Literature DB >> 25268794

US definitions, current use, and FDA stance on use of platelet-rich plasma in sports medicine.

Knut Beitzel1, Donald Allen2, John Apostolakos2, Ryan P Russell2, Mary Beth McCarthy2, Gregory J Gallo2, Mark P Cote2, Augustus D Mazzocca2.   

Abstract

With increased utilization of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), it is important for clinicians to understand the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory role and stance on PRP. Blood products such as PRP fall under the prevue of FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). CBER is responsible for regulating human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products. The regulatory process for these products is described in the FDA's 21 CFR 1271 of the Code of Regulations. Under these regulations, certain products including blood products such as PRP are exempt and therefore do not follow the FDA's traditional regulatory pathway that includes animal studies and clinical trials. The 510(k) application is the pathway used to bring PRP preparation systems to the market. The 510(k) application allows devices that are "substantially equivalent" to a currently marketed device to come to the market. There are numerous PRP preparation systems on the market today with FDA clearance; however, nearly all of these systems have 510(k) clearance for producing platelet-rich preparations intended to be used to mix with bone graft materials to enhance bone graft handling properties in orthopedic practices. The use of PRP outside this setting, for example, an office injection, would be considered "off label." Clinicians are free to use a product off-label as long as certain responsibilities are met. Per CBER, when the intent is the practice of medicine, clinicians "have the responsibility to be well informed about the product, to base its use on firm scientific rationale and on sound medical evidence, and to maintain records of the product's use and effects." Finally, despite PRP being exempted, the language in 21 CFR 1271 has caused some recent concern over activated PRP; however to date, the FDA has not attempted to regulate activated PRP. Clinicians using activated PRP should be mindful of these concerns and continued to stay informed. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25268794     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  24 in total

Review 1.  The Economics and Regulation of PRP in the Evolving Field of Orthopedic Biologics.

Authors:  Ian A Jones; Ryan C Togashi; C Thomas Vangsness
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  How does surgery compare with advanced intra-articular therapies in knee osteoarthritis: current thoughts.

Authors:  Peter Wehling; Carsten Moser; William Maixner
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 3.  What is new in pain modification in osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Joel A Block; Anne-Marie Malfait
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Platelet-rich plasma for sports-related muscle, tendon and ligament injuries: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Mario Cruciani; Massimo Franchini; Carlo Mengoli; Giuseppe Marano; Ilaria Pati; Francesca Masiello; Samantha Profili; Eva Veropalumbo; Simonetta Pupella; Stefania Vaglio; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma for the management of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ron Gilat; Eric D Haunschild; Derrick M Knapik; Aghogho Evuarherhe; Kevin C Parvaresh; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The Cost Variability of Orthobiologics.

Authors:  Amit Mukesh Momaya; Andrew Sullivan McGee; Alexander R Dombrowsky; Alan Joshua Wild; Naqeeb M Faroqui; Raymond P Waldrop; Jun Kit He; Eugene W Brabston; Brent Andrew Ponce
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 7.  Intra-articular treatment options for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ian A Jones; Ryan Togashi; Melissa L Wilson; Nathanael Heckmann; C Thomas Vangsness
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  [Standardized management of platelet derivatives for tissue regeneration research and applications].

Authors:  Xingqin Xie; Yi Zhang; Xinxin Zhao; Tongxin Liu; Liping Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 9.  The Prognosis of Arthrofibroses: Prevalence, Clinical Shortcomings, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  William A Blessing; Amanda K Williamson; Jack R Kirsch; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 14.819

10.  The Quality of Online Resources Available to Patients Interested in Knee Biologic Therapies Is Poor.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Ryan C Rauck; Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Chukwuma Nwachukwu; William W Schairer; Riley J Williams; David W Altchek; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.