Literature DB >> 2526821

Comparison of the agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of teicoplanin MICs.

M T Kenny1, J K Dulworth, M A Brackman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for the measurement of teicoplanin MICs. The three standardized tests gave equivalent (within a twofold dilution) results with 98.8 to 99.0% of the 508 gram-positive clinical isolates tested, indicating that either method may be used for teicoplanin MIC determination.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2526821      PMCID： PMC267573          DOI： 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1409-1410.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile strains to new antibiotics: quinolones, efrotomycin, teicoplanin and imipenem.

Authors:  S W Newsom; J Matthews; A M Rampling
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  In-vitro activity of teicoplanin alone and in combination with rifampicin, gentamicin or tobramycin against coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  C Watanakunakorn
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Activity of nine antimicrobial agents against Corynebacterium group D2 strains isolated from clinical specimens and skin.

Authors:  R Fernández-Roblas; S Prieto; M Santamaría; C Ponte; F Soriano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  L Verbist; B Tjandramaga; B Hendrickx; A Van Hecken; P Van Melle; R Verbesselt; J Verhaegen; P J De Schepper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vitro activity of teichomycin compared with those of other antibiotics.

Authors:  H C Neu; P Labthavikul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative in vitro activities of teichomycin and other antibiotics against JK diphtheroids.

Authors:  L Jadeja; V Fainstein; B LeBlanc; G P Bodey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Quality control limits for teicoplanin susceptibility tests and confirmation of disk diffusion interpretive criteria.

Authors:  A L Barry; R N Jones; T L Gavan; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.948
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Antibacterial action of polyphosphate on Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Authors:  Ji-Hoi Moon; Jae-Hong Park; Jin-Yong Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance.

Authors:  N Woodford; A P Johnson; D Morrison; D C Speller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  In Vitro Effects of Polyphosphate against Prevotella intermedia in Planktonic Phase and Biofilm.

Authors:  Eun-Young Jang; Minjung Kim; Mi Hee Noh; Ji-Hoi Moon; Jin-Yong Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.