Catalytic hydrogenation of dibenzyl 5-dipyrroketone-2,9-dicarboxylates followed by decarboxylative iodination affords a 2,9-diiododipyrroketone which gives a 2,5,9-trichlorodipyrromethene hydrochloride after nucleophilic addition/elimination, with adventitious chloride to replace the two iodide groups. Treatment with BF3·Et2O gives a 3,5,8-trichloro-BODIPY that readily undergoes regioselective Stille coupling at the 8-position, or homo/mixed couplings at the 3,8- or 3,5- and 8-positions. Stepwise and controlled replacement of the 3,5- and 8-chlorine atoms using Stille reagents results in formation of a completely unsymmetrical trisubstituted BODIPY. Several examples of unsymmetrical BODIPYs were synthesized and characterized using this methodology. Structure features of new BODIPYs are discussed within the context of 14 new X-ray structures, and photophysical parameters of all new BODIPY compounds are reported and discussed.
Catalytic hydrogenation of dibenzyl 5-dipyrroketone-2,9-dicarboxylates followed by decarboxylative iodination affords a 2,9-diiododipyrroketone which gives a 2,5,9-trichlorodipyrromethene hydrochloride after nucleophilic addition/elimination, with adventitious chloride to replace the two iodide groups. Treatment with BF3·Et2O gives a 3,5,8-trichloro-BODIPY that readily undergoes regioselective Stille coupling at the 8-position, or homo/mixed couplings at the 3,8- or 3,5- and 8-positions. Stepwise and controlled replacement of the 3,5- and 8-chlorine atoms using Stille reagents results in formation of a completely unsymmetrical trisubstituted BODIPY. Several examples of unsymmetrical BODIPYs were synthesized and characterized using this methodology. Structure features of new BODIPYs are discussed within the context of 14 new X-ray structures, and photophysical parameters of all new BODIPY compounds are reported and discussed.
4,4-Difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (known
as BODIPY) is a class of very versatile fluorophores that has been
widely recognized and exploited in the last several decades. These
dyes have found various applications as labeling agents, chemical
sensors, photosensitizers, and energy-related cassettes and in luminescent
devices.[1−4] BODIPY dyes have advantages compared with other fluorophores, including
large molar absorption coefficients and high fluorescence quantum
yields, redox active, relatively high thermal and photochemical stability,
and easy functionalization that enables the tuning of their properties,
such as absorption/emission wavelengths, charge-transfer, and amphiphilicity.[5−7] Due in part to their relatively low molecular weight, BODIPYs and
their conjugates usually show good permeability across the membranes
of living cells, making them suitable for biological and medical applications.[4−10]Various methods have been developed for the functionalization
of
BODIPYs to change their photophysical, hydrophobic, and charge-transfer
properties. These methods include, but are not limited to, electrophilic
and nucleophilic substitutions, palladium-catalyzed cross-couplings,
aromatic ring fusion, and Knoevenagel condensations.[5−7] Among these, aromatic ring fusion[7,11,12] and cross-coupling reactions[13−16] are particularly useful for inducing
bathochromic shifts of the BODIPY optical transitions via extension
of π-conjugation, while substitution reactions[17−21] are often used to modify the molecular amphiphilicity upon introduction
of heteroatom-based groups, and for bioconjugations. Halogenated BODIPYs
are particularly versatile substrates for functionalization purposes
via both cross-coupling and nucleophilic substitution reactions, and
all halogens (fluoride, chloride, bromide, and iodide) have been introduced
into the pyrrolic positions of BODIPY (or a dipyrromethane or pyrrole
precursor), mainly using electrophilic substitution.[5,6,22−26] In particular, functionalization of the BODIPY core
at the 3,5-positions significantly affects the spectroscopic and photophysical
properties, and this strategy has been exploited for the synthesis
of a variety of functionalized BODIPYs, from 3,5-dichloro- or 3,5-diiodo-BODIPY
precursors.[13,14,17−21] On the other hand, a very useful method for facile transformation
of dipyrroketones into 5-chlorodipyrromethene salts using phosgene
was developed by Fischer and Orth[27] and
has since been exploited by others[28,29] and ourselves.[30] The resulting 8-chloro-BODIPYs are reactive
toward palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions and to nucleophilic
aromatic substitutions using N-, O-, and S-based nucleophiles. Palladium-catalyzed
Suzuki, Stille, Sonogashira, and Heck cross-coupling reactions have
all been performed on 3,5-chloro-BODIPY, while Suzuki, Stille, and
Sonogashira reactions have been achieved at the 8-position. Among
these, the milder Stille reaction conditions, using Pd(PPh3)4 and a organotin reagent in toluene, in the absence
of a base, gave 8-aryl, -alkyl, and -ethynyl-BODIPYs in yields >93%,[30] making it a highly efficient methodology for
the functionalization of chloro-BODIPYs. Herein we report the synthesis
of a symmetrical 3,5,8-trichloro-BODIPY (5) and describe
both its global and regioselective functionalization using Stille
coupling reactions to afford both symmetric and unsymmetric BODIPY
dyes with extended π-conjugated systems. The spectroscopic properties
of the 19 new BODIPY derivatives synthesized and structurally characterized,
including 14 X-ray structures, are compared and discussed.
Results
and Discussion
Syntheses
3,5,8-Trichloro-BODIPY 5, bearing
two methyl propanoate groups that could subsequently be used for bioconjugation,
was prepared as shown in Scheme 1. Symmetrical
dipyrromethane 1 was obtained by treatment of benzyl
4-(2-methoxycarbonylethyl)-3,5-dimethylpyrrole-2-carboxylate on a
10–20 g scale with 1 equiv of bromine in diethyl ether, followed
by heating in methanol. It was then oxidized with Pb(OAc)4/PbO2 in acetic acid[31] to give
the corresponding dipyrrylketone 2 in 60% yield. Unlike
our previously reported tetra- and hexaalkyldipyrrylketones,[30] the electron-deficient dipyrrylketone 2 could not be converted into the corresponding 5-chlorodipyrromethene
hydrochloride by reaction with phosgene. Therefore, dipyrrylketone 2 was subjected instead to palladium-catalyzed debenzylation
in a hydrogen atmosphere, followed by decarboxylative iodination to
provide the 3,5-diiododipyrrylketone 3 in 69% overall
yield.[32] Upon treatment with excess phosgene,
the 3,5-diiododipyrrylketone 3 was converted into the
fully conjugated meso-chlorodipyrromethene hydrochloride 4 which was not isolated but immediately complexed with BF3·Et2O in situ under basic conditions, to afford
BODIPY 5 as the major product in 55% yield from 3. BODIPYs 6 and 7 were also isolated
as minor byproducts, obtained in 11% and 5% yields from 3, respectively, after chromatographic separation. The trans-halogenation
of 3,5-diiododipyrrylketone 3 to give 4 is
probably a result of nucleophilic addition/elimination by chloride
during the process, as nucleophilic substitutions at the 3,5- and
8-positions of the BODIPY have been shown to occur in the presence
of a variety of nucleophiles.[17,28,30] On the other hand, byproducts 6 and 7 likely
resulted from dehalogenation of the 3- and 3,5-positions, respectively,
under the reaction conditions. The structures of BODIPYs 5 and 7 were unequivocally identified by their X-ray
structures, shown in Figure 1.
Scheme 1
Synthesis
of Halogenated BODIPYs by Phosgenation of Dipyrroketone 2
X-ray structures
of BODIPYs 5 and 7,
with 50% ellipsoids.
Synthesis
of Halogenated BODIPYs by Phosgenation of Dipyrroketone 2
Reaction conditions: (i) Br2, Et2O; (ii) MeOH, Δ (70% yield, two steps);
(iii) Pb(OAc)4/PbO2, (60%); (iv) Pd/C, H2, THF, (92%); (v) I2, NaHCO3, MeOH/H2O, (75%); (vi) COCl2 (toluene soln); (vii) BF3·Et2O, DIEA, (5, 55%), (6, 11%), (7, 5%).X-ray structures
of BODIPYs 5 and 7,
with 50% ellipsoids.Both molecules have essentially C2 symmetry,
with 7 lying on a crystallographic 2-fold axis, and 5 having nearly the same conformation. The torsion angle about
the CH2–CH2 bonds of the methyl propanoate
substituents is −66.1° in 7, while in 5, the two torsion angles differ by 21.2°, but their
mean value, −66.2°, closely matches that in 7. The central C3N2B ring is slightly more twisted
in 5, with N atoms lying ±0.11 Å out of the
C3B plane, compared to ±0.05 Å in 7. The N2B and BF2 planes form a dihedral angle
of 89.2° in 5 and 89.9° in 7.Because, as mentioned above, the milder palladium-catalyzed Stille
cross-coupling reaction[33,34] gave the highest yields
of functionalized BODIPYs,[30] in this study
we investigated Stille couplings, using four different stannane reagents,
in increasing order of reactivity: tributylphenyltin, trimethyl[(tributylstannyl)ethynyl]silane,
tributyl(1-ethoxyvinyl)tin, and 2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene, to produce
8-mono-, 3,8-di-, and 3,5,8-trisubstituted BODIPYs, as shown in Schemes 2–5.
Scheme 2
Global Stille Coupling Reactions of 3,5,8-Trichloro-BODIPY 5 To Give BODIPYs 8–10
Scheme 5
Consecutive Stille Coupling Reactions
of BODIPY 5 To
Give Differentially Functionalized BODIPYs 20 and 21
Anticipating
regioselectivity in the reactions of the 3,5,8-trichloro-BODIPY 5, we first addressed the global Stille coupling to demonstrate
that functionalization at the 3,5,8-positions of BODIPY 5 can be performed in one step. A typical procedure involved refluxing
a toluene mixture of 3,5,8-trichloro-BODIPY 5 and excess
organotin reagent (4.5 equiv), in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4, for 5–24 h. The global Stille reactions proceeded
in moderate to good yields, producing the corresponding 3,5,8-trisubstituted
BODIPYs 8–10 in 42–83% yields
(Scheme 2). The least reactive tin reagent
used, the tributylphenyltin, required the longest time refluxing in
toluene for 24 h, and gave the lowest yield of product. Products 8–10 showed red-shifted absorptions compared
with the starting material 3,5,8-trichloro-BODIPY 5,
which absorbs at λmax 538 nm; BODIPY 10 showed the most red-shifted absorption (λmax 648
nm), followed by BODIPY 8 (λmax 594
nm) and 9 (λmax 546 nm) (see Table 1). This is a result of a nearly perpendicular orientation
of the phenyl groups on the trisubstituted BODIPYs 9,
particularly the 8-phenyl, which prevents orbital interactions, whereas
the linear trimethylsilylethynyl group lies in the plane of the BODIPY
core, efficiently extending its π-conjugation (see Figure 2). In addition, in the case of the electron-rich
thienyl group, the thiophene tends to decrease the HOMO–LUMO
gap, therefore increasing the absorbance wavelength relative to the
phenyl analogue (vide infra).[35] Figure 2 shows the X-ray structures of BODIPYs 8 and 10.
Table 1
Spectroscopic Properties of BODIPYs
in Dichloromethane Solution at Room Temperaturea
BODIPY
abs λmax (nm)
emission
λmax (nm)
Stokes shift
(cm–1)
Φf
ε
5
538
550
406
0.58
112200
6
534
549
512
0.45
60300
7
528
547
658
0.30
38000
8
594
649
1427
0.10
43700
9
546
576
954
0.43
29500
10
648
660
280
0.01
88000
11
548
559
359
0.24
77600
12
534
544
344
0.86
69200
13
584
597
372
0.03
67600
14
560
591
936
0.27
17800
15
609
616
186
0.22
89100
16
574
629
1524
0.45
38900
17
594
600
168
0.34
47900
18
636
702
1478
0.08
29500
19
601
634
866
0.05
38900
20
616
625
234
0.21
46800
21
645
679
776
0.05
29500
22
555
587
982
0.53
33300
23
559
597
1138
0.67
13000
Fluorescence quantum yields (Φf) were calculated
as follows: rhodamine 6G was used as the
standard for compounds 5–9 and for
compounds 11 and 12; rhodamine B was used
as the standard for compounds 13, 14, 16, 17, 22, and 23;
methylene blue was used as the standard for compounds 10, 15, 18–21.
Figure 2
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 8 and 10,
with 50% ellipsoids.
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 8 and 10,
with 50% ellipsoids.Unlike the structures of 5 and 7 (Figure 1), both 8 and 10 have
their propanoate substituents extended, with torsion angles about
their CH2–CH2 bonds 170.4° and 179.7°
for 8, 157.7° and 179.7° for 10. All three of the thiophenes in 8 exhibit disorder
by 2-fold rotation about the C–C bonds joining them to the
rest of the molecule, with only the major conformers shown in Figure 2. The central C3N2B ring in
both molecules has a slight boat distortion, with B and the C opposite
it lying, respectively, 0.18 and 0.04 Å on the same side of the
plane formed by the other four atoms for 8, 0.19 and
0.04 Å for 10. The N2B and BF2 planes form a dihedral angle of 89.8° in both 8 and 10. The 12-atom BODIPY core of 8 makes
a dihedral angle of 89.6° with the 8-thiophene plane and 68.1°
and 39.9° with the other two.Regioselective coupling reactions
were performed on the 3,5,8-trichloro-BODIPY 5 using
the same organotin reagents as described above for
the synthesis of 8–10, but in a 1:1
ratio to the BODIPY rather than in excess. We anticipated monosubstitution
at the most electrophilic 8-position of the BODIPY.[23] The coupling reaction with 2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene
in refluxing toluene for 5 h gave the monothienyl-BODIPY 11 as the sole product, in 72% yield (Scheme 3). Under similar conditions, BODIPY 13 was also obtained in a reasonable yield (65%) along with trace amount
of the corresponding 3,8-disubstituted product. Using the least reactive
tin reagent, BODIPY 12 was obtained in only 21% yield;
however, the yield of 12 was increased to 57% when 2
equiv (rather than 1) of organotin were used, and no disubstitution
product was detected. The 1,7-propanoate groups likely lead to an
increased dihedral angle between the BODIPY core and the phenyl group,
resulting in blue-shifted absorption and emission bands. The X-ray
structures of BODIPYS 11–13 are shown
in Figure 3.
Scheme 3
Regioselective Stille
Coupling Reactions of BODIPY 5 at the 8-Position To Give
BODIPYs 11–13
Figure 3
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 11–13, with 50% ellipsoids.
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 11–13, with 50% ellipsoids.Both 11 and 12 have two independent
molecules
in the crystal (only one shown in Figure 3),
and the thiophene in both molecules of 11 is disordered.
The propanoate substituents of all three molecules are extended, with
torsion angle magnitudes in the range 175.9–179.8° for 11, 170.0–176.6° for 12, and 178.5°
and 179.8° for 13. In the central C3N2B ring of all three molecules, only the B atom is distinctly
out of plane, by a mean distance of 0.10 Å for 11, 0.14 Å for 12, and 0.12 Å for 13. In all three molecules, the BN2 and BF2 planes
form dihedral angles of 89.7° to 89.8°. The 12-atom BODIPY
core of 11 forms dihedral angles of 89.3° and 90.0°
with the thiophene planes in the two independent molecules. The BODIPY
core of 12 forms dihedral angles with the phenyl rings
of 86.5° and 87.8° for the two independent molecules.For the three new 8-substituted BODIPYs 11–13, different functional groups were introduced at the 3,5-positions
by Stille coupling reactions using 2.4 equiv of selected organotin
reagents, as shown in Scheme 4. Specifically, the 8-thienyl-BODIPY 11 was functionalized
at the 3,5-positions with phenyl and trimethylsilylethynyl groups
to provide BODIPYs 14 and 15, the 8-phenyl-BODIPY 12 was functionalized with thienyl and trimethylsilylethynyl
groups to give BODIPYs 16 and 17, and BODIPY 13 was functionalized with phenyl and thienyl groups to produce
BODIPYs 18 and 19. These double Stille reactions
proceeded in good yields (51–78%), the highest obtained using
the most reactive 2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene reagent and the lowest
using the least nucleophilic tributylphenyltin. Five of these differentially
substituted BODIPY compounds (specifically 15–19) were also characterized by single crystal X-ray crystallography,
shown in Figure 4.
Scheme 4
Double Stille Coupling
Reactions of BODIPYs 11–13 To Give
Differentially Functionalized BODIPYs 14–19
Figure 4
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 15–19, with 50% ellipsoids.
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 15–19, with 50% ellipsoids.Of the thiophene-containing molecules, 15 has its
thiophene ordered, 18 has one ordered and the other disordered,
and 16 has both disordered. BODIPY 19 has
disorder both in the phenyl and COOMe conformations. Only the major
conformers are shown in Figure 4. All five
molecules have their methyl propanoate substituents extended, with
torsion angle magnitudes about the CH2–CH2 bonds in the range 168.9–179.3°. There is some variation
in the conformations of the central C3N2B rings.
BODIPY 16 has the B atom 0.19 Å out of the best
plane of the other five atoms, while in the two independent molecules
of 19, the deviations are 0.19 and 0.35 Å. BODIPYs 15 and 17 have the slight boat distortion, with
deviations 0.12 (for B) and 0.05 Å (for C) in 15, and 0.22 and 0.04 Å, respectively, for 17. The
central C3N2B ring of 18 differs
from the others, having a twist conformation with the B atom 0.07
Å and a N atom 0.13 Å on opposite sides of the plane of
the other four atoms. The BN2/BF2 dihedral angles
in 15, 16, 17, and 19 are all 89.6–90.0°, while that of 18 is
slightly smaller, 88.9°. In 15, the BODIPY core
forms a dihedral angle of 77.0° with the thiophene plane. In 16 and 17, respectively, the BODIPY core forms
a dihedral angle of 87.6° and 80.0° with the phenyl plane.
In 18, the BODIPY core forms dihedral angles of 58.1°
and 44.9° with the two thiophene planes. In 19,
the BODIPY core forms dihedral angles in the range 60.5–74.9°
(mean value 70.5°) with the phenyl planes in the two independent
molecules.The synthesis of asymmetric BODIPYs was also accomplished
using
first 2 equiv of organotin reagent, followed by a second organotin;
this strategy produces asymmetrical BODIPYs on account of the higher
reactivity at the 8-position and the molecular symmetry about the
3,5-positions. The reaction of BODIPY 5 with 2 equiv
of trimethyl[(tributylstannyl)ethynyl]silane produced the 3,8-disubstituted
BODIPY 20 as the major product in 53% yield, along with
a trace amount of the trisubstituted-BODIPY 10 (Scheme 5). BODIPY 20 was
then treated with 2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene to yield BODIPY 21 in 63% yield. The structure of BODIPYs 20 and 21 were confirmed by their X-ray crystallography, shown in
Figure 5.
Figure 5
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 20 and 21, with 50% ellipsoids.
X-ray structures of BODIPYs 20 and 21, with 50% ellipsoids.As with all previous structures, except for 5 and 7, the methyl propanoate substituents of 20 and 21 are extended, with torsion angle magnitudes
about the CH2–CH2 bonds in the range
175.0° to 179.0°.
The conformation of the central rings are fairly planar, similar to
those of 11–13, with the B atom 0.11
Å out of the C3N2 plane for 20 and 0.15 Å for 21. The BN2/BF2 dihedral angle is typical of these compounds, 89.6° for 20 and 89.5° for 21. In 21,
the BODIPY core forms a dihedral angle of 43.1° with the thiophene
plane.Attempts to introduce three different groups at the 3-, 5-, and 8-positions of the BODIPY core were also investigated
by
consecutive Stille reactions using different organotin reagents, to
produce a completely asymmetric BODIPY. The phenyl group was first
regioselectively introduced at the most reactive 8-position to give
the 8-phenyl BODIPY 12. Next, thiophene was introduced
at the 3-position of BODIPY 12 using 1 equiv of 2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene,
resulting in the isolation of asymmetric BODIPY 22 in
43% yield along with a trace amount of BODIPY 16 (Scheme 6). Finally, an ethoxyvinyl group was introduced
into the 5-position of BODIPY 22 by reaction with tributyl(1-ethoxyvinyl)tin
to provide the fully asymmetric BODIPY 23 in 51% yield.
Scheme 6
Stille Coupling Reactions of BODIPY 12 To Give 23 Featuring Three Different Groups on the 3,5,8-Positions
Spectroscopic Properties
The spectroscopic properties
of all BODIPYs synthesized, including UV/visible absorption and steady-state
fluorescence emission, were studied in dichloromethane solution, and
the results are summarized in Table 1. Furthermore,
as an example, Figure 6 shows the normalized
absorption and fluorescence spectra for BODIPYs 5, 9, 13, and 15 (others are presented
in Supporting Information). All BODIPYs
show typical absorption and emission spectra for this type of compound,
with strong absorption bands corresponding to the S0–S1 transition (log ε = 4.1–5.1), a shoulder at
shorter wavelength due to the 0–1 vibrational band of the same
transition, and Stokes-shifted emission bands. The Stokes shifts vary
considerably for this group of BODIPYs, from 186 to 1524 cm–1; BODIPYs 8, 16, and 18, bearing
3,5-thienyl groups, have the largest Stokes shifts (1427–1524
cm–1) followed by BODIPYs 21–23, bearing only one thienyl group at the 5-position. In agreement
with these values, Stokes shifts of ca. 1500 cm–1 have been reported for 3,5-thienyl-substituted BODIPYs, and larger
values were achieved upon boron substitution with alkynylaryl groups
via intramolecular energy transfer.[11,36] It has also
been shown that 8-thienyl-substituted BODIPYs normally show small
Stokes shifts (ca. 350 cm–1) typical of BODIPY derivatives,[2] and that 2,6-dithienyl-BODIPYs can show even
larger Stokes shifts, presumably due to increased geometry relaxation,
i.e., the geometry difference between the S0 and the S1 states, upon photoexcitation.[37,38]
Figure 6
Normalized UV/visible absorption (solid
line) and fluorescence
emission (dashed line) spectra of selected BODIPYs 5, 9, 13, and 15 (left to right) in
dichloromethane solution.
The
introduction of chlorines at the 3,5-positions slightly red-shifts
the absorption and emission bands and increases the molar extinction
coefficients and fluorescence quantum yields, as previously observed,
due to the decrease in nonradiative deactivation processes.[24,39,40] As expected, the global Stille
coupling on BODIPY 5 caused pronounced red-shifts in
the absorption and emission bands, particularly for the 3,5,8-trimethylsilylethynyl-BODIPY 10 which showed a 110 nm bathochromic shift compared with 5 due to larger electronic coupling with the BODIPY chromophore,
therefore extending the π-conjugation system and decreasing
the HOMO–LUMO gap.[41] On the other
hand, the aromatic substituents on 8 and 9, particularly the 8-aryl groups, orient themselves nearly perpendicular
to the BODIPY core to minimize steric interactions, inducing smaller
red-shifts. In addition, the electron-releasing effect of the thiophene
group tends to decrease the HOMO–LUMO gap,[35] inducing larger red-shifts compared with the phenyl-substituted
analogues (see below). Similarly, the 3,5,8-trisubstituted BODIPYs 14–19, 21, and 23 obtained by mixed Stille coupling reactions all show bathochromic
shifts (21–107 nm) compared with BODIPY 5; the
greatest red-shifts were observed for the trimethylsilylethynyl-containing
BODIPYs 15, 17–19, and 21, and the smallest for the phenyl-containing BODIPYs 14 and 16.Regioselective coupling at only
the 8-position caused a slight
blue-shift in the case of 8-phenyl-BODIPY 12, and a slight
red-shift in the case of 8-thienyl-BODIPY 11, as previously
observed,[30] indicating that the most pronounced
effect on the absorption and emission wavelengths of the BODIPYs arise
from 3,5-aryl (rather than 8-) substitution. The large dihedral angle
(ca. 87° from crystal structure) between the 8-phenyl group and
the BODIPY core in 12 as a result of 1,7-disubstitution
induces blue-shifted absorption and emission spectra. On the other
hand, an 8-trimethylsilylethynyl group, as found in BODIPY 10, effectively extends the π-conjugation, inducing a 46 nm bathochromic
shift. In agreement with these results, it has been previously observed
that an 8-(2-phenylethynyl) group induces ca. 40 nm red-shifts although
small Stokes shifts.[41,42] Although the 8-thienyl group
forms an even larger dihedral angle with the BODIPY core in 11 (ca. 89° from crystal structure), the electron-releasing
effect of the thienyl group decreases the HOMO–LUMO gap, therefore
increasing the absorbance and emission wavelengths relative to BODIPY 12.[35]The fluorescence quantum
yields determined in dichloromethane were
significantly higher for the phenyl-substituted BODIPYs compared with
the thienyl- and trimethylsilylethynyl-substituted BODIPY analogues.
For example, the 8-phenyl-BODIPY 12 showed the highest
quantum yield (Φf = 0.86) of all BODIPYs in this
series, whereas the 3,5,8-trimethylsilylethynyl-BODIPYs 10 showed the lowest (Φf = 0.01). These results are
in agreement with our previous studies[30,35] and reflect
the greater freedom of rotation of the smaller thienyl group in comparison
with phenyl, even in the presence of the 1,7-propanoate substituents,
increasing the amount of energy lost to nonradiative decay to the
ground state. The aryl-ring rotation has been demonstrated to be critical
in determining the excited-state dynamics of BODIPYs, and in particular
their fluorescence quantum yields.[43,44] On the other
hand, the trimethylsilylethynyl groups increase the nonradiative molecular
relaxation which decreases the fluorescence quantum yields. We have
previously shown that upon deprotection of the trimethylsilyl group,
the resulting 8-ethynyl-BODIPY shows increased fluorescence quantum
yield.[30]Normalized UV/visible absorption (solid
line) and fluorescence
emission (dashed line) spectra of selected BODIPYs 5, 9, 13, and 15 (left to right) in
dichloromethane solution.Fluorescence quantum yields (Φf) were calculated
as follows: rhodamine 6G was used as the
standard for compounds 5–9 and for
compounds 11 and 12; rhodamine B was used
as the standard for compounds 13, 14, 16, 17, 22, and 23;
methylene blue was used as the standard for compounds 10, 15, 18–21.
Conclusions
A
very useful method for transformation of dipyrroketones into
5-chlorodipyrromethene hydrochlorides by using phosgene is inhibited
by the presence of conjugated 2,9-ester substituents. However, catalytic
debenzylation followed by decarboxylative iodination affords a 2,9-diiodopyrroketone
which does undergo the phosgene reaction to provide 2,5,9-trichlordipyrromethene
hydrochlorides after nucleophilic addition/elimination with chloride
to replace the two iodo groups. Treatment of these 3,5,8-trichlorodipyrromethene
salts with BF3·Et2O gives a 3,5,8-trichloroBODIPY
that readily undergoes regioselective Stille coupling at the 8-position,
or a combination of differential 3,8-disubstitution or 3,5- and 8-trisubstitution.
X-ray structures of 14 new BODIPYs are reported and analyzed. Global
Stille coupling at the 3,5,8-positions of BODIPY 5 caused
up to 110 nm bathochromic shifts (in the case of the 3,5,8-trimethylsilylethynyl-BODIPY 10) in the absorption and emission bands of the BODIPYs. Regioselective
and consecutive Stille coupling reactions produced a variety of asymmetric
BODIPYs; the 3,5-aryl and 3(5)- and/or 8-ethynyl substitution induced
the largest bathochromic shifts whereas the presence of a 3(5)-thienyl
substituent caused the largest Stokes shifts (up to 1524 cm–1). The 8-phenyl-BODIPYs showed the highest fluorescence quantum yields
(Φf = 0.34–0.86), followed by the 8-thienyl-BODIPYs
(Φf = 0.10–0.27), whereas the 8-ethynyl-BODIPYs
showed the lowest quantum yields (Φf = 0.01–0.21).
Experimental Section
General
1H and 13C NMR spectra
were measured on a 400 MHz NMR spectrometer at room temperature. Chemical
shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to TMS. High-resolution
mass spectra were obtained using the ESI-TOF mode. UV–visible
absorption spectra and fluorescence emission spectra were recorded
on a commercial spectrophotometer (190–900 nm scan range).
The slit width was set at 3.0 nm. Relative fluorescence quantum yields
(Φf) were calculated as follows: rhodamine 6G was
used as the standard for compounds 5–9 and for compounds 11 and 12; rhodamine
B was used as the standard for compounds 13, 14, 16, 17, 22, and 23; methylene blue was used as the standard for compounds 10, 15, 18–21. All commercial
reagents were used without further purification. Water- and air-sensitive
reactions were performed under argon protection and in dry solvents.
Benzyl 4-(2-methoxycarbonylethyl)-3,5-dimethylpyrrole-2-carboxylate
(15.7 g, 0.05 mol) was dissolved in anhydrous diethyl ether (500 mL),
and bromine (2.56 mL, 0.05 mol) was added dropwise. The solution turned
brown during addition, and the mixture was further stirred at room
temperature overnight, whereupon a thick precipitate was apparent.
Then the diethyl ether was removed under vacuum to give a pink solid
that was dissolved in methanol (100 mL) and refluxed overnight. When
the solution was cooled to room temperature, a precipitate appeared,
which was filtered and washed with cold methanol to give a white solid
(10.70 g, 70%) of dipyrromethane 1. Mp 102–104
°C, (lit.[45] mp 102–103 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 9.00 (s, 2H), 7.38–7.31
(m, 10H), 5.25 (s, 4H), 3.97 (s, 2H), 3,56 (s, 6H), 2.75 (t, 4H),
2.51 (t, 4H), 2.28 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3): 173.9, 161.4, 136.5, 130.9, 128.5, 128.0, 127.9, 127.2,
120.2, 118.0, 65.5, 51.8, 34.5, 22.4, 19.2, 10.4; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd
for C35H39N2O8 [M + H]+ 615.6928, found 615.6908.
A solution of dipyrromethane 1 (2.0
g, 3.25 mmol) in acetic acid (80 mL) was treated with Pb(OAc)4 (3.12 g, 7.0 mmol) and stirred at room temperature for 4
d under argon. Then PbO2 (2.4 g, 9.3 mmol) was added, and
the solution was stirred for another 2 d. The solution was centrifuged,
and the supernatant was poured into ice–water. The precipitate
was collected and dissolved in diethyl ether before being washed with
water, 5% aqueous NaHCO3, and brine and then dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4. Then the solution was concentrated
to a minimum volume and crystallized in a refrigerator to give product
as a yellowish white solid (1.2 g, 60%), mp 170–171 °C
(lit.[46] mp 173–174 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δ 7.38–7.31
(m, 10H), 5.00 (s, 4H), 3,67 (s, 6H), 3.01 (broad, 4H), 2.71 (broad,
4H), 2.27 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3)
δ 176.7, 173.6, 161.7, 135.0, 132.2, 130.2, 128.7, 128.4, 127.7,
127.0, 121.7, 66.8, 51.6, 35.2, 20.3, 10.4; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd for
C35H36N2O9 [M + H]+: 629.2499, found 629.2497.
Dipyrroketone 2 (6.14 g, 0.01 mol)
was dissolved in 300 mL of THF, and then 5% Pd/C (350 mg) catalyst
was added. The suspension was stirred under a H2 atmosphere
overnight. After TLC showed that reaction was complete, it was stopped
and the reaction solution was passed through a Celite cake to remove
the catalyst. The sticky solid on the top of the Celite cake was redissolved
and neutralized in water with aqueous ammonia, and the solution was
passed through the Celite cake once again. The filtrate was acidified
with acetic acid which caused a precipitate to appear from the aqueous
solution. The solid was collected by filtration. The THF filtrate
was evaporated and combined with the solid to give a total of 4.0
g (92%) of the 1,9-dicarboxylic acid product. This dicarboxylic acid
was suspended in a solution of H2O (250 mL)/MeOH (100 mL),
and NaHCO3 (4.48 g, 51.2 mmol) was added to the solution,
which was sonicated to form a slurry and then a clear solution. Then
a solution of I2 (3.84 g, 14.72 mmol) in methanol (60 mL)
was added to the mixture dropwise at room temperature with vigorous
stirring, and some brown solid was formed during the addition. When
the addition of iodine was complete, the stirring was continued for
another 2 h and the precipitate was filtered and washed with water,
saturated aqueous NaHCO3, and water again, followed by
hexane to remove any excess I2, to yield a yellowish solid.
The product was left to air-dry or dissolved in CH2Cl2 and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 before
removal of the solvent to give diiodopyrroketone 3 (4.2
g, 75%), mp 162 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δ 9.47 (s, 2H), 3.65 (s, 6H), 2.70 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 2.61 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 2.04 (s,
6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3) δ 173.8,
173.5, 132.7, 128.5, 126.4, 51.8, 33.9, 20.9, 12.2; HRMS (ESI-TOF)
calcd for C19H23I2N2O5 [M + H]+: 612.9691, found: 612.9697.
BODIPYs 5–7
Diiodopyrroketone 3 (1.0 g, 1.63 mmol) was dissolved in CHCl3 (150
mL), and excess phosgene in toluene solution was added to the solution,
which turned deep red with time; the reaction was monitored by UV/vis
spectrophotometry, and the reaction was stopped when a sharp absorption
peak appeared at about 480 nm. Then N2 gas was passed through
the solution to purge it of excess phosgene into an aqueous NaHCO3 solution trap. Solvent was removed in vacuo to give a reddish
solid, which was dissolved in 150 mL of CHCl3, followed
by addition of DIEA (2 mL, 7.0 equiv). The solution was stirred for
30 min, BF3·OEt2 (2.1 mL, 10 equiv) was
added, and the solution turned bright red with a yellow fluorescence
under long wavelength UV light. The reaction was monitored by UV/vis
spectroscopy, which showed a sharp peak at 538 nm. The mixture was
stirred for 24 h before being washed with water, saturated aqueous
NaHCO3, and brine and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 to give a red solid. The product was purified
by silica gel column chromatography, eluting with ethyl acetate/hexane
(1:4) to give the product 5 (430 mg, 55%) as the major
fraction and 6 (88.5 mg, 11%) and 7 (40.2
mg, 5%) as minor products. BODIPY 5: mp 156–157
°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δ 3.72
(s, 6H), 3.20 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 2.57 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 2.05 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz;
CDCl3) δ 172.5, 144.0, 142.3, 134.9, 128.5, 127.3
52.0, 33.8, 22.8, 8.9; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd for C19H20 BCl3FN2O4 [M – F]+: 475.0566, found: 475.0562; UV/vis (CH2Cl2): λmax (ε) = 538 nm (112 200).
BODIPY 6: mp 116–118 °C; 1H NMR
(400 MHz; CDCl3) δ 7.57 (s, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.71
(s, 3H), 3.20 (m, 4H), 2.58 (m, 4H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 2.04 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3) δ 172.5, 172.5, 143.5,
142.6, 142.4, 136.8, 130.1, 129.1, 128.7, 127.3, 126.8, 52.0, 51.9,
33.9, 33.9, 22.8, 22.2, 9.9, 8.9; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd for C19H21BCl2FN2O4 [M –
F]+ 441.0955, found 441.0935, UV/vis (CH2Cl2): λmax (ε) = 534 nm (60 300).
BODIPY 7: mp 148–149 °C; 1H NMR
(400 MHz; CDCl3) δ 7.58 (s, 2H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.21
(t, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 2.59 (t, J =
8.1 Hz, 4H), 2.08 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3) δ 172.8, 143.1, 142.5, 138.7, 130.4, 128.8, 51.9, 34.0, 22.2,
9.8; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd for C19H22BClFN2O4 [M – F]+ 407.1345, found 407.1342.
UV/vis (CH2Cl2): λmax (ε)
= 528 nm (38 000).
General Procedure for Stille Coupling Reactions
Global
Coupling Reactions
BODIPY 5 (15
mg, 0.03 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (2.0 mg, 5%) were
added to a round-bottomed flask. The flask was flushed with argon,
and then anhydrous toluene (15 mL) was injected, followed by injection
of the organotin reagent (0.14 mmol, 4.5 equiv). The solution was
refluxed for 12 h until the starting material disappeared from TLC
and the UV/vis spectrum showed a sharp peak around 600 nm. Then the
toluene was removed, and the residue was taken up in CH2Cl2, washed with water and brine, and then dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude product was purified
by chromatography to give the fully (tri-) substituted products.
The selective
coupling reactions followed the procedure used for the global coupling
reactions. The only difference was that 1 equiv of organotin reagent
was used instead of excess organotin reagents.
BODIPY 11 (16.5 mg, 0.030 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (3.4 mg, 5%) were added to a round-bottomed flask and
flushed with
argon several times. Anhydrous toluene (10 mL) was added, followed
by injection of tributylphenyltin (28.0 μL, 3.0 equiv); the
solution was refluxed for 12 h until a sharp peak appeared in the
UV/vis spectrum at 562 nm in CH2Cl2. The reaction
was stopped, and the toluene was removed; the residue was taken up
in CH2Cl2, which was washed with water and brine
and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude
product was purified by silica gel column chromatography, eluting
with ethyl acetate/hexane (1:4) to give the product as a purple-red
solid. All the other Stille cross-coupling reactions followed this
procedure.
BODIPY 5 (15.0
mg, 0.03 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (3.4 mg, 5%) were
added to a round-bottomed flask. The flask was flushed with argon
and then anhydrous toluene (15 mL) was injected, followed by injection
of the organotin reagenttrimethyl[(tributylstannyl)ethynyl]silane
(22.3 μL, 0.06 mmol). The mixture was refluxed until the starting
material disappeared as observed by TLC and the UV/vis spectrum showed
a sharp peak around 615 nm. Then the toluene was removed and the residue
was taken up in CH2Cl2 and washed with water,
brine and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4.
The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography
to give the disubstituted product 20 (10.0 mg, 53%),
mp 122 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δ
3.68 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.25 (m, 4H), 2.56 (m, 4H), 2.07 (s, 3H),
2.02 (s, 3H), 0.30 (s, 9H), 0.27 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100
MHz; CDCl3) δ 172.8, 172.7, 144.0, 142.1, 140.5,
135.2, 133.3, 132.9, 126.6, 118.9, 114.4, 113.1, 98.7, 96.0, 51.8,
51.7, 34.2, 34.1, 21.7, 21.4, 9.5, 8.2, 0.3, 1.2; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd
for C29H39BClF2N2O4Si2 [M + H]+ 619.2198, found 619.2185.
UV/vis (CH2Cl2): λmax (ε)
= 616 nm (46,800).
BODIPY 21
BODIPY 20 (10 mg,
0.016 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (2.0 mg, 5%) were
added to a round-bottomed flask. The flask was flushed with argon,
and then anhydrous toluene (15 mL) was injected, followed by injection
of the organotin reagent2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene (8.0 μL,
1.5 equiv); the mixture was then refluxed for 5 h. The toluene was
removed, and the residue was taken up in CH2Cl2, washed with water and brine, and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by silica gel
column chromatography to give the fully substituted product 21 (6.8 mg, 63%), mp 151 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz;
CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J = 3.44 Hz, 1H),
7.58 (d, J = 4.92 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 4.24 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 3.37 (t, J = 7.88 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 7.36 Hz, 3H), 2.64
(t, J = 7.88 Hz, 3H), 2.57 (t, J = 7.36 Hz, 3H),
2.15 (s, 3H), 2.09 (s, 3H). 0.30 (s, 9H), 0.28 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3) δ 172.9, 151.9, 150.2, 142.5,
139.2, 133.6, 132.9, 132.6, 131.7, 129.7, 129.5, 127.5, 118.5, 113.6,
112.0, 99.3, 96.6, 51.7, 51.6, 34.4, 34.2, 21.6, 21.4, 10.9, 9.6.
1.0; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd for C33H42BF2N2O4SSi2 [M + H]+ 667.2465,
found 667.2478. UV/vis (CH2Cl2): λmax (ε) = 645 nm (29 500).
BODIPY 22
BODIPY 12 (21.6
mg, 0.042 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (5.3 mg, 5%) were
added to a round-bottomed flask. The flask was flushed with argon,
and then anhydrous toluene (15 mL) was injected, followed by injection
of the organotin reagent2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene (14.0 μL,
1.0 equiv); the mixture was then refluxed for 5 h. The toluene was
removed, and the residue was taken up in CH2Cl2, washed with water and brine, and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by silica gel
column chromatography hexane/ethyl acetate (4:1) to give product 22 (10.5 mg, 43%), mp 164 °C. 1H NMR (400
MHz; CDCl3) δ 7.58–7.18 (m, 8H), 3.58 (s,
6H), 2.11–1.91 (m, 14H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3) δ 172.2, 172.1, 150.4, 143.2, 143.1, 142.2, 141.1,
133.9, 132.0, 131.6, 130.4, 130.1, 129.7, 129.0, 129.0, 128.9, 128.2,
127.4, 126.1, 51.6, 34.4, 26.9, 21.9, 10.5, 7.5; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd
for C29H28BClF2N2NaO4S [M + Na]+ 607.1417, found 607.1391. UV/vis (CH2Cl2): λmax (ε) = 555 nm
(33 300).
BODIPY 23
BODIPY 22 (9.4
mg, 0.016 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (2.1 mg, 5%) were
added to a round-bottomed flask. The flask was flushed with argon,
and then anhydrous toluene (15 mL) was injected, followed by injection
of the organotin reagenttributyl(1-ethoxyvinyl) (11.0 μL, 1.5
equiv); the mixture was refluxed for 5 h. The toluene was removed,
and the residue was taken up in CH2Cl2, washed
with water and brine, and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by silica gel column
chromatography hexane/ethyl acetate (4:1) to give the fully substituted
BODIPY 23 (5.6 mg, 51%), mp, >260 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δ 7.59–7.15 (m, 8H),
4.62 (s, 2H), 3.90 (q, J = 7.1, 2H), 3.57 (s, 6H),
2.11–1.91(m, 14H), 1.35(t, J = 7.1, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3) δ 172.4, 172.3, 152.3,
151.5, 142.6, 142.30 142.0, 141.9, 135.4, 134.4, 133.4, 131.5, 129.5,
129.3, 129.3, 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.4, 128.2, 127.2,91.1, 63.7,
53.4, 51.5, 34.5, 21.4, 21.1, 14.3, 10.5, 9.3; HRMS (ESI-TOF) calcd
for C33H36BF2N2O5S [M + H]+ 621.2406, found 621.2406. UV/vis (CH2Cl2): λmax (ε) = 559 nm (13 000).
Authors: Siang Hui Lim; Cliferson Thivierge; Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Junyan Han; Hubert van den Bergh; Georges Wagnières; Kevin Burgess; Hong Boon Lee Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Sunting Xuan; Ning Zhao; Xiangyi Ke; Zehua Zhou; Frank R Fronczek; Karl M Kadish; Kevin M Smith; M Graça H Vicente Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Ning Zhao; Tyrslai M Williams; Zehua Zhou; Frank R Fronczek; Martha Sibrian-Vazquez; Seetharama D Jois; M Graça H Vicente Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Andrea Savoldelli; Qianli Meng; Roberto Paolesse; Frank R Fronczek; Kevin M Smith; M Graça H Vicente Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Ning Zhao; Sunting Xuan; Brandon Byrd; Frank R Fronczek; Kevin M Smith; M Graça H Vicente Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.876