BACKGROUND: With the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma, nutritional access has become essential to counter deleterious effects of dysphagia. Current NCCN guidelines do not recommend PEG prior to esophagectomy in these patients, but there is little evidence for this recommendation. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes in patients who underwent esophagectomy with or without prior PEG placement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 96 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2005 and 2012 for esophageal carcinoma. Patients were divided into two groups; Group I (PEG +ve) and Group II (PEG -ve). Patient characteristics, operative variables, and post-operative complications were compared. χ (2) and Fisher's test were used for categorical, while t test was used for interval variables. RESULTS: Median age was 51(18-70) years. Lower thoracic tumors were more common in Group I (69 vs. 63 %) (P = 0.04) and more patients underwent minimally invasive surgery in this group (50 vs. 2.6 %) (P < 0.0001). Mean blood loss (326 vs. 465 ml) (P = 0.02) and ICU stay (1.6 vs. 4.3 days) (P = 0.01) were significantly lower in Group I. There was no 30-day mortality in Group I versus 10.5 % in Group II (P = 0.01). No significant difference in anastomotic leak and stricture rate was observed. Gastric conduit was used in all patients for reconstruction. One patient had malignancy in PEG site biopsy. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy before esophagectomy is safe and does not adversely impact post-operative outcomes.
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma, nutritional access has become essential to counter deleterious effects of dysphagia. Current NCCN guidelines do not recommend PEG prior to esophagectomy in these patients, but there is little evidence for this recommendation. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes in patients who underwent esophagectomy with or without prior PEG placement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 96 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2005 and 2012 for esophageal carcinoma. Patients were divided into two groups; Group I (PEG +ve) and Group II (PEG -ve). Patient characteristics, operative variables, and post-operative complications were compared. χ (2) and Fisher's test were used for categorical, while t test was used for interval variables. RESULTS: Median age was 51(18-70) years. Lower thoracic tumors were more common in Group I (69 vs. 63 %) (P = 0.04) and more patients underwent minimally invasive surgery in this group (50 vs. 2.6 %) (P < 0.0001). Mean blood loss (326 vs. 465 ml) (P = 0.02) and ICU stay (1.6 vs. 4.3 days) (P = 0.01) were significantly lower in Group I. There was no 30-day mortality in Group I versus 10.5 % in Group II (P = 0.01). No significant difference in anastomotic leak and stricture rate was observed. Gastric conduit was used in all patients for reconstruction. One patient had malignancy in PEG site biopsy. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy before esophagectomy is safe and does not adversely impact post-operative outcomes.
Authors: P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.113