Literature DB >> 25270594

Single-stage cholecystectomy at the time of pancreatic necrosectomy is safe and prevents future biliary complications: a 20-year single institutional experience with 217 consecutive patients.

Zhi Ven Fong1, Miroslav Peev, Andrew L Warshaw, Keith D Lillemoe, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo, George C Velmahos, Peter J Fagenholz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend cholecystectomy (CCY) during the index admission for mild to moderate biliary pancreatitis as delayed CCY is associated with a substantial risk of recurrent biliary events. Delayed CCY is recommended in severe pancreatitis. The optimal timing of CCY in necrotizing pancreatitis, however, has not been well studied. We sought to determine the safety of single-stage CCY performed at the time of necrosectomy and its effectiveness in preventing subsequent biliary complications.
METHODS: We retrospectively queried our institutional database of patients who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis from 1992 to 2012.
RESULTS: We identified 217 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy during the study period. The most common etiologies of pancreatitis were biliary (41 %) and alcoholic (24%), with a median computed tomography (CT) severity index score of 6 ± 1.6 and a 63.6% incidence of infected necrosis. Ninety-eight patients had undergone CCY prior to necrosectomy. Seventy patients (59% of those with gallbladders in situ) underwent CCY at the time of pancreatic necrosectomy. CCY was not performed in the remaining 49 due to a clear non-biliary etiology (35%), technical difficulty (29%), intraoperative hemodynamic instability (18%), or surgeon preference (18%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality was no different between the CCY and no CCY groups, with no bile duct injury or bile leaks in patients undergoing CCY at the time of necrosectomy. Of the patients undergoing CCY, 43% of patients without cholelithiasis or biliary sludge on preoperative imaging had gallstones or sludge identified pathologically after single-stage CCY. Of those who did not receive a single-stage CCY, biliary complications developed in 17 (35%) of patients (21% cholecystitis, 14% recurrent gallstone pancreatitis) at a median time to incidence of 10 months. Seventeen (35%) patients eventually received a postnecrosectomy cholecystectomy, of which 75% required an open procedure.
CONCLUSION: Single-stage CCY at the time of pancreatic necrosectomy is safe in selected patients and should be performed if technically feasible to prevent future biliary complications and reduce the need for a subsequent separate, often open, CCY.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25270594     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2650-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  23 in total

1.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy permits interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  T Ryan Heider; Alphonso Brown; Ian S Grimm; Kevin E Behrns
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective study on the incidence of cholangitis and clinical predictors of retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  L Chang; S K Lo; B E Stabile; R J Lewis; C de Virgilio
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Minimal access retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy: improvement in morbidity and mortality with a less invasive approach.

Authors:  Michael G T Raraty; Christopher M Halloran; Susanna Dodd; Paula Ghaneh; Saxon Connor; Jonathan Evans; Robert Sutton; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.

Authors:  C A Steiner; E B Bass; M A Talamini; H A Pitt; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Dhiraj Yadav; Albert B Lowenfels
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study).

Authors:  H Seifert; M Biermer; W Schmitt; C Jürgensen; U Will; R Gerlach; C Kreitmair; A Meining; T Wehrmann; T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; D L Robinson; A J Megibow; J H Ranson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Débridement and closed packing for the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  C Fernández-del Castillo; D W Rattner; M A Makary; A Mostafavi; D McGrath; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; J H Ranson; D P Naidich; A J Megibow; R Caccavale; M M Cooper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: summary of a multidisciplinary consensus conference.

Authors:  Martin L Freeman; Jens Werner; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Todd H Baron; Marc G Besselink; John A Windsor; Karen D Horvath; Eric vanSonnenberg; Thomas L Bollen; Santhi Swaroop Vege
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.