Literature DB >> 25270560

Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.

Alicia Leiva1, Fabrice B R Parmentier2, Pilar Andrés1.   

Abstract

We report the results of oddball experiments in which an irrelevant stimulus (standard, deviant) was presented before a target stimulus and the modality of these stimuli was manipulated orthogonally (visual/auditory). Experiment 1 showed that auditory deviants yielded distraction irrespective of the target's modality while visual deviants did not impact on performance. When participants were forced to attend the distractors in order to detect a rare target ("target-distractor"), auditory deviants yielded distraction irrespective of the target's modality and visual deviants yielded a small distraction effect when targets were auditory (Experiments 2 & 3). Visual deviants only produced distraction for visual targets when deviant stimuli were not visually distinct from the other distractors (Experiment 4). Our results indicate that while auditory deviants yield distraction irrespective of the targets' modality, visual deviants only do so when attended and under selective conditions, at least when irrelevant and target stimuli are temporally and perceptually decoupled.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; auditory attention; selective attention; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25270560     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  6 in total

1.  Modulation of executive attention by threat stimulus in test-anxious students.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Renlai Zhou; Jilin Zou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-01

2.  Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Antonia P Pacheco-Unguetti; Sara Valero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Fabrice Br Parmentier; Bernhard Angele; Julie A Kirkby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  No sound is more distracting than the one you're trying not to hear: delayed costs of mental control of task-irrelevant neutral and emotional sounds.

Authors:  Örn Kolbeinsson; Erkin Asutay; Manja Enström; Jonas Sand; Hugo Hesser
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Distraction by violation of sensory predictions: Functional distinction between deviant sounds and unexpected silences.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Alicia Leiva; Pilar Andrés; Murray T Maybery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.