Jin-Bo Li1, Ling-Zhi Kong1, Li Fan1, Juan Fu2, Shu-Qin Chen3, Shu-Zhong Yao1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: chenshuqin1021@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal surgical management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 49 CSP patients who received transvaginal surgery in our hospital between December 2009 and April 2013. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A (30 patients) was defined as patients who had not received any treatment before transvaginal surgical management. Group B (19 patients) referred to patients who had received any previous treatment. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data of both groups were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Preoperative serum β-hCG level, preoperative hemoglobin level and average serum β-hCG resolution time of group A and group B were 53,458.50 (36,382.00-94,100.50) versus 9779.00 (932.50-29623.00)U/l, 123.87±10.95 versus 109.94±16.05 g/l and 3.55±1.81 versus 1.83±1.15 weeks (P<0.05). Vaginal bleeding and gestational age in group A were significantly lower than in group B, 2.5 (0.50-11.00) versus 15.00 (3.50-31.50) days and 52.50 (46.50-56.70) versus 60.00 (48.00-90.00) days, respectively (P<0.05). The operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenses and menstruation recovery time of group A and group B were 56.61±24.40 versus 67.56±43.52 min, 45.65±27.83 versus 76.67±50.87 ml, 5.10±2.89 versus 5.33±3.99 days, 9001.94±1848.37 versus 11,032.33±5534.14 RMB and 1.16±0.47 versus 1.26±0.63 month respectively, which were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative complication rate in group A was significantly lower than group B, 0 (0/30) versus 21.05% (4/19) (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate and total complication rate in group A and group B were 10.00% (3/30) versus 21.05% (4/19) and 10.00% (3/30) versus 31.58% (6/19) (P>0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal surgery is an effective and relatively safe treatment option for CSP patients.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal surgical management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 49 CSP patients who received transvaginal surgery in our hospital between December 2009 and April 2013. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A (30 patients) was defined as patients who had not received any treatment before transvaginal surgical management. Group B (19 patients) referred to patients who had received any previous treatment. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data of both groups were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Preoperative serum β-hCG level, preoperative hemoglobin level and average serum β-hCG resolution time of group A and group B were 53,458.50 (36,382.00-94,100.50) versus 9779.00 (932.50-29623.00)U/l, 123.87±10.95 versus 109.94±16.05 g/l and 3.55±1.81 versus 1.83±1.15 weeks (P<0.05). Vaginal bleeding and gestational age in group A were significantly lower than in group B, 2.5 (0.50-11.00) versus 15.00 (3.50-31.50) days and 52.50 (46.50-56.70) versus 60.00 (48.00-90.00) days, respectively (P<0.05). The operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenses and menstruation recovery time of group A and group B were 56.61±24.40 versus 67.56±43.52 min, 45.65±27.83 versus 76.67±50.87 ml, 5.10±2.89 versus 5.33±3.99 days, 9001.94±1848.37 versus 11,032.33±5534.14 RMB and 1.16±0.47 versus 1.26±0.63 month respectively, which were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative complication rate in group A was significantly lower than group B, 0 (0/30) versus 21.05% (4/19) (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate and total complication rate in group A and group B were 10.00% (3/30) versus 21.05% (4/19) and 10.00% (3/30) versus 31.58% (6/19) (P>0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal surgery is an effective and relatively safe treatment option for CSP patients.