, β-blocker use was not associated with lower ischemic outcomes, whereas a trend toward a higher risk of stroke (3.5% versus 1.5%; hazards ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-4.92; P=0.079) was observed in the risk factors alone cohort. This higher stroke risk was significant in the regression model adjusted to the propensity score (hazards ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-5.44; P=0.006) and in the multivariable models.
CONCLUSIONS: β-blocker use in patients with prior MI but no heart failure was associated with a lower composite cardiovascular outcome driven by lower risk of recurrent MI with no difference in mortality. However, β-blocker use was not associated with lower cardiovascular events in those without MI, with a suggestion of inferior outcome with regard to stroke risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00050817.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; myocardial infarction; outcome measures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25271049     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  22 in total

Review 1.  Medical management of chronic stable angina.

Authors:  Yong Wee; Kylie Burns; Nicholas Bett
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-08-03

2.  Effectiveness of beta blockers in patients with and without a history of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sanjay Verma; Edward L Peterson; Bin Liu; Hani N Sabbah; L Keoki Williams; David E Lanfear
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease treated in different therapy units at department of cardiology: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cong Fu; Yuyu Yao; Xin Wang; Chaojun Yu; Genshan Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  β-Blockers and ivabradine differentially affect cardiopulmonary function and left ventricular filling index.

Authors:  Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat; Jörg Honold; Denise Lochmann; Sebastian Wolter; Christoph Liebetrau; Stephan Fichtlscherer; Helge Möllmann; Ioakim Spyridopoulos; Christian W Hamm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Beta-Blockers, Calcium Channel Blockers, and Mortality in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Jose B Cruz Rodriguez; Haider Alkhateeb
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Ivabradine in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Rationale for Use in Addition to and Beyond Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Cosmo Godino; Antonio Colombo; Alberto Margonato
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 7.  Drug Therapy for Stable Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Talla A Rousan; Sunil T Mathew; Udho Thadani
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Patrizia Natale; Suetonia C Palmer; Valeria M Saglimbene; Marinella Ruospo; Mona Razavian; Jonathan C Craig; Meg J Jardine; Angela C Webster; Giovanni Fm Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-28

9.  Comparative Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Black and White Patients Treated at US Veterans Affairs Hospitals.

Authors:  Taisei Kobayashi; Thomas J Glorioso; Ehrin J Armstrong; Thomas M Maddox; Mary E Plomondon; Gary K Grunwald; Steven M Bradley; Thomas T Tsai; Stephen W Waldo; Sunil V Rao; Subhash Banerjee; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Deepak L Bhatt; A Garvey Rene; Robert L Wilensky; Peter W Groeneveld; Jay Giri
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Does modern medicine increase life-expectancy: Quest for the Moon Rabbit?

Authors:  Sundeep Mishra
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.