Literature DB >> 25269724

[Adrenal tumors: principles of imaging and differential diagnostics].

C Degenhart1.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Adrenal masses are very common and are usually detected incidentally. Less frequently, imaging is performed for the localization of the underlying lesion in the case of endocrine disease. The differentiation between adenomas and non-adenomas is fundamental. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Adenomas show a low density on unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and a rapid washout of contrast agents. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) adenomas are characterized by a low signal in opposed phase imaging as compared to in phase imaging. PERFORMANCE: According to the literature a density of less than 10 HU in an adrenal mass has a specificity of 98% and a sensitivity of 71% for the presence of an adenoma and MRI is slightly more sensitive. Some adrenal lesions, e.g. cysts or myelolipomas can be diagnosed with high accuracy due to pathognomonic findings. ACHIEVEMENTS: In the majority of cases the synopsis of imaging along with clinical and laboratory findings is necessary for a reliable diagnosis. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: For the evaluation of an adrenal mass the CT examination should begin with an unenhanced scan, if necessary followed by a washout examination. In the case of MRI in phase and opposed phase imaging are essential components of the examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25269724     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-014-2690-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  43 in total

Review 1.  Adrenal imaging.

Authors:  Michael A Blake; Carmel G Cronin; Giles W Boland
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Adrenal masses: contemporary imaging characterization.

Authors:  Ashkan A Malayeri; Atif Zaheer; Elliot K Fishman; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  The American College of Radiology strategy for managing incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography.

Authors:  Lincoln L Berland
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas: assessment of washout at delayed contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  D H Szolar; F H Kammerhuber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The role of surgery in the treatment of clinically isolated adrenal metastasis.

Authors:  S H Kim; M F Brennan; P Russo; M E Burt; D G Coit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Adenoma characterization: adrenal protocol with dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Yi Kyung Kim; Byung Kwan Park; Chan Kyo Kim; Sung Yoon Park
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Lipid-poor adenomas on unenhanced CT: does histogram analysis increase sensitivity compared with a mean attenuation threshold?

Authors:  Lisa M Ho; Erik K Paulson; Matthew J Brady; Terence Z Wong; Sebastian T Schindera
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer that is similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink?

Authors:  T J Cawood; P J Hunt; D O'Shea; D Cole; S Soule
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.664

9.  Adrenal masses: CT characterization with histogram analysis method.

Authors:  Kyongtae T Bae; Pornpim Fuangtharnthip; Srinivasa R Prasad; Bonnie N Joe; Jay P Heiken
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Evaluation of patients with adrenal incidentalomas.

Authors:  Subramanian Kannan; Erick M Remer; Amir H Hamrahian
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.243

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Endocrine tumors: clinical overview].

Authors:  G Leidig-Bruckner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.