PURPOSE: To evaluate reported ingested dose of paracetamol as a risk assessment tool in acute paracetamol overdose. METHODS: Data was retrospectively obtained from a clinical toxicology database linked to one Australian and two United Kingdom hospitals. Plasma paracetamol concentrations (PPCs) of adult patients presenting with acute single ingestion, non-staggered paracetamol deliberate self-poisoning between 2006 and 2012 were recorded and plotted on a treatment nomogram to determine accuracy of reported dose ingested as an indicator for antidotal treatment. PPC plotted on a treatment nomogram with a line intersecting a 4-h concentration of 100 mg/L [667 μmol/L] was considered an indication for antidotal treatment in the UK; the corresponding Australasian population utilised a line intersecting 150 mg/L [1000 μmol/L]. RESULTS: Of 1246 patients, 65.7 % were female and 88 % were from the UK. Fifty-two percent of patients reporting ingestion of ≥8 g paracetamol had a PPC above the 100 mg/L treatment line; PPV 52 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 49 %, 55 %], sensitivity 81 % [95 %CI 78 %, 85 %]. Forty-four of patients reporting percent ingestion of ≥10 g had a PPC above the 150 mg/L treatment line; PPV 44 % [95 % CI 41 %, 49 %], sensitivity 85 % [95 % CI 78 %, 89 %], 72 % of patients reporting ingestion of ≥16 g had a PPC above the 100 mg/L treatment line; PPV 72 % [95% CI 67 %, 77 %], sensitivity 50 % [95 % CI 45 %, 54 %]. Overall, there was moderate correlation (R = 0.58) between reported paracetamol dose ingested and extrapolated 4-h PPC. CONCLUSIONS: There is a positive correlation between reported ingested dose of paracetamol and subsequent chance of a PPC being above a defined treatment line; however, ingested dose of paracetamol alone is a poor risk assessment tool in accurately determining need for treatment with an antidote.
PURPOSE: To evaluate reported ingested dose of paracetamol as a risk assessment tool in acute paracetamoloverdose. METHODS: Data was retrospectively obtained from a clinical toxicology database linked to one Australian and two United Kingdom hospitals. Plasma paracetamol concentrations (PPCs) of adult patients presenting with acute single ingestion, non-staggered paracetamol deliberate self-poisoning between 2006 and 2012 were recorded and plotted on a treatment nomogram to determine accuracy of reported dose ingested as an indicator for antidotal treatment. PPC plotted on a treatment nomogram with a line intersecting a 4-h concentration of 100 mg/L [667 μmol/L] was considered an indication for antidotal treatment in the UK; the corresponding Australasian population utilised a line intersecting 150 mg/L [1000 μmol/L]. RESULTS: Of 1246 patients, 65.7 % were female and 88 % were from the UK. Fifty-two percent of patients reporting ingestion of ≥8 g paracetamol had a PPC above the 100 mg/L treatment line; PPV 52 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 49 %, 55 %], sensitivity 81 % [95 %CI 78 %, 85 %]. Forty-four of patients reporting percent ingestion of ≥10 g had a PPC above the 150 mg/L treatment line; PPV 44 % [95 % CI 41 %, 49 %], sensitivity 85 % [95 % CI 78 %, 89 %], 72 % of patients reporting ingestion of ≥16 g had a PPC above the 100 mg/L treatment line; PPV 72 % [95% CI 67 %, 77 %], sensitivity 50 % [95 % CI 45 %, 54 %]. Overall, there was moderate correlation (R = 0.58) between reported paracetamol dose ingested and extrapolated 4-h PPC. CONCLUSIONS: There is a positive correlation between reported ingested dose of paracetamol and subsequent chance of a PPC being above a defined treatment line; however, ingested dose of paracetamol alone is a poor risk assessment tool in accurately determining need for treatment with an antidote.
Authors: Alvin C Bronstein; Daniel A Spyker; Louis R Cantilena; Jody L Green; Barry H Rumack; Sandra L Giffin Journal: Clin Toxicol (Phila) Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.467
Authors: Anne M Larson; Julie Polson; Robert J Fontana; Timothy J Davern; Ezmina Lalani; Linda S Hynan; Joan S Reisch; Frank V Schiødt; George Ostapowicz; A Obaid Shakil; William M Lee Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: S M D K Ganga Senarathna; Shalini S Ranganathan; Nick Buckley; S S S B D Preethi Soysa; B M Rohini Fernandopulle Journal: Indian J Pharmacol Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.200