Literature DB >> 25268411

[Workplace Health Promotion in Germany: Prevalence and Utilisation. Analyses on Labour Force Surveys of the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in 2006 and 2012].

D Beck1, U Lenhardt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: This article describes representative data on the availability of and individual participation in workplace health promotion (WHP) in Germany. These data are based on responses of 17 870 employees which were collected within the Labour Force Survey 2011/12 of the Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training and the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. By comparison with data from the previous wave of the survey carried out in 2005/06 (N=17 803), medium-term trends in WHP are identified.
RESULTS: In 2012, 44% of the employees reported WHP activities in their companies, as against 38% in 2006. Increasing WHP prevalences were observed in all company sizes and economic sectors. In both surveys, employees in small companies reported significantly less WHP than those in large companies. Of all economic sectors, industrial manufacturing still showed the largest diffusion of WHP, even though the gap to other sectors has narrowed since 2006. The proportion of respondents who individually participated in WHP (if available) has slightly declined. The most striking difference in participation rates - which has even increased over time - is between small and large companies.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a moderately increased prevalence of WHP in Germany. At the same time, data still suggest a considerable need for WHP-related advice and support, particularly in small companies. On the basis of the analysed data, however, no statements can be made about qualitative characteristics of WHP activities in Germany. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25268411     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  9 in total

1.  [Workplace health promotion among elderly employees in Germany. Results in the IAB establishment panel 2011].

Authors:  Alfons Hollederer
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Prevalence and development of workplace health promotion in Germany: results of the IAB Establishment Panel 2012.

Authors:  Alfons Hollederer; Frank Wießner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Rural-urban differences in workplace health promotion among employees of small and medium-sized enterprises in Germany.

Authors:  Lara Lindert; Lukas Kühn; Kyung-Eun Choi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.908

4.  Patterns and predictors of workplace health promotion: cross-sectional findings from a company survey in Germany.

Authors:  David Beck; Uwe Lenhardt; Britta Schmitt; Sabine Sommer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Caring for Workers' Health: Do German Employers Follow a Comprehensive Approach Similar to the Total Worker Health Concept? Results of a Survey in an Economically Powerful Region in Germany.

Authors:  Aileen Hoge; Anna T Ehmann; Monika A Rieger; Achim Siegel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Do working characteristics influence the participation at health measures? Findings from a trial phase of workplace health promotion.

Authors:  Annika Reinhardt; Johanna Adams; Klaus Schöne; Dirk-Matthias Rose; Stefan Sammito
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  Factors in the Use of Workplace Health Promotion on Back Health. Results of the Survey "German Health Update".

Authors:  Sophie Hermann; Anne Starker; Raimund Geene; Susanne Jordan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-12

8.  Work-related psychosocial demands related to work organization in small sized companies (SMEs) providing health-oriented services in Germany - a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Anke Wagner; Elena Tsarouha; Eylem Ög; Christine Preiser; Monika A Rieger; Esther Rind
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Impact Model-Based Physical-Activity Promotion at the Workplace: Study Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study in Germany (KomRueBer Study).

Authors:  Andrea Schaller; Carina Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.